34 Years After Stephen Cysewski’s Infamous Tacoma Walking Tour: Is Tacoma Finally Ready to Repair Itself?

There have been countless numbers of incredible historical photos taken of Tacoma.  However, perhaps no set better captures downtown Tacoma in a moment of time as well as Stephen Cysewski’s 1979 walking tour does during Tacoma’s arguably lowest point in it’s history.  In this year, Tacoma faced an incredible sense of despair and downtown Tacoma was nearly wholesale abandoned.

tacoma005

tacoma130

tacoma136

tacoma143

It has been written that “[d]uring this period: “Downtown Tacoma experienced a long decline through the mid-20th century. Harold Moss, later the city’s mayor, characterized late 1970s Tacoma as looking “bombed out” like “downtown Beirut” (a reference to the Lebanese Civil War that occurred at that time.) “Streets were abandoned, storefronts were abandoned… City Hall was the headstone and Union Station the footstone” on the grave of downtown.”*

 

tacoma142

Fast forward to 2013.  

Much has been improved in Tacoma since 1979, yet some of the same challenges remain including the basic look of the city, namely the streets. 

These pictures from the Stadium District a week ago in October 2013:

 

2013-10-27_17.04.29

2013-10-27_17.03.53

10-25-13_A2_PHP_East_T_St_and_East_Columbia_AVE_500_500_80_s_c1

 

Last photo courtesy of the Tacoma Weekly’s Pothole Pig.

For Tacomans who have lived in the city more than 10 years, we face a big psychological challenge: we become acclimated to the blight in the city including the poor condition of the streets.  After awhile, the condition becomes normal for us as we look upon and attempt to swerve around a maze of potholes.  We vainly urge visitors to Tacoma, our friends and family, to look past the atrocious condition of the city and try to convince them how great the City of Destiny is: “No really its a great city!” we plead.

Proposition 1 would make a meaningful next step in doing our part to repair and rehabilitate the city as earlier generations of Tacomans have. It would permanently fix 3600 potholes every year and repave 510 neighborhood blocks over 5 years. It’s cost would be spread to large corporations like Walmart and many other large entities who often pay very little tax.

However, in the end, this measure is more about us as citizens of Tacoma than the measure itself and where we are as city in 2013.

Are we Tacomans ready to take the next step in the reconstruction of the City and repair itself via Proposition 1 or we still stuck in the inherited mindset of it’s 1979 era blightful near abandoned past?

.

1379591_10201344658752921_530708534_n

___________________

*Erik Hanberg, An Exercise in Hope, Faith, Vision, and Guts, Weekly Volcano (Tacoma), December 24, 2008.

 

Justin Camarata Joins Tacoma Sun as a Political Analyst for 2013 Elections

pic1.
.
.
Compared to Seattle’s contentious local elections, the primary election for City of Tacoma voters is a sleeper.  The only race on my ballot was for the Port Commissioner. Yet, there will be come some excitement in November as two Tacoma City Council races are in play as well as a Tacoma School Board race:
.
1) Olgy Diaz is challenging councilmember Joe Lonergan for the seat on District #5.
.
2) Patricia Lacy-Davis is challenging councilmember Robert Thoms for District #2.

.
Thankfully, Tacoma resident Justin Camarata has agreed to help out in the effort for the Tacoma Sun and sift through all of the press releases and media images and get to the heart of the issues.
.
Here is his bio:
.
“Justin Camarata is a University of Washington graduate in Political Science and a North End resident. He works in account management and marketing for Seattle-area internet companies and, when his two small boys allow, volunteers for Tacoma commissions and causes including the Ethics Board, the North End Neighborhood Council, and various political campaigns. He is particularly interested in exploring the intersection of new urbanism, local government, and technology. (He’s still trying to dream up the next great urban mobile app.) Books that have influenced Justin’s thinking on cities and urban issues include Jane Jacobs’ ‘The Death and Life of Great American Cities,’ Donald Shoup’s ‘The High Cost of Free Parking,’ and P.D. Smith’s ‘City: A Guidebook for the Urban Age.'”
.
You can find Justin  and connect with him on his on Facebook, LinkedIn profile, Google+,.
.
Justin is a veracious student, reader and everything Tacoma.   Exit 133 defunct condo map?  He had watched it rise and fall.  Tacoma’s Chinese tunnels? He has walked them.  Former Mayor Bill Baarma’s 456 page 1973 Doctoral Thesis on the City Manager system? Memorized.
.
I look forward to Camarata’s future posts on this year’s election for the betterment of the City of Destiny and to advise the rest of us on all things Tacoma.
.
-Erik Bjornson

.

