Teen Sentenced in Gault Middle School Arson

Gault Middle School, 1940; Tacoma Public Library Collection.

A juvenile defendant was charged with Arson in the First Degree in Washington State Superior Court for burning down Gault Middle School in Tacoma’s McKinley Hill Neighborhood, according to court records obtained by the Tacoma Sun.

Although three 15 year-olds were initially arrested by Gig Harbor police for the crime, only two faced charges in January 2024 – a male and his girlfriend. The male was placed on house detention with electronic home monitoring until the court hearing. The girlfriend was released to her parents.

Responding to a guilty plea offered in October 2024, a deal was struck in December 2024. It was decided that due to the fire not having any victims and the lack of criminal history of the defendant, a standard sentence of 129 weeks in a juvenile rehabilitation center be rejected in favor of a 20 day sentence with 180 days of electronic home monitoring (with credit of 113 days), plus 12 months probation.

Built in 1926, Gault Middle School was shuttered in 2009 by the the Tacoma School District citing low enrollment. Already suffering from years of deferred maintenance, the property became a magnet for break-ins and criminal behavior. Sounding an alarm to raise awareness about the situation, local non-profit organization Historic Tacoma placed the building on their Watch List in 2023. During the 15 years the school had been closed, the Tacoma Fire Department responded to multiple fires and emergencies on the property before the total loss 2024 fire.

* The Tacoma Sun makes it a practice to not name juveniles in court cases unless charged as an adult.

Iconic Tacoma Waterfront Restaurant Johnny’s Set to Reopen

photo: Yelp

The iconic waterfront location of Johnny’s Dock is set to reopen as Johnny’s Dock Seafood and Grill. The original Johnny’s served classic American and had been open for decades before closing permanently during pandemic. The new owners, Gurinderjit Singh Purewal and Poojadeep Purewal, are reopening Johnny’s and doing an East Indian take with a seafood and grill menu. They also run Tasty India in Oak Harbor and Clay Pot in Seattle. In addition to the regular menu, they will have a pizza menu featuring their homemade dough. The restaurant will retain a full bar which is separate from the main restaurant seating area. The owners commented that their grease traps are installed and serviced and that they are waiting on final inspections from the Health Department which could come as early as June. Address: 1900 East D Street

Highest Paid Tacoma School District Employees

The highest paid 24 Tacoma School District employees had a combined base salary of $6.5 million dollars for the school year 2023-2024, the most recent year data is available. This amount does not include other benefits and compensation.

NameTitle2023-24
Garcia, JoshuaSuperintendent$385,757
Pace, ToniDeputy/Assist. Supt.$348,121
Nolan, LisaDeputy/Assist. Supt.$337,771
Trueblood, ReneeDeputy/Assist. Supt.$317,278
Medina, RosalindDirector/Supervisor$315,616
Williams, ChristopherDirector/Supervisor$298,938
Edmond, EricDeputy/Assist. Supt.$287,013
Ketler, JonathanSecondary Principal$283,571
Rich, ScottOther District Admin.$278,085
Hostetter, DouglasOther District Admin.$276,477
Aldridge, MorrisDirector/Supervisor$274,767
Deaderick, StevenDirector/Supervisor$274,167
Ray, JulieOther District Admin.$263,510
Gbenro, Abdul MalikProfessional$258,570
Marshall, ShannonSecondary Principal$257,519
Blanchfield-Johnso, CynthiaElementary Principal$252,722
Hoseth, KarlSecondary Principal$251,695
Ness, LysandraSecondary Principal$251,410
Stewart, ColletteDirector/Supervisor$250,544
Kulaas, AdamOther District Admin.$249,268
Froembling, ReneeSecondary Principal$248,263
Blauser, VinceOther District Admin.$245,599
Neil, JamesOther District Admin.$245,429
TOTAL$6,452,090
source: https://fiscal.wa.gov/K12/K12Salaries

Moonies in Tacoma

photo: Jung Yeon-Je/AFP/Getty images

Cancelled in Japan

Last month, a court in Japan revoked the tax-exempt status of the Unification Church. According to BBC News, part of the case against the church stemmed from claims that its members were required to make huge financial contributions and other financial sacrifices. The church was created in 1954 under the name “Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity” but recently rebranded as “Family Federation for World Peace and Unification.” Its members are popularly called “Moonies” after its founder Sun Myung Moon. The church gained notoriety starting in the 1960s for its mass wedding ceremonies. And while the court ruling in Japan will likely be appealed, it does bring to question the activities of the Unification Church in this country.

Demolition of Historic Seattle Mansion

photo: MOHAI

The Unification church made local headlines last year when it announced they were selling a historic mansion in Seattle for $7 million dollars. Located in the exclusive Windermere neighborhood, the mansion was built in 1907 by Rolland Denny, a member of an early Seattle pioneer family. Named “Loch Kelden” the property was purchased by the Unification church in 1974 for $175,000 for use as a retreat center. Along with the sale announcement came news that the church intended on demolishing the structure as the developer buyers were interested only in the land and not a historic mansion. By having the church file for demolition, the developers were able to take advantage of a loophole in state law that allows churches to bypass processes which protect registered historic properties.

Meanwhile in Tacoma

photo: Pierce County Assessor’s Office

More locally, the Unification Church appears to own a 3-acre property in Tacoma at 5230 South Mullen. According to information obtained from the County Assessor’s website, the property has a 3 bed/2 bath home and is registered to “Holy Spirit Association, Malloch David D.A., 5230 S Mullen St, Tacoma.” An online search did not result in a church existing at the location which was confirmed by visiting in person. A visit to the site along a road marked “private” did not reveal any signage or indication that it was church property. The assessed value of the property according to the County is $806,600 and would have generated $8,789 in property tax this year.

Property at 5230 South Mullen in Tacoma

BBC News article on Japan court case: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge1lr7225yo

Seattle Times article on the Loch Kelden mansion: https://www.seattletimes.com/pacific-nw-magazine/a-piece-of-seattle-history-disappears-with-the-demolition-of-loch-kelden/

HARBOR MAY BE CLOSED

Tacoma Times story from June 4, 1915:

Tacoma is facing one of the most serious municipal crises in its history.

During the last two weeks Uncle Sam has demanded a rearrangement of the local sewage system, to cost at least $500,000, and is sending one of the heads of the U.S. health bureau to Tacoma next week to make its demands explicit, it was learned today.

The city has not one cent for the work – will have no money until next year. But the threat of Uncle Sam means that this port will be put on the United States health department’s “black list” as an unclean harbor.

If the government wishes to press its demand, ocean traffic can be prevented from coming here.

The trouble arises over the fact that a sewer on 15th street empties close to the city docks, and sewage floats about the entire city channel continuously.

To rearrange the sewage system, a new trunk sewer must be built from 15th street under the city to the site of the old gravity coal bunkers, where tide currents could sweep it out to sea.

The council was informed today that Assistant Surgeon General W. C. Ruther of Washington D.C., was coming to Tacoma next Thursday to demand a change in the system.

Commissioner Woods told the council the necessary sewer tunnel would cost half a million.

The only apparent solution is a bond election, and immediate construction work.

The city council, though excited over the situation, will wait to hear the verbal message of Dr. Ruther before deciding what action top take.

Woods Wrathy.

Although worried over the outcome of the government’s action, Commissioner Woods, who has charge of the city’s sewage system, was highly incensed over the federal threats today.

“Is Tacoma going to let the federal health department come in here and run out port for us, or are we going to run it ourselves?” he demanded of the city council.

“The government is butting into the affairs of every city in the country, and now it wants to put us so the expense of half a million dollars on a mere health technicality. We can get along temporarily with our present sewage system. Why should the government come in and dictate to us like this? It’s an injustice, but we simply can’t help ourselves. We have to do what the United States tells us to.”

At Inopportune Time.

This action comes just as Tacoma is taking the lead among all American ports in export trade to its handling of war orders for Vladivostok. Already nearly $4,000,000 in exports have been sent out this month. Unless the interference of the U.S. officialdom is successful, June should be a $10,000,000 month.

How Much Has the City of Tacoma Spent This Year? The Answer Will SHOCK You!

According to information from the City of Tacoma, the city council has approved over $135,000,000 so far this year. While a bulk was spent on payroll ($67 million), other expenditures included: $3.5 million to the Rescue Mission, $1 million to Stronghold Armored for armored transport services, $2.5 million to Government Portfolio Advisors for investment advisory services, and $19.5 million to Staff Pro for parking, security, and guest services at the Tacoma Dome and Greater Tacoma Convention Center.

source: https://cityoftacoma.legistar.com/Legislation.aspx

On This Day: Tacoma landmark, Top of the Ocean Restaurant, Torched by Crime Syndicate

On this day in 1977, David Levage who was hired by a local crime syndicate dumped a dozen cans of paint thinner onto premier Tacoma waterfront restaurant, Top of The Ocean. Built in the 1940s, the structure was instantly engulfed in flames once ignited. This arson was connected to a number of other suspicious nightclub fires which resulted in a Federal grand jury racketeering case that brought down local crime bosses and Pierce County Sheriff, George Janovich.

Learn more about the history of the Top of The Ocean: https://www.historylink.org/File/9818#:~:text=Top%20of%20the%20Ocean%20Restaurant,%2D%20HistoryLink.org

Learn more about David Levage here: https://tacomahistory.live/2018/03/11/top-of-the-ocean-part-two/

Learn about the Federal racketeering case: https://www.historylink.org/File/9728

Tacoma Multifamily Market Update for Q1 2025

photo: Rook Apartments

By Morgan Alexander

Despite the current uncertainty in the economy, the Tacoma commercial multifamily real estate market continues to show resilience – although at a slower than typical pace. Another sign of the times is a drastic decline in new projects. Up until a year ago, one could see many construction cranes over downtown. Today there are none. And while incentives such as free rent are often used to help attract new tenants, the amount of free rent now being offered is especially noteworthy, with many offering more than two months free rent. Representing 1,524 new units, the following is a summary of recently completed multifamily projects located in and around the downtown core.

MIDTOWN

Featuring a fireside lounge, rooftop bar, and outdoor kitchen cabana, The Rook Apartments, at 1502 Fawcett Ave is filling up. The 368-unit building is sitting at a 33% vacancy rate since opening late last year. 

The Moraine, a 160 unit building at 1402 Tacoma Ave South, is slowly filling up since opening Spring of 2024 with a 56% vacancy. The Moraine features a sundeck and is pet friendly.

The Analog Tacoma at 411 S 15th St is a 115 unit building that opened March of 2023. Vacancy here is holding at a tight 6%. The Analog features a rooftop deck, retro lounge & courtyard, and is pet friendly.

The Ellis at 1909 Fawcett Ave is a 174 unit building located within walking distance to UWT. Since opening last Spring, the building is slowly filling up with a vacancy rate of 39%.

DOWNTOWN

The Astor, also known as the historic Washington Building, has been open for a few years now and is holding at a vacancy rate of 7%. Originally finished just before the Great Depression  in 1925, the Astor is the second tallest building in Tacoma 

BREWERY DISTRICT

After a rocky start, the 178 unit Jefferson Flats project at 2515 S Jefferson Ave opened in the Spring of 2024 and is sitting at a respectable 6% vacancy.