308002_736045392400_273246751_n

Tacoma City Council Candidate David Boe Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:

Below are the questions and responses sent to David Boe, candidate for Tacoma City Council District #7. This at-large district is current represented by councilmember Boe who is running to be “retained” in the district.
.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the best method to restore the Winthrop Hotel, removing harmful Parking Requirements in downtown Tacoma, rebuilding Tacoma Streetcars, and addressing the Felon Dumping Ground Issue.

.

Tacoma Sun Candidate Questionnaire
Candidate:  David Boe
Position:  Tacoma City Council – At-Large No. 7
.

Q I: What education and experience do you have to qualify you to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective councilmember?
.

Answer:  I guess the short answer is that since I was appointed to the Tacoma City Council in January 2010, the current City Council believes that I have the education and experience qualifications for this position.  Having been a member of the Tacoma Planning Commission the previous 5-years to the appointment (the last three-years as Vice-Chair), they recognized their need to have a member with expertise on land use issues.   I also bring my experience from serving on the Tacoma Arts Commission where I was appointed to be a member of the 1992 Cultural Plan Steering Committee.  A unique qualification that I have for this city-wide position is that my wife and I have lived in both the South End and North End of Tacoma – and as an architect I have worked on projects across every district in the city (so Boe Knows Tacoma).
.
My formal education started with completing an Associate of Arts Degree (Liberal Arts) at Normandale Community College, followed by a Bachelor of Arts in Architecture at Iowa State (Go Cyclones), and the equivalent of a Master of Architecture at the Architectural Association School of Architecture in London.  During my five years in London, I spent two-years as the Project Coordinator for the Canary Wharf Light-Railway Station .  Since 1996 I have had my own architectural practice in Downtown Tacoma – and I think the perspective of being a successful small-business owner is an important voice in the make-up of the City Council.
.
As for books that are appropriate to my brief tenure on the City Council, I think Cervantes’ ‘Don Quixote,’ Calvino’s ‘Invisible Cities, and ‘Surely You Must be Joking Mr. Feynman.
.
What many folks may not comprehend about a City Manager-led form of government is that individual council members must be able to work well with their peers on the dais – as it takes at least 5 votes to get anything accomplished.  Trained as an architect, I am ingrained with a collaborative spirit and working with my fellow council members has been the most gratifying aspect of this challenging, but rewarding, service to the citizens of Tacoma.  Having been married to the same woman for the past 29 years, I do understand the value of a good compromise on occasion.
.
Q II: Growth management
.
Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5,000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000.  If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
.
Answer:  Density, Density and more Density (thus the moniker ‘Density Dave’).  I was on the Planning Commission when the City Council passed the Mixed-use Center Zoning Ordinance in 2009 – but in my opinion these regulations did not go far enough to provide incentive for development – and cracking this issue open is one of the main reasons I have decided to run for a full term (that and an awareness that very few members of the past City Council(s) have had a deep understanding of urban design).  The first issue I brought to the table once on council, and with luck will be passed this year, is to go to a market base parking requirement for new construction in our urban centers and commercial zones.  Many of our zoning regulations are out-of-date and provide more barriers than incentives for new development.  I contend that the 6th Avenue Business District continues to flourish due to existing buildings being allowed to be renovated and/or converted without requiring city mandated additional off-street parking lots.
.
Another issue is Land Banking (of which the City of Tacoma is just a guilty as the private market).  We need to get development on these ‘vacant’ parcels in order to positively change the market for new development.  Right now you cannot actually lease new construction for what it costs to construct the project.  Think about it.  The cost of a new building is pretty much the same whether you build it in Tacoma or in Kirkland (not including the land that is) – but in Kirkland you can get mid-$20s to $30 per square foot whereas the market in Tacoma is closer to $12-15 per square foot.
.
So most of the development that happens in Tacoma is by individuals or companies that want to develop here (thinking with their heart more than their head in many cases) or they require significant government assistance (City, State or Federal) to make their projects pencil (e.g. UWT, museums et al, Elks).  There is no silver bullet to solve this ongoing conundrum, but we need as many development tools in the toolbox as possible AND look at every policy decision to see how it creates additional residential density in our urban centers.  For example, the route of the streetcar expansion, for me, should be the one that maximizes transit oriented development opportunities.

.
Oh, and we should not be building anymore surface parking lots in our urban centers – another change that needs to be incorporated into the zoning code (i.e. new stand alone surface parking lots should not be allowed or permitted as a primary use in our urban centers).
.
Q III: Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
.
Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It? http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf.
Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County?
.
Answer:  I had not read the Tacoma City Club Report until you referenced it here in this question, although I was a new member on the City of Tacoma Planning Commission in 2005 when the Special Needs Housing Moratorium was enacted due to the concerns about an overly high concentration of release facilities in the Hilltop.  In my opinion this report accurately portrays the situation.  Like other job growth policies that have been introduced into Tacoma over the years, it was sold as an ‘economic generator’ without looking at the possible unintended consequences of such a success (e.g. Immigration Detention Center in the Port of Tacoma).  So local leaders courted the Department of Corrections in the past, agencies and organizations were successfully set-up to meet the need, and very low cost of housing makes it economically more viable than other urban centers in the state (see Item No. 2 above).  I pledge to continue working at the local and state level for Tacoma and Pierce County to reduce the total number of work release offenders to our ‘fair share’ distribution with the rest of the state.
.
Q IV: Restoration of Winthrop Hotel
.
Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support, if any, to restore the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel? What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?
.
Answer:  I think the best way forward is to consider putting together a multi-faceted group of developers with a wide array of funding sources – and look at dividing the building interior into a number of distinct zones.  For instance, storefront retail could be managed by a commercial retail developer, the Crystal Ballroom possibly managed by the Broadway Center (which would give it another unique venue for performances), the lower floors of the tower for student housing related to UWT, and the top floors of the tower managed by an experienced hotelier.
.
All of this will require close coordination with an entity like the Tacoma Housing Authority to work through the HUD voucher program that the current residents are using for their accommodation – and possibly look to additional housing being added, or converted, in the area to meet the existing population need.  I also think we need to look at incorporating a Historic Tacoma Public Development Authority in order to address the cause of historic buildings that are facing critical challenges like the Winthrop (e.g. Old City Hall and the now lost Luzon Building).

.
Q V: Rebuilding Tacoma
.
Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer:  I voted a loud ‘NO’ on Sauro.  But as noted earlier, it takes 5, not three, to win the day.  In addition to what I presented in response to Question 2, we need to look at multiple development incentive options given the size of the task – and one of these is really about educating our County, State and Federal partners about the reality of funding huge road projects that in reality just make it cheaper to build sprawl out in the rural areas.  Yes we have GMA, but if we are investing billions in new roads to make it cheaper to build in Graham, why would someone invest in Tacoma?  We really need to shift the paradigm.
.
I don’t want to get all James Howard Kunstler on you, but until we hit $8 a gallon, we’ll need to look at every opportunity to provide incentives for development in our urban centers.  Providing transit options will be a huge selling point in my opinion.  Tacoma is blessed with a wide variety of neighborhoods and growing Business Districts that are literally 10 minute by car, 20 minute by bicycle from Downtown.  McKinley Hill/East Side, South Tacoma, Central Tacoma, Hilltop, Stadium, 6th Avenue, and North End – many with amazing affordable historic housing stock.  This is a huge asset when planning for a connected city with transit, bicycle avenues, and good roads, curbs, gutters and sidewalks.  The Broadway LID has been a great boost to development and I will work to get similar projects to grow out from the neighborhood mixed-use centers to connect the entire City.  I am very proud to have worked on the Mobility Master Plan and making quality streets for pedestrians, bicycles, and transit is far, far overdue for Tacoma.
.
Q VI: Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown
.
Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing the cost of housing, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer:  I guess I should have read all of the questions before writing my earlier comments.  So do I support removing the off-street parking in requirement in Downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s Mixed-use Centers?  That is an absolute YES!  And with support from constituents this coming year, we can take another step to update the City of Tacoma Zoning Ordinance that still has regulations mired in 1980’s thinking.
.