DOME DISTRICT

Cornus House located at 2502-2512 Pacific Ave opened in December 2024. The 199 unit  micro-apartment building quickly filled up and has a 7% vacancy rate

Data source: http://www.apartments.com

Tacoma City Council 2024 Report Card

It’s a difficult time to be focused on local government considering all the chaos in the other Washington right now. However, we can’t lose attention of what is going on in our own back yard with our city council. In theory, local government is where the rubber hits the street. In practice, it varies quite a bit. In this annual wrap-up of laws passed, we take a look at what the city council has been up to. In short, it can be answered that they haven’t been up to a lot – if you’re measuring by laws passed which is one of their primary purposes.

Out of 84 laws passed last year, only two were sponsored by council members. The rest came from city staff. Here’s a summary of the laws passed by the council:

ORDINANCE 28963, passed 4/30/2024: An ordinance amending Chapter 8.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to Disorderly Conduct, by amending Section 8.12.150, entitled “Littering prohibited – Penalties”, to align more closely with state law; and providing for enforcement, and establishing civil and criminal penalties for violations. [Deputy Mayor Hines]

ORDINANCE 29014, passed 12/4/2024: An ordinance amending Title 1 of the Municipal Code, relating to Administration and Personnel, by adding a new chapter entitled “Climate and Sustainability Commission”, to establish a Climate and Sustainability Commission and appoint current members of the Sustainable Tacoma Commission to the new Commission. [Council Member Walker]

Granted, nearly all of the laws passed by city staff were routine monotonous updates that probably could only come from staff. However, with a plethora of issues our city is facing, it makes one wonder why there isn’t more activity from the city council.


BY THE NUMBERS
2024 – Total laws passed: 84. Total laws sponsored by city council members: 2
2023 – Total laws passed: 66. Total laws sponsored by city council members: 5
2022 – Total laws passed: 66. Total laws sponsored by city council members: 5

Former Seahawk Marcus Trufant to Open Downtown Comedy Club

It’s official, according to a recent State Liquor Control Board filing, a comedy club backed by former Seahawk Marcus Trufant is opening in downtown Tacoma at 1530 Pacific Ave. The space is located in the Marriot Hotel and was formerly used as an events center. The club, Nate Jackson’s Super Funny Comedy Club was formerly located in the Holiday Inn located at 8402 S. Hosmer St. An opening date has not been announced.


Tacoma City Council 2023 Report Card

One way that a city council can be judged is on the output of its work. A major function of a city council’s work is creating policies that both guide the city manager and provide a vision for the city. And while it is difficult to quantify “vision”, we can quantify the number of ordinances (city laws) passed that originated from a city council member. 

In 2023, there were a total of 66 ordinances passed by the Tacoma City Council. Of those, five were sponsored by city council members with the remaining ordinances coming from various city departments. The summaries of the five ordinances follow:

ORD28799 created 12/1/2021; passed 2/7/2023 – (Continued from the meeting of December 14, 2021) An ordinance amending, renaming, and renumbering Chapter 9.16 of the Municipal Code, relating to Streets and Sidewalks – Keeping Clean, by adding two new sections, to prevent obstruction and damage to sidewalks from the loading, unloading, and transport of goods; and amending the penalty provision to align with Tacoma’s Uniform Enforcement Code. [Council Member Ushka]

ORD28894 passed 7/11/2023 – An ordinance amending Chapter 1.95 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Rental Housing Code, to require landlords to comply with health and safety laws; have a City business license before increasing rent or evicting tenants; set limits on late fees for rent and on pet deposits; require 120-day notice to raise rent; add new regulations for shared housing; and standardize screening criteria for the amount of tenant income required to qualify for housing, for reviewing a tenant’s criminal history, and acceptable identification. [Mayor Woodards]

ORD28922 12/5/2023 – An ordinance amending Titles 8 and 17 of the Municipal Code, relating to Animal Control and Public Safety, by amending Section 17.02.140, entitled “Public disturbance noise and public nuisance noise made by an animal”, and Section 8.12.060, entitled “Public disturbance noises”, to revise requirements for enforcement of an unlawful action and to remove the criminal misdemeanor charge for public disturbance and public nuisance noise made by an animal. [Council Member Hines]

ORD28923 12/5/2023 – An ordinance amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code, relating to Animal Control, by adding a new Section 17.02.155, entitled “Cat Declawing”, to establish a ban on performing a procedure that results in the partial or complete declawing of a cat except when conducted by a licensed veterinarian for a therapeutic purpose, effective March 31, 2024. [Council Member Hines]

ORD28930 12/19/2023 – An ordinance amending Chapter 6A.30 of the Municipal Code, relating to Business and Occupation Tax, by adding a new Section 6A.30.067, entitled “Job Credit – Work Opportunity”, to provide a new $1,000 job tax credit for employers adding a new position and filling the position with an individual with a disability, as identified through the vocational referral in the federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit. [Council Member Blocker]


By the Numbers:
Total ordinances passed: 66
Total ordinances sponsored by city council members: 5 
Council Member Blocker: 1
Council Member Hines: 2
Council Member Ushka: 1
Mayor Woodards: 1

Of note, none of the ordinances put forward by council members or city staff deal directly with the top social issues of the day: affordable housing and homelessness, public safety, increased gang activity, and economic development. A full summary of all the ordinances passed in 2023 follows at the end of this article.

So, besides examining quantifiable output, are there other ways we should judge the effectiveness of a city council? This question was posed to former local elected leaders. The responses received by the publication date follow:



Julie Anderson, Tacoma City Council, 2004-2009; Pierce County Auditor, 2009-2022

Attendance.  At council meetings as well as the standing committee meetings.

Communication.  Does the CM have a newsletter that provides regular updates on hot topics and offer ways for citizens to be engaged (upcoming hearings, please write to me, please join me for a town hall).

Representation.  If the council member is appointed to a regional council (example: PSRC) or governance board  (Sound Transit), do they report back to the council and community? Is there a feedback loop?

Engagement.  I’m not talking about ribbon cuttings and “glamour shot” events.  Rather, does the council member go to neighborhood council meetings, community summits, civic discussions?  These are crucial to listening, learning, and making oneself accessible.

Policy.  Does the CM sponsor meaningful, substantive ordinances (as opposed to symbolic Does the CM appear to have read their materials and understand the content?  This is evidenced by the questions that they ask (are the questions pertinent, designed to illuminate, or are they asking questions that are clearly answered in the bill). This is also evidenced by amendments that they offer.   

Good relations. Although local government positions are supposed to be nonpartisan, it is well-known who affiliates with R’s and D’s. Does the CM’s initiatives and ordinances have support from a mixture of political perspectives? Is there negotiation? Likewise, does the CM refrain from partisan rhetoric and grandstanding and sponsoring “wedge issue” ordinances?



Connie Ladenburg, Tacoma City Council, 2002-2010; Washington State House of Representatives 2011-2013; Pierce County Council, 2013-2021 

They are doing a good job if they are addressing the needs of the community. Keep in mind that not everyone in a community agrees on how the needs should be met or what the priority of needs are. And that is a challenge for a council and its members. The same kind of disagreement can happen within the body of the Council. First, Council members need to just look around. Council members are also residents. They see graffiti, crime, homelessness, empty storefronts, and a degrading environment. Then get out and listen to their constituents and stakeholders. Not only will they hear their concerns but often they have solutions. Next, do research. Find out what other communities are doing. The next step is what is often missing. Go back to the residents and stakeholders and share what has been learned before a final decision has been made.

Once priorities are set and strategies are developed the Council must get the work out. This is more difficult today than when I was on the City Council when we had a robust newspaper. As you know, our means of communication have changed but I don’t think our government officials have. Our elected officials should be utilizing all means of communication – oral, written, visual, electronic. This is where failure happens.

The Council has done some good things, but the message is not getting to the community. Here is an example… I live in Southend, near the now famous Hosmer Business district. A year or two ago it was reported that this is the highest crime district in the City with car break-ins, drug dealing and use, prostitution, even some murders. Much of the activity was happening in and around the area Motels. This area had its share of homeless tents along the Hosmer corridor, even slightly encroaching into the neighborhood. Not good news. When crime stats are gathered it is by a larger geographic area than a street i.e census track, neighborhood council, or Council district. I live about a mile from this part of Hosmer and yet the reputation of my neighborhood was affected by the crime in the 8 blocks or so of Hosmer. In the last few years, many of the motels have been turned into permanent supportive housing and affordable housing. There is no evidence of home tents and crime numbers are improving. And yet there is still a perception that Hosmer is unsafe with people saying there is no way they would go to that part of the city. Why lack of communication!

It is difficult for a citizen to know if a council is doing the job they are elected to do. It is up to the Council to let them know what has been done. Only then, will a person be able to judge whether the job meets the needs of the community.



John W. Ladenburg Sr., Tacoma City Council, 1982-1986; Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, 1986-2000; Pierce County Executive, 2001-2009

I judge an elected official on what they actually get done.  Many will campaign on issues they or the public feel important.  Some will actually make legislative proposals to address that issue.  Some will actually work with and persuade other elected to work with them and pass legislation.  The question for me is usually effectiveness.  Does that official make the effort to get things done or do they complain that others won’t agree with them or work with them.  The best not only lead on issues, but they actually perform on issues.  I have found that the best were the ones who ran for office to get something done and spent as much time as possible trying to get it done.  Some did get progress done by finding a way to get others onboard.  I also like those who realize that maybe you can’t get it all done right now, but part is better.  We have had too many who were so set on their agenda, they got nothing done because it was not perfect.  The old saying is correct, “Perfect is the enemy of the Good.”  So, my advice to citizens not only to ask your elected officials what issues they believe are important, but ask what they have done about it and what they intend to do.  If their answer is they tried and others defeated it, ask how they plan to change that.  If they say they don’t have the power to do anything, they probably don’t want the controversy of battle to get it done.  A good elected official is not afraid to take a stand or afraid to tell you where they stand.