Q VII: Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars
.
Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?
.
Answer:  Yes.  As noted previously, for me the routes need to reference the historic streetcar routes – as anyone who bicycles in Tacoma can tell you, you need to always think like a streetcar when planning your route to minimize the uphill climbs.  But we also need to make sure that the route makes damn good urban design sense AND maximizes neighborhood property for transit-oriented development potential AND we need to get real about ridership.
.
I personally think the route selected for the initial LINK was an urban design disaster once it leaves Pacific Avenue (and for those of you that like to pick on Tollefson Plaza – it’s the train that creates the majority of the problem – it doesn’t stop, it dissects the space so that is has no ability to have the much needed active frame to an open public space) – and thus it is going to take creative and critical thinking to vision routes that are appropriate for Tacoma now and the future (the current route up Commerce was based on politics and not good urban design).
.
You want to make Downtown and our Mixed-use Centers attractive for development?  Well then we better figure out how we can have a quality of life without relying on the single-occupancy vehicle.  And we are also going to have to get creative about financing and operations given the recent Pierce Transit funding situation.  I am not saying it is as easy as running the Streetcar to the Mall and/or to the Casino – but it might include long-range planning of a route to the Mall and/or to the Casino.

.
Q VIII: Pollution Issues in Tacoma
.
Question: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?
.
Answer:  The South Tacoma Air Quality Non-Attainment is a significant environmental health issue that is going to require close collaboration between all of the Federal, State, County and City partners to create an equitable solution (and it is an issue that in many ways is fueled by the need for a population to have inexpensive ways to heat their homes).  There is no easy way to address this issue – but I believe that my creative and collaborative skills can be an asset in developing a successful resolution.  It also is going to take some hard looks at how we think about wood fireplaces and wood stoves.
.
While Air Quality is huge –we also need to look at storm water capacities and sanitary infiltration.  I will continue to work with my council colleagues to foster and coordinate regulations that hit many of the environmental concerns on multiple levels.  For instance, the Urban Forestry project can help to increase the natural storm water capacity provided by an increase tree canopy (and reduce heat gain from the built environment) while infrastructure projects incorporate Complete Streets and Low-Impact Development Standards to address storm water issues at their source.  Tacoma has made great strides in addressing many of the industrial polluters – and in many ways we do not celebrate the advancement that we have made – but we still need to be vigilant especially regarding protecting ground water quality.
.
Q IX: Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson
.
Question: A few years ago, City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached.  What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?
.
Answer:  We need to build on the great work already completed by the Community Policing Programs through the Police Sub-stations, great community programs like Safe Streets, and creating incentives/market for more quality affordable housing in our urban centers.  Tacoma needs to become a city of homeowners and not house renters.  Basically do you want live next door to a rental or another home owner?  Home ownership breeds strong community spirit – that and good curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street trees.
.
Q  X: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at:
http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards.  What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?
.
Answer:  I imagine I have read most if not all of them – and they have been very informative.  Well done to the CNC for leading the charge in response to this issue.
.
Q XI: What is your position in relation to the settlement proposal that the Tacoma City Council is considering regarding digital billboards?  Do you support it? If you were elected to the Tacoma City Council, would you authorize the City of Tacoma to expend financial resources to defend the Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard law?
.
Answer:  Well I did vote to proceed with the settlement precisely because it was going to require the Planning Commission to review the signage code and look into all the details of digital billboards.  Having served on the Planning Commission, and knowing the great individuals currently serving on the commission, I had complete trust in their abilities to delve into the details of the issue (something sadly we on Council are not afforded the luxury of time to allow us to typically get into the weeds).  I have been most impressed by the time and effort by the community in getting to the public hearings and submitting public comment and I have tried to make each of the Planning Commission public hearings to hear the testimony personally.
.
I have stated repeatedly that first we need to get our signage code right before we proceed to look at options for settlement or potential litigation action.  Our sign code needs to include design guidelines on the signage structure themselves in order to graphically illustrate non-conforming signs.  We also need to incorporate unequivocally clear language about the removal of non-conforming signs and have delineated a clear process for the removal of blighted signs (such as we have Code Enforcement for derelict buildings).  And for me, all non-conforming signs must come down before any new code compliant billboards are erected.
.
As for digital itself, I am not a fan of internally illuminated signs at all because they produce glare (i.e. you are seeing the light coming at you instead of reflected light off the surface of the sign).  If only indirect lighting is incorporated as a standard, I do not see how internally lit digital signs could be in compliance.
.
Q XII: Many cities near the City of Tacoma such as Fife and University Place as well as unincorporated Pierce County do not have a B&O tax which many people allege has caused businesses to move out of the City of Tacoma.  Last year, the City of Tacoma raised the B&O threshold to $250,000.  Hence, businesses in Tacoma grossing less than $250,000 pay no B&O tax.  If elected, would you support further raising the B&O tax threshold? If so, how far would you raise it?
.

Answer:  I am very proud to say that I voted a strong ‘Aye’ to the raising of the B+O threshold in my short tenure on the Council.  And yes, we need to look at ways to step-by-step remove this anti-business tax.  Having paid this tax as a small business owner, it amazes me that it is calculated on gross income.  Gross income!  I understand that this makes it simple to calculate the tax, but it totally penalizes businesses that are successful but net only a small amount of profit.  The reality is that B+O makes-up a significant amount of the City’s General Fund, so we are going to have to look at other ways to fund projects or at least look at a way of collecting a more equitable tax – and/or look at ways of funding projects and particular services outside of the General Fund.
.
Conclusion

.
It has been a privilege to serve on the City Council.
.
As a small business owner I have created jobs, maintained budgets and managed people.  As your elected City Council member I will continue to focus on job growth, controlling the line on expenses and holding the City accountable by asking tough questions.
.
I believe Tacoma is a beautiful city, but we have more work to do to improve the livability of our neighborhoods.  Through smart and responsible planning we can repair our streets and sidewalks, increase our transportation options and improve safety through-out Tacoma.
.
With your support I will continue to bring this vision forward.  I greatly appreciate your vote.

For those interested in learning more about my campaign check out http://www.voteboe.com and ‘friend’ my campaign on Face Book at ‘Vote Boe.’

To see some of my urban design thoughts for Downtown Tacoma, checkout my award winning ‘Imagine Tacoma’ blog on Exit133:  http://www.exit133.com/features/?c=Imagine_Tacoma
.
And for a little about this transition between full-time architect to full-time architect/part-time politician, check out this article from CityArts in March 2010:  http://www.cityartsonline.com/issues/tacoma/2010/03/drawing-inspiration-0 and
.
http://www.cityartsonline.com/issues/tacoma/2010/03/behind-scenes-march-tacoma-cover-shoot-david-boe
and
http://www.cityartsonline.com/issues/tacoma/2010/03/more-david-boe-interview

and Voter Pamphlet Information (page 28):  http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/xml/abtus/ourorg/aud/elections/archives/pri11/2011primaryweb.pdf

The Tacoma Armchair Approach to Cleaning Up Your Neighborhood

By Erik Bjornson

After the Tacoma Mall moved into Tacoma in 1965, much of downtown and neighborhood business centers suffered neglect and some were nearly abandoned in their entirety. The city likely struck its all time low point around the late 1970s and early 1980s (Stephen Cysewski made his infamous photo tour of downtown Tacoma in 1979).

Many of Tacoma residents who had the means, moved to the suburbs leaving many areas of the city depopulated and in poor physical condition. The homes in Tacoma’s existing neighborhoods suffered decades of disinvestment. Although some progress has been made, many neighborhoods still suffer from blight, neglect and other entrenched social problems. There are relatively large numbers of empty houses, commercial buildings and vacant and blighted lots.

Yet, we all have limited time.

A. Reduce the Many Sources of Blight To Reduce Crime And Increase the Livibility of Your Neighborhood

Studies show that much crime is opportunistic and that blightful physical characteristics give visual cues that that criminal acts can be carried out without repercussions. Thus, following the “broken window” theory, removing blight in your neighborhood can reduce crime.

A cleaner neighborhood is a signpost that neighbors have taken ownership of an area that they may be also watching out for criminal activity and will act protective of the area. It also raises property values and makes your neighborhood more of a place worth caring about.

The first 7 steps can be done from the comfort of your kitchen or computer chair

1. Have the City of Tacoma remove abandoned cars from your neighborhood streets

 

Abandoned cars facilitate criminal activities and blight the neighborhood and are easily viewable measures of the integrity of the neighborhood. Abandoned cars are often stolen cars which have been left.

From the City of Tacoma Web site:

What is an abandoned vehicle?