City of Tacoma ordinances passed in 2023

File #File CreatedFinal ActionTitle
ORD2879912/1/20212/7/2023(Continued from the meeting of December 14, 2021) An ordinance amending, renaming, and renumbering Chapter 9.16 of the Municipal Code, relating to Streets and Sidewalks – Keeping Clean, by adding two new sections, to prevent obstruction and damage to sidewalks from the loading, unloading, and transport of goods; and amending the penalty provision to align with Tacoma’s Uniform Enforcement Code. [Council Member Ushka]
ORD2886311/15/20222/7/2023An ordinance vacating two portions of East “N” Street on opposite sides in the same block, lying north of East 25th Street, to facilitate expanded and future use of the property. (M & A Investments Three, LLC; File No. 124.1427) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD2886711/28/20224/4/2023An ordinance vacating a portion of South Pine Street public right-of-way, for extended property area and potential expansion of the existing business use. (LBA LVF VII-COMPANY XXIII, LLC; File No. 124.1438) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD2886812/19/20221/24/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Human Resources Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Senior Labor Relations Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288691/3/20232/21/2023An ordinance reclassifying an approximately 0.34-acre site, located at 8441 South “C” Street, from an R-2 Single-Family Dwelling District to a C-1 General Neighborhood Commercial District, to allow for the construction of a 12-unit apartment building. (Royal Construction Group, LLC; File No. LU22-0134) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD288701/12/20232/14/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Custodial and Building Maintenance Unit, and the Tacoma, Washington, City and Pierce County Employees Local Number 120 of the Washington State Council of County and City Employees, AFSCME, AFL-CIO. [Dylan Carlson, Senior Labor Relations Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288711/30/20232/14/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay for the nonrepresented classification of Municipal Court Judge – Pro Tem. [Kari L. Louie, Assistant Director; Shelby Fritz, Director, Human Resources]
ORD288722/3/20233/7/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 13.06 of the Municipal Code, relating to Zoning, by amending Section 13.06.070, entitled “Overlay Districts”, to enact a moratorium on certain uses within the South Tacoma Groundwater Protection District, for an initial period of up to one year. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD288732/16/20233/14/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the Tacoma Firefighters Union, Local 31, the Professional Public Safety Management Association, and the District Lodge No. 160 on behalf of Local Lodge No. 282 of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Supervisors’ Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288772/23/20235/16/2023An ordinance vacating portions of South 23rd Street and South Cushman Avenue, to cure existing building encroachments. (SoHo Properties Inc. dba SoHo Properties 2 Inc; File No. 124.1439) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD288762/23/20239/19/2023An ordinance vacating a portion of South “L” Street, lying north of South 5th Street, and a portion of South 4th Street, lying west of South “L” Street, to facilitate a healthcare redevelopment project. (MultiCare Health System; File No. 124.1426) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD288752/23/202310/31/2023An ordinance vacating a portion of South Madison Street, lying south of South 40th Street, and a portion of South 50th Street, lying west of South Madison Street, to facilitate development of an industrial park and associated storm ponds, utility extensions, and parking facilities. (Bridge Point Tacoma, LLC; File Nos. 124.1432 and 124.1442) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD288743/2/20233/21/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17, Tacoma Police Department Non-Commissioned Management Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288783/9/20234/4/2023An ordinance amending Subtitle 6A of the Municipal Code, relating to the Tax Code, by amending Chapter 6A.130, entitled “Local Solid Waste Customer Excise Tax”, to create an exemption for charges to customers who take solid waste to private solid waste disposal facilities consistent with the existing exemption for customers who take solid waste to public solid waste disposal facilities, retroactive to April 1, 2023. [Danielle Larson, Tax and License Manager; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD288794/5/20234/25/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Clerical Unit; and to create the non-represented classifications of Community Service Officer and Labor Negotiator, Public Safety. [Kari L. Louie, Assistant Director; Shelby Fritz, Director, Human Resources]
ORD288804/18/20238/8/2023An ordinance vacating a portion of undeveloped South 35th Street, west of South “G” Street, to facilitate expansion of public school sports fields and parking. (Tacoma School District No. 10; File No. 124.1437) [Jeff H. Capell, Hearing Examiner]
ORD288814/19/20235/16/2023A supplemental ordinance authorizing the execution of an amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement related to the City’s Electric System Subordinate Revenue Note, Series 2020 (Taxable); and delegating the authority to approve the final terms of the amendment. [Michelle Brown, Financial Planning Supervisor; Chris Robinson, Power Superintendent]
ORD288854/24/20235/23/2023An ordinance amending the Capital Budget of the City for fiscal years 2023-2024 for recommended budget adjustments and Council-approved capital projects with outstanding balances. [Katie Johnston, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD288844/24/20235/23/2023An ordinance amending the Biennial Operating Budget of the City for fiscal years 2023-2024 for recommended budget adjustments that were not identifiable before the approval of the 2023-2024 adopted budget. [Katie Johnston, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD288834/25/20236/6/2023An ordinance granting a non-exclusive ten-year telecommunications franchise agreement to Sprint Communications Company, L.P., to construct, operate, and maintain a telecommunications system in City right-of-way areas. [Jeff Lueders, Division Manager; Amy Clancy, Director, Media and Communications Office]
ORD288824/26/20235/23/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, the non represented classifications of Municipal Court Judge and Court Commissioner, and other changes to reflect the organizational structure. [Kari L. Louie, Assistant Director; Shelby Fritz, Director, Human Resources]
ORD288895/19/20236/20/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Tacoma Power Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288865/23/20236/13/2023An ordinance declaring the public necessity for, and providing for the acquisition by eminent domain of certain properties located between McKinley Avenue and Portland Avenue, to construct the pedestrian, signal safety, and road improvements in connection with the East 64th Street, Phase 2 Improvement Project. [Troy Stevens, Senior Real Estate Specialist; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE, Interim Director, Public Works]
ORD288875/23/20236/13/2023An ordinance amending Title 8 of the Municipal Code, relating to Public Safety, by adding a new Chapter 8.190, entitled “Drug Crimes”, and repealing in its entirety Chapter 8.29, entitled “Drug Paraphernalia”, to comply with state law. [Keith Echterling, Deputy City Attorney; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288905/26/20236/20/2023An ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of one or more series of limited tax general obligation refunding bonds, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $32,000,000, to defease and refund certain outstanding general obligation bonds of the City and to pay costs of issuing the bonds; providing the form of the bonds; and delegating the authority to approve the final terms of the bonds. [Michael San Soucie, City Treasurer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD288935/30/20236/27/2023An ordinance adopting the Six-Year Comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program amended for the years 2023 and 2024-2029. [Jennifer Kammerzell, Assistant Division Manager; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE, Interim Director, Public Works]
ORD288885/30/20236/27/2023An ordinance amending the non-exclusive 20-year franchise agreement with Rainier Connect North LLC, to transfer the agreement to Alphaboost Purchaser, LLC, to construct, operate, maintain, and provide cable television services in the City. [Jeff Lueders, Division Manager; Amy Clancy, Director, Media and Communications Office]
ORD288915/31/20236/20/2023An ordinance amending Amended Ordinance No. 26749, which granted the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority d.b.a. Sound Transit, a non-exclusive Right of Use Agreement, by adding Exhibits “E” and “F” to establish rights, duties, and responsibilities related to maintenance, repair, or replacement of a portion of a 24-inch stormwater main located under the Link Light Rail Expansion Project Overhead Contact System within Stadium Way. [Corey Newton, P.E., Division Manager, Planning and Development Services; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE, Interim Director, Public Works]
ORD288926/1/20236/27/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Court Clerks Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288956/9/20237/18/2023(First and Final Reading) An ordinance approving and confirming the Final Assessment Roll for Local Improvement District No. 8640, which provided for the construction of asphalt concrete alley pavement, with storm drainage at the following locations: 1) The alley between Proctor Street and Madison Street from North 38th Street north 130 feet, more or less, thence east to Proctor Street; 2) The alley between North 35th Street and North 36th Street from Warner Street to Puget Sound Avenue; 3) The alley between North 21st Street and North 22nd Street from Washington Street to Adams St
ORD288946/21/20237/11/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.95 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Rental Housing Code, to require landlords to comply with health and safety laws; have a City business license before increasing rent or evicting tenants; set limits on late fees for rent and on pet deposits; require 120-day notice to raise rent; add new regulations for shared housing; and standardize screening criteria for the amount of tenant income required to qualify for housing, for reviewing a tenant’s criminal history, and acceptable identification. [Mayor Woodards]
ORD288966/27/20237/25/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the Teamsters Local Union No. 117, General Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288976/30/20238/1/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17, and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Supervisors’ Unit. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]
ORD288987/5/20238/1/2023An ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of Regional Water Supply System revenue refunding bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $40,850,000, to provide funds to defease and/or refund all or a portion of the City’s Regional Water Supply System Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2013; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds, and appointing the City’s designated representatives to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and approving an amendment to the Repayment Agreement. [Lyna Vo, Senior Economist; Scott Dewhirst, Water S
ORD288997/5/20238/1/2023An ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of water system revenue refunding bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $75,000,000, to provide funds to defease and/or refund all or a portion of the City’s Water System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, 2005 and Water System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, 2013; and fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds, and appointing the City’s designated representatives to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds. [Lyna Vo, Senior Economist; Scott Dewhirst, Water Superintendent]
ORD289007/21/20238/29/2023An ordinance granting a non-exclusive ten-year telecommunications franchise agreement to Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, to construct, operate, maintain, and provide cable television services in the City. [Jeff Lueders, Division Manager; Amy Clancy, Director, Media and Communications Office]
ORD289037/24/20238/15/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 13.06 of the Municipal Code, relating to Zoning, to support the expanded use of shipping containers for temporary and accessory uses, as part of the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code, as recommended by the Planning Commission. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD289057/24/20238/15/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 13.06 of the Municipal Code, relating to Zoning, by amending various sections to clarify commercial zoning design and development standards that would apply to projects seeking to utilize the Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program in neighborhood commercial areas, as part of the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code, as recommended by the Planning Commission. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD289017/24/20238/15/2023An ordinance amending the Future Land Use Map for the Mor Furniture site, located at 1824 South 49th Street, to change from a Low-Scale Residential land use designation to a General Commercial land use designation, and amending the Parks and Recreation Facilities Map to remove the subject site, as part of the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD289067/24/20238/15/2023An ordinance amending various chapters in Title 1, relating to Administration and Personnel, and Title 13, relating to the Land Use Regulatory Code of the Municipal Code, to adopt minor code amendments, as part of the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code, as recommended by the Planning Commission. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD289027/24/20238/15/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 13.06 of the Municipal Code, relating to Zoning, to expand the allowed use of electric fences in association with outdoor storage in various zoning districts, with associated development standards, as part of the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD289047/24/20238/15/2023An ordinance amending Chapters 13.01 and 13.06 of the Municipal Code, relating to Definitions and Zoning, to clarify delivery-only retail business use and standards, as part of the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code, as recommended by the Planning Commission. [Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD289087/26/20238/22/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 8.30A of the Municipal Code, relating to Chronic Public Nuisance, by amending Section 8.30A.020, entitled “Definitions”, to add multiple state law crimes and to include violations of the City’s Rental Housing Code to the definition of a nuisance activity, and by amending Section 8.30A.040, entitled “Correction agreement”, to add an execution deadline. [Keith Echterling, Deputy City Attorney; Avery Moore, Police Chief]
ORD289078/2/20238/22/2023A substitute ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for nonrepresented classifications, to reflect the organizational structure. [Kari L. Louie, Assistant Director; Shelby Fritz, Director, Human Resources]
ORD289099/14/202310/17/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Tacoma Power Unit, and Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17. [Kari L. Louie, Assistant Director; Shelby Fritz, Director, Human Resources]
ORD2891010/9/202310/31/2023An ordinance amending Title 6 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Tax and License Code, by amending Chapter 6B.10, entitled “General License Provisions”, and Chapter 6B.20, entitled “Annual Business License”, to decrease the late filing penalty on business license fees, strengthen license requirements and enforcement tools, and clarify administrative provisions of the licensing code; and by amending various chapters to update language and address areas of inconsistency. [Danielle Larson, Tax and License Manager; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891110/16/202311/21/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 12.06 of the Municipal Code, relating to Electric Energy – Regulations and Rates, to add a new Section 12.06.266, entitled “Very large load service of 10 aMW or more – Schedule VLL”, and by amending various sections to align with the new Schedule VLL, effective January 1, 2024. [Jing Liu, Rates and Data Analyst; Chris Robinson, Power Superintendent]
ORD2891710/24/202311/28/2023An ordinance modifying the 2023-2024 Biennial Operating Budget to appropriate funds for contractual obligations, transfers, and other budget adjustments; authorize interfund transfers and contributions; and accept, deposit, and appropriate miscellaneous donations, contributions, and/or fees. [Reid Bennion, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891410/24/202311/28/2023An ordinance fixing the amount of the Ad Valorem tax levies necessary to identify the amount of the estimated revenues from property tax levies to match estimated expenditures for debt service and other funding requirements. [Reid Bennion, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891310/24/202311/28/2023An ordinance authorizing an increase in the Ad Valorem general property tax revenue collection in terms of both dollars and percentage for the general property tax levy in 2024. [Reid Bennion, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891510/24/202311/28/2023An ordinance authorizing an increase for the Emergency Medical Services property tax levy in terms of both dollars and percentage. [Reid Bennion, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891610/24/202311/28/2023An ordinance fixing the amount of the Emergency Medical Services levy necessary to identify the amount of the estimated revenues from the property tax levy to match estimated expenditures for debt service and other funding requirements. [Reid Bennion, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891810/24/202311/28/2023An ordinance modifying the 2023-2024 Capital Budget to recognize changes in transfers, additional revenues, and budget adjustments. [Reid Bennion, Budget Officer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2891211/2/202311/28/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 12.10 of the Municipal Code, relating to Water – Regulations and Rates, by amending Section 12.10.301, entitled “Fire hydrant services fee”, and Section 12.10.400, entitled “Rates – Inside and outside City limits”, effective January 1, 2024. [Jodi Collins, Financial Stewardship Manager; Scott Dewhirst, Water Superintendent]
ORD2892111/8/202312/19/2023An ordinance amending the current non-exclusive Right of Use Agreement and Franchise with Pierce Transit, extending the renewal term an additional five-years and amending the current expiration from January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2029, for transit-related infrastructure within City rights-of-way. [Joseph Romero, Senior Real Estate Specialist; Ramiro A. Chavez, P.E. PgMP, Director, Public Works]
ORD2891911/8/202312/5/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 3.11 of the Municipal Code, relating to Emergency Medical Transportation, by amending Section 3.11.060, entitled “Patient transportation service rates”, to restore the Emergency Medical Services levy and allow the levy to pay for medical transport charges incurred by qualified City residents, as passed by voters in Proposition 1 in the August 1, 2023, Primary Election. [Teresa Green, Senior Business Services Manager; Toryono Green, Fire Chief]
ORD2892011/9/202312/5/2023A supplemental ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of one or more series of Electric System Revenue and Refunding Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $225,000,000, to provide funds to finance and refinance capital improvements to the electric system, redeem certain obligations of the electric system, and pay costs of issuance for the bonds; and delegating the authority to approve the final terms of the bonds. [Michelle Brown, Financial Planning Supervisor; Chris Robinson, Power Superintendent]
ORD2892511/16/202312/12/2023A substitute ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for certain represented and nonrepresented employees; and changes in classifications to reflect the organizational structure. [Kari L. Louie, Assistant Director; Shelby Fritz, Director, Human Resources]
ORD2892411/16/202312/12/2023An ordinance authorizing the annexation of the Manitou Potential Annexation Area, located near Lakewood Drive West and 66th Street West, to the City of Tacoma, effective April 1, 2024, as set forth in the Interlocal Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding with Pierce County executed on December 15, 2021. [Wesley Rhodes, Senior Planner; Peter Huffman, Director, Planning and Development Services]
ORD2892611/17/202312/12/2023An ordinance amending Title 9 of the Municipal Code, relating to Public Ways, by repealing Chapters 9.18, 9.19, and 9.20 in their entirety and replacing Chapter 9.20 with a new chapter entitled “Urban Forestry”, to establish permit requirements and related regulations for pruning, removal, and planting of street trees, establish policies and procedures for discretionary review of requests to prune trees on public property, establish a heritage tree program, and provide for enforcement and penalties for violations; amending Title 1 of the Municipal Code, relating to Administration
ORD2892211/21/202312/5/2023An ordinance amending Titles 8 and 17 of the Municipal Code, relating to Animal Control and Public Safety, by amending Section 17.02.140, entitled “Public disturbance noise and public nuisance noise made by an animal”, and Section 8.12.060, entitled “Public disturbance noises”, to revise requirements for enforcement of an unlawful action and to remove the criminal misdemeanor charge for public disturbance and public nuisance noise made by an animal. [Council Member Hines]
ORD2892311/21/202312/5/2023An ordinance amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code, relating to Animal Control, by adding a new Section 17.02.155, entitled “Cat Declawing”, to establish a ban on performing a procedure that results in the partial or complete declawing of a cat except when conducted by a licensed veterinarian for a therapeutic purpose, effective March 31, 2024. [Council Member Hines]
ORD2892811/28/202312/19/2023An ordinance amending Subtitle 6B of the Municipal Code, relating to the License Code, by amending Section 6B.10.030, entitled “License definitions”, and Section 6B.10.190, entitled “Investigations and background checks”, to meet Federal Bureau of Investigation requirements to allow the City to conduct nationwide background checks for certain license applicants. [Danielle Larson, Tax and License Division Manager; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2892911/28/202312/19/2023An ordinance amending Subtitle 6A of the Municipal Code, relating to the Tax Code, by amending Section 6A.30.065, entitled “Job credits”, to narrow the definition of a green job and increase the value of the green job tax credit from $250 to $1,000 per year; and amending various sections throughout Chapter 6A.30, to update language, address areas of inconsistency, and comply with state law. [Danielle Larson, Tax and License Division Manager; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2892711/28/202312/19/2023An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 28910, relating to the Tax and License Code, to include an additional exhibit amending Municipal Code Chapter 6B.10 and 6B.20, effective November 13, 2023. [Danielle Larson, Tax and License Division Manager; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]
ORD2893012/6/202312/19/2023An ordinance amending Chapter 6A.30 of the Municipal Code, relating to Business and Occupation Tax, by adding a new Section 6A.30.067, entitled “Job Credit – Work Opportunity”, to provide a new $1,000 job tax credit for employers adding a new position and filling the position with an individual with a disability, as identified through the vocational referral in the federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit. [Council Member Blocker]