Abandoned vehicles are ones that have been left on City streets and may have one or more of the following characteristics:

  • Dismantled
  • In a state of disrepair (broken windows, sitting on blocks, etc.)
  • Stripped of major parts
  • Missing license plates
  • Filled with garbage
  • Sitting in the same spot for seven or more days and appears non-operational
  • In front of a residence in which owners have moved away Most abandoned vehicles are left by people unknown to those living in the neighborhood.

Call the abandoned vehicle hotline at (253) 591-5926 (auto message).

For other car issues such as:

  • Vehicles parked illegally
  • Vehicles with expired licenses
  • Recreational vehicles parked on City rights of way

Call the Tacoma Police Department non-emergency number
(253) 798-4721
and choose option 1 for those types of vehicle problems.

2. Request that the City repair streetlights in your neighborhood

There is a well established connection between the amount of light in an area and the crime rate. The perverbial “eyes on the street” cannot monitor the street activity of an area if it is pitch dark. Also, neighborhoods with burned out lights signifies a neighborhood that no one cares to maintain, monitor or protect, information all too apparent to potential criminals.

Call the City of Tacoma at (253) 591-5287. Streetlight repair requests can also be made online here.

3. Request that the City remove garbage from empty lots and from nearby properties.

Vacant lots and boarded up houses in urban areas are magnets for a large spectrum of criminal activity.” The maxim “Nature abhors a vaccum” is readily apparent in urban areas. With little monitoring, garbage often accumulates in these areas. A vacant lot filled with garbage, often dumped illegally, signals a free pass for criminal activity.

Litter, debris, overgrown vegetation can now be made online here or by phone at (253) 591-5543 or 591-5001.

From the city website:

…leaving your garbage in undesignated areas is illegal. Illegal dumping has a severe impact on Tacoma’s safety, property values and our quality of life. It also places an economic burden on the City of Tacoma when dump sites need to be cleaned up.

Examples of illegal dumping

Items dumped on public property such as city roadways, streets and alleys. Construction materials, tires, mattresses, furniture dumped on side of road.

4. Call to have abandoned shopping carts picked up

The time duration abandoned shopping carts remain in an area signify how active neighbors are in monitoring the area, maintaining the area and in the amount of control likely to be exercised. Although they are unlikely to be used in a crime, they are an instant visual que to neighbors and potential criminals alike.

Fortunately, Tacoma has some services that will recover shopping carts for free. For other areas, call the store the cart is from if possible.

For Safeway and Save-A-Lot carts on Hilltop call Cart Recovery LLD at 1-866-906-CART. Also covers Safeways located 1112 South M St, 302 S 38th and 627 72nd St E

http://www.cartrecovery.net

5. Request that the city take nuisance abatement action against blighted buildings and lots in your neighborhood.

A blighted house which is in disrepair has a higher chance of being a facilitator of criminal activity. Vacant houses often serve as the outpost for criminal activity. It also givens visual cues as to the what the standard of behavior is tolerated in a neighborhood.

Here is the City of Tacoma’s examples of nuisances:

  • Nuisances (primarily litter and debris)
  • Junk vehicles on private property
  • Minimum Building and Structures Code (dealing with the condition or existing buildings)
  • Graffiti
  • Overgrown vegetation on private property

To report any violations please call 591-5001. To report graffiti please call our 24-hour graffiti message line at 591-5691. You can also review the Nuisance Code Fact Sheet.

Low income senior and disabled home owners may be able to have their homes painted for free or at a reduced price with assistance from Paint Tacoma Beautiful which can be contacted at 383-3056 ext 105.

6. Call to have the city remove graffiti from houses and commercial buildings

Here’s an interesting quote on graffiti:

Graffiti creates fear and costs you business and customers. The sight of graffiti can also encourage people to commit acts of vandalism. Graffiti-filled areas often don’t attract shoppers, customers, or investors. Even if your building is graffiti-free, the atmosphere in the neighborhood can impact your business.

Read the city tip sheet on grafitti removal.

  • Graffiti on public or private property within the City of Tacoma: 591-5001
  • Graffiti on buses and bus shelters: 581-8050
  • Tacoma Housing Authority (Salishan Housing Development): 207-4455

If the building is masonry and designated historic or in a historic area: Historic Preservation Office: 591-5220

7) Call the police if you see crimes occurring (911)

According to the Broken Windows theory, small crimes being allowed in an area tend to escalate. Thus, one needs to be diligent in reporting smaller crimes to head off larger crimes.