Time to Retire the Tacoma Aroma

Photo: Google

For the better part of a century, the Tacoma Aroma has been an embarrassing stigma on our city. While sources of the infamous reek have been many, one of the worst offenders has been rendering plants. These contribute the “rotting animal carcass” element to our distinctive perfume. 

Now, Tacoma’s last remaining rendering plant, operated by large multinational corporation Darling Ingredients, Inc, wants to extend their lease with the Port so they can restart their stinky business after it caught fire in 2022.

City and Port leaders, this is your moment! The universe has handed you a career-defining opportunity of a lifetime on a silver platter: the ability to redefine Tacoma as a vibrant, first-class metropolitan center. 

Say it with us city leadership, “Tacoma residents have suffered long enough! No More Tacoma Aroma!”

To rid our city of rendering plants, here’s what needs to happen:
–  Port of Tacoma Commissioners should decline a lease extension with Darling Ingredients Inc.
– Tacoma City Council should place an immediate moratorium on rendering plants.
– The Tacoma Planning Commission should support a Land Use Code Amendment filed by the Eastside Neighborhood Advisory Council to prohibit rendering plants from operating anywhere in the city.

Time is of the essence, as lease negotiations between the Port of Tacoma and Darling are expected to wrap up in the coming months. Since leases typically span decades, our elected leaders must take action now to save future generations from having to deal with a putrid-smelling city.

Arguably, the Tacoma Aroma has negatively impacted the quality of Tacoma’s neighborhoods and commerce. Property values and employment opportunities have lagged behind other Puget Sound cities. We have been unable to retain a single large private employer. The last one, Russell Investments, left town 15 years ago.

Tacoma needs to clean up its act if we want to attract jobs that pay a livable wage.

People want to live and work in a place that is visually attractive and doesn’t stink.

Fate of Historic Gault Middle School To Be Determined by City Council Committee Nov 8

The fate of Tacoma historic 1920s Gault Middle School will be decided Wednesday November 8th by the Tacoma City Council’s Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee. The briefing was only recently added. Public comment is due by Tuesday November 7th, the day after tomorrow.

There are presently very few significant City Landmarks within the McKinley/East Tacoma area, including:

  • McKinley Elementary School, 3702 McKinley Avenue
  • Fire Station #11, 3802 McKinley Avenue

McKinley Elementary and several other historic school buildings were added to the City’s Historic Register about 10 years ago. Gault was not added at the time due to objections by the Tacoma School District. (https://www.tacomadailyindex.com/blog/survey-could-help-preserve-tacomas-oldest-public-schools/1403527/)

There are three possible outcomes of Wednesday’s committee meeting:
1) Support the recommendation of the City’s Landmarks Commission and place Gault Middle School on the City’s Historic Register.
2) Pass the vote along for a vote by the full City Council.
1) Do nothing and demolition can proceed.

There are some complications though in that the current City Council likes to vote as a unified voice with no dissention and little public discussion. City Council Member Catherine Ushka represents the district which Gault is located in. Ushka has already stated she is for demolition of the historic school. This is most likely in response to a vocal minority that place blame on Gault for the ills of the neighborhood (crime, prostitution, etc). Meanwhile, other City Council Members have stated they will defer to Ushka and vote as she does. This has set in motion a tense situation in which Tacoma Public Schools is hoping plays out to their advantage in allowing them permission to tear down the historic Gault Middle School. At-Large Tacoma City Council Members which also represent the Eastside, Olgy Diaz and Kristina Walker, have not indicated whether they support saving the historic Gault Middle School or not.

But there are other issues at work. Demolition will be extremely costly. There will be much remediation needed as the property is extensive and nearly 100 years old. There are very few contractors available and their rates are at a premium. And what after demolition takes place then what? There are no concrete plans – and no budget in place – but the school district claims it intends to act as a developer and redevelop the site itself. This is something new as the school district has no experience doing this sort of work – and claims that its primary mission is educating youth. So, where does creating school owned neighborhood centers come in? We will have to wait and see.

City of Tacoma Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Agenda for November 8, 2023:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f0EozFTxsLBvjbZ2HXoQ8PC21I_iDxHH/view?usp=drive_link

Standing Committee Memorandum Full Background Notes: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fXnnO7M3_fTXmmQtLO6rEiiPqp_2m-wP/view?usp=drive_link

Community Meeting Set to Save Historic Gault Middle School from Demolition

Members of the “Save Eastside Tacoma’s Historic Gault School” group (https://www.facebook.com/SaveGault) are holding a community meeting open to the public on Saturday, Oct 14 at 1PM at the Moore Library (215 S 56th St). The goal of the meeting is to organize, advocate, and plan for the preservation and repurposing of the historic school as a community center. The meeting was prompted in response to the announcement made by Tacoma Public Schools declaring its intention to demolish the historic school. Located in Tacoma’s McKinley Neighborhood, Gault Middle School is part of a larger group of schools including Stewart and Hilltop Heritage (Jason Lee) that were built in the 1920s. Many of the schools in the group are on the city’s historic register. Gault, however, is not.

Where: Moore Library (215 S 56th St)
When:  Saturday, Oct 14 at 1PM
Why: To organize, advocate, and plan for the preservation and repurposing of Gault Middle School
Who: Open to the public

What Is The Tacoma City Council Been Up To?

In light of the recent talk of the Tacoma City Council getting pay raises, the Tacoma Sun thought it would be interesting to see exactly what the council has accomplished so far this year. The results will shock you!

At the time of this writing, 17 resolutions have been passed this year. All of the resolutions originated out of the Community and Economic Development department with most of the resolutions involving granting Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemptions.

Not one resolution originated from a council member.

The City Council has done a little better on creating ordinances. So far this year, two ordinances out of 42 were sponsored by city council members… although one of those ordinances was created in 2021.

What were the two ordinances?

ORD28799 (created 12-1-2021, passed 2-7-2023): “(Continued from the meeting of December 14, 2021) An ordinance amending, renaming, and renumbering Chapter 9.16 of the Municipal Code, relating to Streets and Sidewalks – Keeping Clean, by adding two new sections, to prevent obstruction and damage to sidewalks from the loading, unloading, and transport of goods; and amending the penalty provision to align with Tacoma’s Uniform Enforcement Code.” Sponsored by Council Member Ushka.

ORD28894 (passed 7-11-2023): “An ordinance amending Chapter 1.95 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Rental Housing Code, to require landlords to comply with health and safety laws; have a City business license before increasing rent or evicting tenants; set limits on late fees for rent and on pet deposits; require 120-day notice to raise rent; add new regulations for shared housing; and standardize screening criteria for the amount of tenant income required to qualify for housing, for reviewing a tenant’s criminal history, and acceptable identification.” Sponsored by Mayor Woodards.

Should we expect more results out of the council after this year’s 12% raise? What about after next year’s 20% raise?

Tacoma still has serious crime and safety issues – and possibly gang issues. Our neighborhoods are still under constant threat of encroachment from incompatible land use codes that haven’t been revised in decades. A proposed 2.4 million square foot warehouse off South Tacoma Way is one example. It is also still perfectly legal for any number of rendering plants and pulp mills to open up within the city limits. Tacoma still lags behind other large Northwest cities in terms of tree canopy. Tree canopies are critical in reducing pollution in the air and ground while also helping to reduce urban heat islands.

Clearly, there is much work still to do.

Data source: https://cityoftacoma.legistar.com/Legislation.aspx

2023 City Council Candidates Answer Hard Hitting Tacoma Sun Questions – Round One

Recently, the Tacoma Sun sent a questionnaire to all of the candidates that filed to run in the 2023 City Council elections. The first round of questions focuses on Tacoma’s biggest issues. Here, we present the responses received so far. We’ll do updates as responses come in.

UPDATE: added John Hines’ responses 7/25/2023

Todd Briske, Tacoma City Council candidate for At-Large Position 8:
Tacoma Sun: What will you do to reduce the impact of encampments on residents and small businesses?
I agreed with the decision of the council to create a 10-block camping ban around existing homeless shelters.  To be in accordance with the 9th Circuit Martin v. Boise decision, I want to make sure that we have enough emergency shelter beds to place everybody currently living on the street.  As long as these shelters are distributed around the city, that should give us the ability to ensure that nobody is left to live on the street.

Tacoma Sun: The Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma – even if they are arrested in remote areas of the county or in some cases from outside of the county. This has resulted in a highly disproportionate number of felons being released in downtown Tacoma. What specific steps would you take to reduce the number of felons being released in Tacoma? Would you support a plan which transports jail releases to the places where they live?
That does seem problematic.  It is not an issue I have looked into, so I would have to see a few possible solutions and their possible impacts, but the current situation does not seem fair. I would be willing to consider a transport solution.

Tacoma Sun: What do you propose be done to repair the small business community which was devastated during and after the Covid response?
It did aggravate me to see small businesses crushed and big businesses flourish because of the covid protocols.  Not being a business owner myself, I would have to learn from each of them what the biggest impediments are for each business.  I will always prioritize small local businesses.

Tacoma Sun: Do you support increasing Tacoma Police funding to add more officers to improve public safety?
My participation in the City of Tacoma Citizens’ Academy, seeing the understaffing and how thin the department is stretched, made me decide to run for this council position. I would use 911 call response time as a metric to decide how many patrol officers are required.  Our current average of 10 minutes for a priority 1 call is unacceptable.  Much in the same way I would use detective caseload as a metric to decide how many detectives we require.  If a homicide detective has to work 3+ cases at a time, those cases can’t get as much time as they might have otherwise.  We need to get back to making sure all stolen vehicle reports are taken in person, and not over the phone.  I will do everything in my power to make sure we fill our open positions and create new ones until we attain these goals.

Chris Van Vechten, Tacoma City Council candidate for District 3, Position 3
Tacoma Sun: What will you do to reduce the impact of encampments on residents and small businesses?
As a public defender and small business owner, I believe the best way to reduce the impact of encampments on Tacoma is to get people out of tents and into stable housing and into hope through public-private partnerships that blend innovation with pragmatism.  We require systems that provide opportunity for all and accountability from all for this to succeed.  The past hands-off policy of expecting people in this situation to get housed when they want, where they want, under whatever conditions they want, has not worked and has had a devastating impact on our community as well as the people living in those camps.  This is despite unprecedented investment in the issue.  Everyone I meet at the door says the same thing “I want the City to do something about this that is humane and effective.”  And I just respond: “if it’s not effective, it can’t be called humane.”  So doing what works is our first priority and then fully funding the solution.

The City Council not only has the legal authority but also a civic responsibility to regulate the public’s conduct in public spaces to ensure the public health and safety of everyone who calls Tacoma home.  Boise v Martin is a criminal law case, and as a criminal defense attorney I assure you it does not declare that people have a right to claim and adversely possess public property if they are unhoused.  Furthermore, telling someone they can’t camp somewhere is not “criminalizing homelessness.”  In more than 13 years practicing criminal law, I have never prosecuted nor defended anyone just for pitching a tent on public property.  It is certainly true that homeless populations are disproportionately targeted by police, often unfairly, but that is a separate issue.

Funding an empathetic response to homelessness cannot be achieved without the support of tax systems which are compromised by unregulated encampments.  Too many people no longer feel safe shopping local, and hat is a major problem.

As to what to do to reduce homelessness, I’m entirely non-partisan. 

  1. I support both sober and barrier free housing. 
  2. I support the social housing model, and also creating incentives to encourage private landlords to take risks on tenants who are difficult to place – like those people I represent in court who may have a home but aren’t allowed to go home because home is where the crime occurred.
  3. I support big projects like Pierce County Village, and I also support subsidies to keep low-income Tacomans housed.  I even like Tacoma’s GRIT program (originally called the UBI pilot program…though of course it isn’t really UBI). 
  4. I believe we need to work regionally to get people housed, to improve and share data on our unhoused populations, and we need to audit the claims of those living in tents to determine what is really going on in their lives rather than relying on self-reported narratives that may not really address the underlying issue.  My job as a criminal defense attorney is to challenge the established narrative, and doing so requires I vet both the State’s case and sometimes also my client’s claims.  It’s only then that I can serve them. 
  5. We need better and more accessible treatment programs, and we need to expect treatment providers to do this work in person and not on Zoom like some have over the past few years.  My clients are people, not pixels.  Helping them out of this is extremely difficult under any circumstances, and I believe impossible from behind a screen, if my clients can maintain cellphone stability to begin with.

Tacoma Sun: The Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma – even if they are arrested in remote areas of the county or in some cases from outside of the county. This has resulted in a highly disproportionate number of felons being released in downtown Tacoma. What specific steps would you take to reduce the number of felons being released in Tacoma? Would you support a plan which transports jail releases to the places where they live?
For various reasons, this is actually less of an issue than it used to be. 

But imagine you are arrested. The police search your pockets incident to arrest and take your keys, wallet, cellphone and everything and anything else before transporting you to jail where they finally take your clothes and put you in a jail uniform. You subsequently are charged with a crime and sometimes bail is imposed depending on a myriad of factors.

But in most cases you’ll be released at arraignment these days.  The police may be holding your cellphone in evidence but allow you the opportunity to make a call for a ride using one of their phones.  The problem with this is that, in 2023, most people don’t have many phone numbers memorized.  

Now some police officers will allow you prior to transporting you into custody to search your cellphone and write down some numbers on your arms in sharpie to make calls when you get to jail. Some do this because they are nice officers, others do it because they want to search your phone history with you for evidence of additional crimes, which makes this a dangerous gambit.

Once in custody, however, getting a phone number off your cell is damn near impossible.  For starters, they may not have a charger for it at the jail, which means it may be dead by the time you get there. Second, officers can’t open a phone without your permission or a warrant because that constitutes an unconstitutional search. Third, officers are in the habit of holding cellphones indefinitely on the pretext of preserving it as evidence and if you access the phone after it was taken in evidence, there is the potential for contamination and other miscellaneous evidentiary concerns. And although theoretically officers would likely find substantial evidence on cellphones – particularly in the domestic violence or drug context – in practice, they very rarely actually take the time to investigate by procuring search warrants. Instead, they merely hold the phone indefinitely and I suspect eventually sell them to someone. Sometimes after a case resolves, my client’s get the phone back, but often times not. In one case the police held my client’s phone for 7 months before the prosecutor even bothered to file charges.

So I think so long as this is an issue – and it remains one, though again, less than it use to be, it does make sense to contract with Uber or other ride share organizations to ensure people get home if they’re not able to call in a ride.  But it would take the County Council rather than the City to lead the charge on that.

Tacoma Sun: What do you propose be done to repair the small business community which was devastated during and after the Covid response?
So I’ve been a Tacoma business owner for 9 years now.  I’m not sure how I survived the last 3, but I did.

I think it makes sense to look at our B&O tax and ask ourselves if it makes sense to raise the threshold on gross revenue.  We’ve been at $250k for the past 11 or 13 years and our business community has had to weather incredible challenges since then – including record inflation.  I also think it makes sense to have different thresholds for collection for different businesses districts. 

For example, back in April, an employee of Ice Cream Social told me the Proctor location is making $4 for every $1 the Hilltop location is because of prolonged delays tied to Link extension and issues of safety in the neighborhood.  It’s probably a lot easier to gross $250k in Proctor than it is in Hilltop, but the B&O tax doesn’t seem to consider that nor to recognize the incredible risk business owners take when they invest in neighborhoods like mine.  It also fails to consider the racial dynamics of who is a business owner on MLK vs Proctor and I want to support BIPOC businesses owners whilst still abiding by SCOTUS’ interpretation of the 14th amendment.

I want to encourage businesses to take a chance on Tacoma so in neighborhoods that score low on equity index the threshold for paying into B&O should maybe be higher than in places like Proctor.  For example, if your business in Proctor grosses $250k or more you’re subject to B&O taxation, but if your business is in Hilltop it would be say $300k and say $350K in Madrona, etc.  With rising costs and inflation, this isn’t a horrible idea, and there’s precedent in the 21st century for Tacoma doing this.

We have a lot of vacant commercial real estate across Tacoma while the cost of rent inexplicably goes up.  My office building on 9th and Yakima was full before 2020, now it’s 2/3rds empty.  I consider that a serious problem and I have experience via my 2014 service with the TCRA working with various organizations to provide incentives and assistance with businesses that want to work in Tacoma

I think Tacoma has a livability problem – always has but is now more extreme than we are used to – and I believe by making Tacoma more livable businesses owners will thrive.

Finally, government needs to tell people to get outside their houses again.  After years of telling people to “stay home and stay safe” too many people in my district do all their shopping now online out of fear of leaving their home.  They don’t go to parks for fear of the homeless, they don’t go to an office, and they don’t even go to grocery stores anymore. 

I don’t know how to rebuild real community from behind a computer screen.  It’s not healthy for the individual or our community to be so isolated.  The more the public accesses public spaces and businesses, the more you’re going to see a reduction in things like crime. 

The government helped create this isolationist mentality, it has to play a role in ending it by encouraging people to get out of their house, go for walks, and patronize out local businesses. 

One thing that always amazed me is that during the first years of Obama’s presidency, childhood obesity went into decline.  This was despite funding cuts to PE and recess during the Great Recession.  The credit belongs to Michele Obama, who made childhood fitness and eating right her platform while first lady.  She helped spur an explosion of community gardens among other things by simply being a voice for changing our behavior.  Sometimes its something as simple as encouraging simple alterations in our behavior that can make a measurable impacts in our community.