Final Thoughts

The first thing to understand is that the public peace — the sidewalk and street peace — of cities is not kept primarily by the police, necessary as police are. It is kept primarily by an intricate, almost unconscious, network of voluntary controls and standards among the people themselves, and enforced by the people themselves. …. No amount of policing can enforce civilization where the normal, casual enforcement of it has broken down.”

Jane Jacobs, Death and Life of Great American Cities.

Rather than being random, significant research on crime finds that it is largely based on perceived opportunities and is situationally based. Thus, to reduce crime, one must reduce the various components which facilitate it even if, when considered by themselves, seem trivial.

If you have followed these steps, you should already be seeing improvements in your neighborhood. To gain more improvement, a bit more effort is required.

Few of us worry about crime very much until it gets out of control. Our demands for our time are already overwhelming. To make a larger difference, consider joining your neighborhood association, start a community garden and/or join a block watch. Restoring and strengthening the the social fabric in our neighborhoods is the largest defense against crime and blight we have.

To read more about Broken Window theory, order a copy of Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order And Reducing Crime In Our Communities.

Erik Bjornson is the Vice Chair of North End Neighborhood Council and a founding member of the Tacoma Sun.

This article is also available as a PDF File for future reference.

Small Worlds Theory and Livable Downtown

By Paul Sparks

What is “Small Worlds”?
Small worlds is a theory of maximum connectivity. It describes a real world phenomenon found in all types of effective communicative systems (the brain, the internet, viruses, etc). It happens when individual nodes engage in small clusters or “worlds” interacting tightly with one another (“strong links”). These nodes work together in Small Worlds while still maintaining the important connections to other nodes and clusters (“weak links”). This is illustrated in the connected clusters of the small diagram to the right. Small worlds and/or scale-free networks connect individual points with the least degree of separation between them.

What is the “Livable Community” of downtown Tacoma?
A livable community is defined by the quality of relationships shared within a particular geography. These relationships partner together for the economic, social, environmental, and civic life of the place they live. Tight-knit “small worlds” enjoy the potential benefits of proximity (context, relationality, collaboration, social capital etc.) without compromising the regional and global benefits of (transparency, knowledge, perspective, and resource sharing, etc.). They are big enough to live life in (clearly larger than a block) and small enough for a high level of spontaneous relational connectivity (clearly smaller than a region).

Short Premise
Throughout the ages most of the known world has lived with both the good and bad of life in primarily tight-knit community clusters (town, neighborhood, village, tribe, clan). Even in the few larger cities that existed, lack of mobility and primitive technology did not permit people to perceive themselves individually apart from community. With the industrial revolution and the current age of knowledge production, modern human society has worked hard to push the scale to the opposite extreme. Individuals can live as “free agent” monads without connection to local people and place. Living in what author Manuel Castells refers to as “the space of flows” we have lost the relational context that enables deep social transformation, the care of the created world, and the grounded identity of place.

The Paradigmatic Crux Of The Ages
We live at the paradigmatic crux of the ages: this is the first time in history that we have the capacity to live free from the destructive ignorance and tyrannies found in the isolated communities of old. It is also the first time since the history of the industrial revolution that we are coming to realize that there are crucial problems that can only be solved by a commitment to both worlds: that of local livable community and that of regional and global connectivity.

Downtown Tacoma
Downtown Tacoma is at a critical moment for shaping its future in an exemplary way. Three variables can make all the difference:

(1) A commitment to design and shape our built environment in ways that allow community members the freedom to live life (work, play, sleep, eat, relate) in one community.

(2) A commitment as members to develop more holistic patterns of life within the livable community context of downtown.

(3) A commitment to collaborate together with the other livable communities of Tacoma for the vitality and sustainability of all.

Want To Learn More?
Small Worlds theory is one of the many emerging scientific models that point us toward this local/global (glocal) model of life. (Part 2: Coming Soon)

Small World – Just for fun Learning Party Links
Link 1: Join the Grand Experiment (become the laboratory):
http://smallworld.columbia.edu/index.html
Link 2: Power Point Learning (watch the slides):
http://www.legendmud.org/raph/gaming/smallworlds_files/frame.htm
Link 3: Amateur Learning Party (you play six degrees):
http://www.canyouhearmeyet.com/small_world_primer/small_world_entry.html
Charts and Graphs: (See the incredible work of John Cage)
http://www.sojamo.de/iv/index.php?n=10&ci=003-01