Question: Do you support increasing Tacoma Police funding to add more officers to improve public safety?
When I moved to Tacoma, there were 400 officers on TPD’s staff.  There were 190,000 people in this town at the time.  Last time I checked, there are only 340 officers now despite more than 220,000 people.  We need more officers for our growing city, but the shortages have less to do with funding issues than other things.  My wife is in healthcare and they have severe shortages of staff too post pandemic even though nurses and doctors were called heroes during the pandemic (even though they weren’t always treated like it.)  Many other essential fields are struggling for staff too.  These are tough jobs that many people are avoiding right now out of a desire to pursue a greater work life balance, etc. 

It’s no secret that I have been calling for justice reforms for years and working with area leaders to make that happen, but what happened in 2020 was beyond anything I ever suggested.  The Tacoma of 2019 was over policed and under accountable.  I don’t want to go back to that world.  But I also don’t want to be stuck in 2020 forever.  There has been an overcorrection and a more centrist position is required.  We need more police and corrections officer staff to bring us to the center and we also require more jail and prison reforms to move us away from punishment toward restoration and rehabilitation.  But it’s unclear to me that a lack of funding is what is driving these shortages right now. 

Kristen Wynne, Tacoma City Council At-Large Position 7:
Question: What will you do to reduce the impact of encampments on residents and small businesses?
There are an unacceptable number of people experiencing homelessness in Tacoma. Sadly, too many of them are living in unsanctioned encampments which are dangerous, unsanitary and unhealthy for both those living in them and for the community nearby. Tacoma must prioritize getting folks off the street and into shelter with access to services.

Last year, the city enacted a 10-block buffer ordinance that, according to the city, is leading to larger numbers of people accepting shelter and services. That is movement in the right direction. However, there are issues with the ordinance as written.

First, it must be amended to include RVs and cars which are often found in unsanctioned encampments and pose all the same issues that tents do. Additionally, the ordinance must include our K-12 schools and related bus stops as places protected by the buffer area.
Second, the city must also address the fact that after they’ve cleared an area, the encampment often returns within a short period of time. The city must take steps to prevent this from happening such as site hardening, posting no parking signs, and other similar measures.
Third, unsanctioned encampments must not be allowed to be the site of illegal activity. The city must enforce and prosecute all laws on our books, including those related to the possession and use of illegal drugs in public.

Finally, we cannot allow trash to accumulate for basic health reasons. If we as a city allow people to live on the streets, then we are responsible for cleaning up all waste generated from those sites promptly. We must better manage the trash and feces associated with people living on the street.

Question: The Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma – even if they are arrested in remote areas of the county or in some cases from outside of the county. This has resulted in a highly disproportionate number of felons being released in downtown Tacoma. What specific steps would you take to reduce the number of felons being released in Tacoma? Would you support a plan which transports jail releases to the places where they live?
Like so many in Tacoma, I am concerned about the high level of crime we are experiencing. I am running for Tacoma City Council to help improve public safety. I am aware that too often inmates are released without a way to arrange transportation home. I have also been told that the area is a hot spot for car theft. If elected I would investigate the details of this situation to fully understand the issues and, at a minimum, would support providing inmates with a free pass for public transportation so that they can return home. This would be good for both the inmates and the community.

Question: What do you propose be done to repair the small business community which was devastated during and after the Covid response?
COVID-19 was a very difficult time for so many in Tacoma. If elected, I will find out if any federal covid funds remain available for businesses who haven’t recovered from the impact of the pandemic.

I also believe Tacoma must be more business-friendly to help all businesses here. To accomplish that, city leadership must solicit input from businesses on issues that impact them and must be responsive when businesses reach out with concerns, including the impact of property crime. Further, the city must make decisions in a measured and predictable manner so that businesses can plan for city-imposed changes. The dramatic increase in business license fees imposed last year without significant input from the business community and with very little advance notice was not acceptable. It left many feeling that Tacoma does not value its business community or understand the challenges of running a small business.

Question: Do you support increasing Tacoma Police funding to add more officers to improve public safety?
Without question, we must find a way to increase the number of officers on our police force. I support additional funding to ensure that we have the staffing levels and resources needed to keep our city safe. At the present time, the city has budgeted for 36 officers at the Police Department but has not yet filled those spots. We must make filling those empty positions a top priority. I also support further analysis to determine whether, when those positions are filled, we have the correct number of officers for a city of our size and character. I am committed to public safety and am proud to be the candidate for Position 7 who is endorsed by the Police Union, Local 6.

John Hines, Tacoma City Council candidate for District 1, Position 1

Question: The Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma – even if they are arrested in remote areas of the county or in some cases from outside of the county. This has resulted in a highly disproportionate number of felons being released in downtown Tacoma. What specific steps would you take to reduce the number of felons being released in Tacoma? Would you support a plan which transports jail releases to the places where they live? 

Releasing people not from Tacoma into the downtown, away from their potential connections and family members, can cut them off from the support needed to ensure that they can transition back into life. There may be some situations where for safety reasons they may not be able to return to their previous residence, but in that case, we can help them find services and resources, and ensure they are connected back in their community.  

I would begin by working with our partners at Pierce County to identify ways to coordinate the release of people from Pierce County Jail. This should include resources, medical and mental health resources, housing, and transportation back to their previous community, or as close as possible. We can take the step to move beyond simply releasing people and towards getting them closer to home, and serve both the individual and our city better.  

Question: What do you propose be done to repair the small business community which was devastated during and after the Covid response? 

I have always been proud of our small businesses and their contribution to making our city the unique and interesting place that it is. The COVID pandemic led to the loss of too many of our small businesses, so it is critical to find ways to make sure those that survived can grow and thrive.  

First, the city can support small businesses would be to continue to streamline bureaucratic processes and reduce regulatory burdens to make it easier for small businesses to navigate licensing, permits, and other administrative tasks. This is a time to be innovative and embrace new ideas as businesses are working to bounce back.  

Second, the primary responsibility of our city government is making our community safe. We can continue to invest in community safety and making our business districts more welcoming and inviting. I think this will take many forms, from adding police officers, to adding Community Liaison Officers and Community Services Officers to work with businesses, and by removing graffiti and trash. We need to make sure we have a safe environment for businesses to operate and for their employees and customers to visit.    

Third, the city has provided funding for broken windows and security in our business districts, and I would like to see those programs continue as needed. At the same time, as we invest in community safety and hopefully see fewer broken windows, I would like to expand and look more closely at providing further financial assistance and grants to small businesses. Of particular interest to me is helping small businesses find street level retail space, both helping businesses find customers and reactivating some of our vacant storefronts.  

Finally, we need to focus on bringing people back downtown and back into our business districts. Working to activate our streets with streateries, supporting local events that bring in customers to businesses, working with business districts to attract more foot traffic to small businesses are areas where the city and businesses can work together.  

I think if we work on these four areas, and in other areas in collaboration with businesses, we can make Tacoma a place for businesses to grow and thrive post pandemic. 

Question: Do you support increasing Tacoma Police funding to add more officers to improve public safety? 

The primary responsibility of our city government is making our community safe. Healthy neighborhoods, active business districts, and welcoming public spaces require safety and security. 

To achieve this, a critical component is a fully staffed and supported police department.  Since I have been on the council, we have continued to try and find ways to invest to improve safety and staff our police department. This has included hiring and retention bonuses to bring in new officers and to keep the ones that we already have. We have slowly reduced the number of open positions, but I am committed to continuing to do the work to fill them all. 

While the police department is not the only part of the safety puzzle in our city, they are a very large piece and one that needs adequate people in resources to meet the demands of our community.  

Disclosure: Candidate responses are posted as received. Candidate Chris Van Vechten has been personal friends of two Tacoma Sun editorial board members for over 10 years.

Tacoma Named One of Nation’s Worst Run Cities – Again

For the second year in a row, Tacoma was named one of the worst run cities in the country. The report by WalletHub compares budgets and quality of services offered by 149 US cities. Ranking just behind Detroit and only slightly better than Flint, Michigan, Tacoma ranked 141 on the list.

From WalletHub “The past year has been a true test of the effectiveness of local leadership. City leaders have had to deal with economic difficulties like high inflation in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other issues like elevated homicide rates.

Even during less difficult times, running a city is a tall order. The larger the city, the more complex it becomes to manage. In addition to representing the residents, local leaders must balance the public’s diverse interests with the city’s limited resources. That often means not everyone’s needs can or will be met. Leaders must carefully consider which services are most essential, which agencies’ budgets to cut or boost, and whether and how much to raise taxes, among other decisions.

But how do we measure the effectiveness of local leadership? One way is by determining a city’s operating efficiency. In other words, we can learn how well city officials manage and spend public funds by comparing the quality of services residents receive against the city’s total budget.

Using that approach, WalletHub compared the operating efficiency of 149 of the largest U.S. cities to reveal which among them are managed best. We constructed a ‘Quality of Services’ score made up of 36 metrics grouped into six service categories, which we then measured against the city’s per-capita budget.

In order to determine the best- and worst-run cities in America, WalletHub compared 149 of the most populated cities across six key categories: 1) Financial Stability, 2) Education, 3) Health, 4) Safety, 5) Economy and 6) Infrastructure & Pollution.

We evaluated those dimensions using 36 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the highest quality of service.

Next, we calculated an overall ‘Quality of City Services’ score for each city based on its weighted average across all the metrics. Finally, for each city, we divided the ‘Quality of City Services’ score by the ‘Total Budget per Capita’ (dollar amount) in order to construct a ‘Score per Dollar Spent’ index — displayed as ‘Overall Rank’ in the Main Findings table above — which we then used to rank-order the cities in our sample.”

Link to WalletHub report.

Tacoma City Council Meeting Agenda for June 27, 2023

City of Tacoma
City Council Agenda
747 Market Street, Tacoma, WA 98402, Council Chambers
Dial: 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 848 3423 3126
Webinar Link: http://www.zoom.us/j/84834233126 Passcode: 349099
June 27, 2023
5:00 PM

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS:
RES41228 – A resolution awarding a contract to Asphalt Patch Systems, Inc., in the amount of $460,860, plus applicable taxes, plus a 15 percent contingency, for a cumulative total of $529,989, budgeted from the Transportation Capital Fund, for replacement of unfit or unsafe sidewalks at various locations within the Eastside Neighborhood Council District – Specification No. PW23-0054F.
[Sandra Guffey, Engineering Technician IV; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE,
Interim Director, Public Works]

PURCHASE RESOLUTIONS:
RES41228 – A resolution awarding a contract to Asphalt Patch Systems, Inc., in the amount of $460,860, plus applicable taxes, plus a 15 percent contingency, for a cumulative total of $529,989, budgeted from the Transportation Capital Fund, for replacement of unfit or unsafe sidewalks at various locations within the Eastside Neighborhood Council District – Specification No. PW23-0054F.
[Sandra Guffey, Engineering Technician IV; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE,
Interim Director, Public Works]

PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS:
23-0676 Proclaiming July 2023 as Pride Month.
23-0681 Recognizing Doris Sorum.

REGULAR AGENDA

23-0671 – A motion may be considered to confirm the emergency proclamation, related to the
damage at the Union Avenue to South Tacoma Way ramp, signed by the City Manager
and the Mayor, retroactive to February 27, 2023.

APPOINTMENTS:
RES41229 – A resolution appointing Kashmiri Gavronski to the Board of Ethics.
[Doris Sorum, City Clerk; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]

PURCHASE RESOLUTIONS:
RES41230 – A resolution awarding a contract to Global Contractors, LLC, in the amount of $2,999,526.00, plus applicable taxes, plus a 15 percent contingency, budgeted from the Transportation Capital Fund, for sidewalk and streetscape improvements from Earnest South Brazill Street to 6th Avenue along Martin Luther King Jr. Way, for a projected contract total of $3,449,454.90 – Specification No. PW23-0021F.
[Jon Kulju, Project Manager; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE, Interim Director,
Public Works]

RESOLUTIONS:
RES41231 – A resolution authorizing the execution of an amendment to the interest-free loan agreement numbered RRB-1269 with Washington State Department of Transportation, to extend the completion date of certain railroad improvement projects from June 30, 2023, to December 31, 2023.
[Kyle Kellem, Roadmaster; Dale King, Rail Superintendent]

RES41232 – A resolution authorizing the execution of an amendment to the Tacoma Link Joint Operating Agreement with Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority d.b.a. Sound Transit, to revise and add certain mutually agreed terms and conditions.
[Stephanie Brock, Engineering Manager; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE, Interim Director,
Public Works]

RES41233 – A resolution authorizing the execution of an agreement with Pierce County, in an amount not to exceed $9,600,000, budgeted from the General Fund, for jail services, through
December 31, 2028.
[Chris Bacha, Chief Deputy City Attorney; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney; Andy Cherullo,
Director, Finance]

FINAL READING OF ORDINANCES:
ORD28888 – An ordinance amending the non-exclusive 20-year franchise agreement with Rainier Connect North LLC, to transfer the agreement to Alphaboost Purchaser, LLC, to construct, operate, maintain, and provide cable television services in the City.
[Jeff Lueders, Division Manager; Amy Clancy, Director,
Media and Communications Office]

ORD28892 – An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement rates of pay and compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Court Clerks Unit.
[Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]

ORD28893 – An ordinance adopting the Six-Year Comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program amended for the years 2023 and 2024-2029.
[Jennifer Kammerzell, Assistant Division Manager; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE,
Interim Director, Public Works]

ORD28894 – An ordinance amending Chapter 1.95 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Rental Housing Code, to require landlords to comply with health and safety laws; have a City business license before increasing rent or evicting tenants; set limits on late fees for rent and on pet deposits; require 120-day notice to raise rent; add new regulations for shared housing; and standardize screening criteria for the amount of tenant income required to qualify for housing, for reviewing a tenant’s criminal history, and acceptable identification.
[Mayor Woodards]

PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPEALS:
23-0609 – This is the date set for a public hearing by the City Council on the 2023 Annual Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulatory Code, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
[Stephen Atkinson, Principal Planner; Peter Huffman, Director,
Planning and Development Services]

Link to Tacoma City Council agendas: https://cityoftacoma.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=22566&GUID=F23EE68E-8E57-4BEC-8601-B969C461E3B3&R=5c7ecd45-e032-4b58-8f7a-b3609989a2d2

City of Tacoma City Council Agenda for June 13, 2023

The Tacoma City Council will hold a Study Session on June 13 at 5:00PM.
Webinar Link: http://www.zoom.us/j/84834233126 Passcode: 349099

CONSENT AGENDA

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS:

RES41209 – A resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Agreement with the State of Washington and various Pierce County towns and cities, for the creation of a regional Opioid Abatement Council, as required by Opioid Settlements.
[Jacques Colon, Chief Strategy Officer, Office of Strategy; Elizabeth Pauli, City Manager]

PURCHASE RESOLUTIONS:

RES41210 – A resolution awarding a contract to PumpTech, LLC, in the amount of $587,110,
plus applicable taxes, budgeted from the Wastewater Fund, for the procurement of Vaughan Chopper Pumps at the South Tacoma Pump Station – Sole Source.
[Lance Bunch, P.E., Project Manager; Michael P. Slevin III, P.E., Director, Environmental Services]

RES41211 – A resolution awarding a contract to Scarsella Bros. Inc., in the amount of $469,630, plus applicable taxes, plus a 20 percent contingency, budgeted from the Surface Water Fund, to repair erosion of two shoreline areas adjacent to the St. Paul Confined Disposal Facility, for a projected contract total of $563,556 – Specification No. ES22-0371F.
[Jody Bratton, Project Manager; Michael P. Slevin III, Director, Environmental Services]

RES41212 – A resolution authorizing an increase and extending the contract with Republic Parking Northwest, LLC d.b.a. Reef Parking, in the amount of $200,000, plus applicable taxes, for a cumulative total of $1,407,360, budgeted from the Tacoma Dome Fund, for professional parking services for the Tacoma Dome, through June 30, 2024 – Specification No. PF16-0327F. [John McClees, Assistant Director; Adam Cook, Director, Tacoma Venues and Events]

REGULAR AGENDA

RESOLUTIONS:

RES41214 – A resolution authorizing the execution of a Letter of Agreement with the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Tacoma Power Unit, regarding the classification of Fire Maintenance Electrician. [Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]

RES41215 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $7,000, to sponsor the Summer Coding Workshop Series.
[Council Member Daniels]

RES41216 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $20,000, to support efforts to mitigate the impact of the City’s light rail investment for the Hilltop Street Fair and Stadium Business District events.
[Council Member Blocker]

RES41217 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $2,500, to sponsor the 2023 Juneteenth Celebration.
[Mayor Woodards]

FINAL READING OF ORDINANCES:

ORD28886 – An ordinance declaring the public necessity for, and providing for the acquisition
by eminent domain of certain properties located between McKinley Avenue and
Portland Avenue, to construct the pedestrian, signal safety, and road improvements
in connection with the East 64th Street, Phase 2 Improvement Project.
[Troy Stevens, Senior Real Estate Specialist; Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE,
Interim Director, Public Works]

ORD28887 – An ordinance amending Title 8 of the Municipal Code, relating to Public Safety, by adding a new Chapter 8.190, entitled “Drug Crimes”, and repealing in its entirety Chapter 8.29, entitled “Drug Paraphernalia”, to comply with state law.
[Keith Echterling, Deputy City Attorney; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]

ORD28889 – An ordinance amending Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code, relating to the Compensation Plan, to implement compensation for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 483, Tacoma Power Unit.
[Dylan Carlson, Labor Relations Division Manager; Bill Fosbre, City Attorney]

ORD28890 – An ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of one or more series of limited tax general obligation refunding bonds, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $32,000,000, to defease and refund certain outstanding general obligation bonds of the City and to pay costs of issuing the bonds; providing the form of the bonds; and delegating the authority to approve the final terms of the bonds.
[Michael San Soucie, City Treasurer; Andy Cherullo, Director, Finance]

ORD28891 – An ordinance amending Amended Ordinance No. 26749, which granted the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority d.b.a. Sound Transit, a non-exclusive Right of Use Agreement, by adding Exhibits “E” and “F” to establish rights, duties, and responsibilities related to maintenance, repair, or replacement of a portion of a 24-inch stormwater main located under
the Link Light Rail Expansion Project Overhead Contact System within Stadium Way.
[Corey Newton, P.E., Division Manager, Planning and Development Services;
Josh Diekmann, P.E. PTOE, Interim Director, Public Works]

Link to City Council agendas: https://cityoftacoma.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=22566&GUID=F23EE68E-8E57-4BEC-8601-B969C461E3B3&R=5c7ecd45-e032-4b58-8f7a-b3609989a2d2

Update on Tacoma’s “TB Mary” Case

A Tacoma resident refusing to get treated for tuberculosis (TB) for since late last year has been booked into the Pierce County jail. People can die from TB if they don’t get treatment. And they can expose other people to unnecessary risk of getting TB. TB is deadly and contagious but curable with medication.

Earlier this year, after promising to take her medication or voluntarily isolate herself, she was seen hopping aboard a public bus which she took to the casino. On Friday, Feb. 24, the Tacoma/Pierce County Health Department went to court for the 16th time to get her to comply. This is the third time in 20 years the Health Department has had to seek a court order to detain a potentially contagious patient who refused treatment for TB.

On June 1, law enforcement transported the patient to the Pierce County Jail where she will be housed in a room specially equipped for isolation, testing and treatment. The Health Department gave thanks to the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department and the deputies who supported public health with this necessary intervention.

Tacoma Candidates File for 2023 Primary Election

The 2023 election campaign season kicked off with last week’s filing deadline. This is an “off” year but it looks to be an interesting one for a few races! Here are the official filings for the primary election to be held August 1st.

City of Tacoma, Council at Large Pos. 7:
– Olgy Diaz
– Kristen Wynne

City of Tacoma, Council at Large Pos. 8:
– Kristina Walker
– Todd Briske
– Hunter Henderson

City of Tacoma, Council Dist. 1:
– John Hines

City of Tacoma, Council Dist. 3:
– Malando Redeemer
– Jamika Scott
– Chris Van Vechten
– Sheldon Greyell
– John Frazier

Port of Tacoma, Commissioner Pos. 3:
– Deanna Keller
– Jeannette Twitty

Port of Tacoma, Commissioner Pos. 5:
– Kristin Ang
– Dave Bryant

Tacoma School District No. 10, Director Pos. 3:
– Korey Strozier

Tacoma School District No. 10, Director Pos. 5:
– Elizabeth Bonbright
– Brian’na Wolk

Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma, Commissioner Pos. 4:
– Andrea Smith

Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma, Commissioner Pos. 5:
– Tony Anderson
– Matt Mauer

Landmark Tacoma Municipal Building Set for Apartment Conversion

(Tacoma, WA) By a vote of 9-0, the Tacoma City Council voted on Tuesday to convert its Art Deco Municipal Building into apartments. Finished in 1931, the 17 story building was originally known as the Rhodes Medical Arts Tower but has been used by the City of Tacoma for government administration since the 1970s. The office to apartment conversion will yield 177 units with 50% set aside for affordable housing. “With a majority of our staff now working remotely, it makes the most sense for the city to turn over the building to a higher and better purpose,” stated Tacoma City Manager Elizabeth Pauli. At 233 feet, the Municipal Building is among the tallest in Tacoma and is visible throughout downtown. Although the building has been through many renovations over the decades, the interior still retains many original fixtures including a showpiece Art Deco chandelier, a giant spiral brass entry stairwell, and a passenger elevator. “I won’t miss riding in that thing!” said Tacoma Mayor Victoria Woodards. The property is set to be transferred to the Tacoma Housing Authority which will oversee the conversion process. Permitting is expected to be complete by 2031 with move-in by 2035.

Coming Soon: New Bars, Restaurants, and Tasting Rooms

By: Morgan Alexander

Leavenworth-based non-profit winery, Water From Wine, is opening a tasting room at 1704 Pacific Ave in the UWT neighborhood of downtown Tacoma. https://www.waterfromwine.org/

Tim’s Kitchen is also coming to the UWT neighborhood. They will be taking over the old Harmon Brewery space at 1938 Pacific Ave. https://www.tims-kitchen.com/

At the other end of downtown, West 122 is opening a restaurant described as a “chef driven concept, focusing on classical and modern European dishes utilizing the finest Ingredients the PNW has to offer” at 728 Pacific Ave which formerly housed the world famous Tacoma Cabana tiki bar (RIP). https://west122.com/

Another Pacific Ave opening (are you seeing a theme?) is Amor Wine and Tapas at 750 Pacific Ave. They will be featuring a Mediterranean menu of small plates with a wine shop and bar. 

RUCA opened at 3511 E McKinley recently. Proctor residents may recognize some of the faces – and food – as they formerly ran the much loved La Fondita. https://www.facebook.com/Ruca3511

Tacoma Attorney Announces for City Council

“Van Vechten” is a Dutch name which literally means “ready to fight,” “to struggle,” or “to zealously advocate.”  As a criminal defense attorney, Tacoma City Council Candidate Chris Van Vechten has been a zealous advocate for more than 1100 clients who came from every cross-section of our community.  During what was often the worst point in their lives, Chris was there for everyone from professional athletes and politicians, to kids in foster care and people living in tents.  

Now Van Vechten is ready to fight for the people of District 3.  District 3 needs someone with the right blend of compassion and front line common sense to move the needle on perennial issues like crime, homelessness, access to affordable quality housing, and businesses development/survival in Tacoma. 

Chris Van Vechten moved to Tacoma from Portland in 2004 to attend the University of Puget Sound.  He majored in American history, volunteered in the community, and worked as a legislative staff member for Tacoma’s own State Representative Dennis Flannigan.

Chris subsequently purchased a home in Hilltop and went on to earn a law degree from Seattle University School of Law.  He owns and maintains his own law office on Hilltop as well. Prior to launching his practice, Chris worked as a Rule 9 prosecuting attorney with the Thurston County Prosecutor’s Office and later with the Lakewood City Attorney’s Office.  Early in his legal career, Chris did pro bono work for tenants facing eviction via the Pierce County Neighborhood Legal Clinic, and briefly volunteered with the Northwest Justice Project’s Mortgage Foreclosure Mediation program.  

Today Chris is a member of the Pierce County Superior Court’s Criminal Procedure Committee – which has spent the past several years trying to preserve the Sixth Amendment Rights of the accused and incarcerated in the midst of a global pandemic.  Previously he served on the Tacoma Community Redevelopment Authority; Mayor Marilyn Strickland’s Public Education Task Force; the Pierce County Arts Commission, and was co-chair of the 27th District Democrats Endorsement committee in 2017.   In 2009, The News Tribune credited Chris with leading a successful campaign to get Tacoma School Board meetings televised.

Chris is the father of a fierce first grader named Czarina who was born and raised on Hilltop; and the husband of the far more impressive Jen Van Vechten, who works in healthcare development and served on the front line during the first wave of the Covid 19 pandemic.

“I believe in solutions, not slogans.  And that is what I’ll provide the voters with as a candidate in this race.” 

Tacoma City Council Report Card for 2022

By: Morgan Alexander

The Number One topic for 2022 in Tacoma easily was CRIME. From a sky-rocketing homicide rate to a record number of vehicles stolen to retail businesses being broken into and robbed at gunpoint to illegal street racing, it felt like criminals were taking over the City.

It is with this in mind that we look at how the City Council responded. One way to analyze the activity of the City Council is to look at what it accomplished. In 2022, there were a total of 66 ordinances passed in the City of Tacoma with five of those brought forward by four Council Members and none by the Mayor. That works out to only 8% of the total ordinances passed. There were also 183 resolutions passed with only 31 being brought up by Council Members. For the purpose of this article, we are looking only at items brought forward by the City Council and Mayor.

What’s the difference between an ordinance and a resolution? An ordinance is a law. It can be either a new one or a modification of an existing one. A resolution covers actions by the City Council and Mayor that falls outside of creating or modifying a law, such as directing funds to special projects, declarations, and house cleaning minutiae.

In taking a look at the five ordinances passed, only one directly addressed a major concern residents had in 2022: illegal street racing (ordinance #28811; Rumbaugh). One other ordinance related to crime reduction was ordinance #28831 (Hines) which established “a ten-block buffer prohibiting camping and the storage of personal belongings on public property around temporary shelters.”

Total Resolutions sponsored by Council Members showed twice the activity when viewed as a percentage of total passed compared with ordinances. There were a total of 183 resolutions passed with 31 (17%) of them sponsored by Council Members. It’s not hard to figure out why though – it’s through resolutions that individual Council Members get to direct funding for pet projects or to use for community projects in their neighborhoods. The amounts, however, are fairly small in terms of the overall city budget.

The fact that only two laws out of the 66 passed addressed the biggest concern of the year leaves this writer with more questions than answers. Realistically, how much should the Council be expected to do? Are the solutions to crime beyond anything that can be done by creating or changing laws? But also, the City of Tacoma Council is part-time and has no dedicated staff. Would the Council be more productive if it were full-time and had its own staff? 

BY THE NUMBERS

Ordinances
Total ordinances passed: 66
Total by a council member: 5 (8% of total passed)
Blocker: 1
Hines: 1
Diaz: 2
Rumbaugh: 1

Resolutions 
Total resolutions passed: 183
Total by a council member: 31 (17% of total passed)
Blocker: 4
Bushnell: 0
Daniels: 2
Diaz: 2
Hines: 1
McCarthy: 1
Rumbaugh: 2
Ushka: 2
Walker: 3
Woodards: 14

Summary of Ordinances Sponsored by Council Members:
ORD28811 – An amended ordinance amending Chapter 11.05 of the Municipal Code, relating to Model Traffic Ordinance, by adding a new Section 11.05.133, entitled “Unlawful exhibition of speed attendance prohibited”, relating to prohibiting attendance at unlawful exhibitions of speed. [Council Member Rumbaugh]

ORD28831 – An amended Substitute Ordinance amending Title 8 of the Municipal Code, relating to Public Safety, by adding a new Chapter 8.19, entitled “Use of Public Property”, to establish a ten-block buffer prohibiting camping and the storage of personal belongings on public property around temporary shelters, effective October 31, 2022. [Council Member Hines]

ORD28859 – An ordinance amending various chapters in Title 1, relating to Administration and Personnel; Title 6, relating to the Tax and License Code; and Title 16, relating to Cable Systems, Open Video Systems, Telecommunications Systems and Private Communications Systems of the Municipal Code, for protection against discrimination based on an individual’s actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes. [Council Member Diaz]

ORD28858 – An ordinance amending Title 8 of the Municipal Code, relating to Public Safety, by adding a new Chapter 8.180, entitled “Interference with Health Care Facilities or Providers”, to ensure public health and safety for persons seeking health care services. [Council Member Diaz]

ORD28866 – An ordinance amending various sections in Title 1 of the Municipal Code, relating to Administration and Personnel, to codify the Office of Equity and Human Rights as an office; and adding transformation of the City into an anti-racist institution to the official duties of the City Manager. [Council Member Blocker]

Summary of Resolutions Sponsored by Council Members:
RES40919 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $31,000, to support the full or partial costs to five or more City-based small businesses or non-profits hosting a Seed Internship. [Council Member Walker]

RES40920 – A resolution expressing support for Tacoma’s Sister City in Brovary, and all of Ukraine, and joining our brothers and sisters in Ukraine in calling for peace and an end to this conflict in their country. [Mayor Woodards]

RES40925 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $20,000, for expenses related to traffic control devices and services for the 2022 Daffodil Parade. [Mayor Woodards]

RES40934 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $10,000, for expenditures related to the 2022 Tacoma Reads Together programming and events. [Mayor Woodards]

RES40940 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $2,500, to fund litter pick-up tools for the annual volunteer-led Litter Free 253 event. [Council Member Hines]

RES40941 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $25,000, to assist the Tacoma Refugee Choir in funding the music video portion of their 2022 spring projects. [Deputy Mayor Ushka]

RES40948  – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $12,000, to fund grants that support community engagement programs sponsored through South Sound Together. [Council Member Blocker]

RES40967 – A resolution transitioning the Tacoma Permit Advisory Task Force to the Tacoma Permit Advisory Group. [Council Member McCarthy]

RES40975 – A resolution affirming the City’s commitment to ensuring all residents have a safe and affordable place to live by joining House America. [Mayor Woodards]

RES40981 – A resolution ratifying the Annual Performance Review of the City Manager, and authorizing the execution of an amendment to the employment compensation agreement with Elizabeth Pauli to serve as City Manager, retroactive to May 16, 2022. [Mayor Woodards]

RES40995 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $35,000, to fund the partial costs to develop and implement an eight-week Safe Youth Awareness Campaign beginning in July 2022. [Council Member Daniels]

RES40994 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $2,500, to fund three LGBTQIA+ Pride painting projects, including temporary rainbow crosswalks, permanent rainbow bricks, and temporary rainbow barriers. [Council Member Walker]

RES41000 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $6,500, to sponsor the Mayors Innovation Project summer conference in Tacoma. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41004 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $10,000, for the purpose of partially funding renovations to the Korean American Association of Tacoma building, located at 8645 Pacific Avenue. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41015 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $2,500, to support The Peace Bus and the “Every Kid Eats” summer program. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41018 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $10,000, to fund entertainment and arts programming at the 2022 Hilltop Street Fair. [Council Member Blocker]

RES41025 – A resolution consenting to delay the transfer of the Carlton Center Building to the University of Washington Tacoma. [Council Member Blocker]

RES41028 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $5,000, to sponsor the 2nd Annual University of Washington Tacoma Celebrando Communidad: Latinx Celebration and Awards. [Council Member Diaz]

RES41042 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $5,000, to support the Tacoma Urban League Empowerment Awards and ongoing efforts to create a more livable Tacoma. [Council Member Blocker]

RES41046 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $5,000, to sponsor the Mayor’s Youth Commission of Tacoma travel to the National League of Cities conference. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41044 – A resolution appointing J. Manny Santiago to the Tacoma Public Library Board of Trustees to fill an unexpired term to expire December 31, 2026. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41069 – A resolution directing the City Manager to support the Economic Development Committee in reviewing and suggesting recommendations on how to improve communications and better support local businesses. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41074 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $5,000, to sponsor the 2022 Santa Parade. [Council Member Diaz]

RES41094 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $9,019.84, to reimburse the cost of barricades that supported the Día de los Muertos procession. [Council Member Walker]

RES41106 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $10,000, to provide education and outreach for the Links to Opportunity project during the construction phase. [Council Member Daniels]

RES41105 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $35,000, for the restoration of the street clock on Broadway in Downtown Tacoma. [Council Member Rumbaugh]

RES41104 – A resolution adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of “Antisemitism” for the City of Tacoma, to serve as a tool to identify and combat antisemitism. [Council Member Rumbaugh]

RES41107 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $20,000, to support the Tacoma Community House in assisting Ukrainian refugees with direct client specific assistance for essential needs and programs. [Deputy Mayor Ushka]

RES41108 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $10,000, to support the implementation of a faith community audit. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41109 – A resolution authorizing the one-time use of Council Contingency Funds, in the amount of $20,000, to support the convening of community conversations on homelessness in partnership with the University of Washington Tacoma. [Mayor Woodards]

RES41110 – A resolution approving the cancellation of the following six regular City Council meetings in 2023: January 17, March 28, May 30, July 5, September 5, and December 26. [Mayor Woodards]

To see all the Ordinances and Resolutions passed, visit:
https://cityoftacoma.legistar.com/Legislation.aspx

Tacoma’s Infamous Graffiti Garages Coming Down

Several derelict downtown buildings, affectionately known as The Graffiti Garages, are now ready to be demolished.

The buildings located in the Old City Hall Historic District near 7th on Broadway gained notoriety about 10 years ago when they were designated as a place to do legal graffiti.

The property also made news from a homicide in the basement parking garage in 2018.

A few months ago, the property owners received approvals from the city for a 131-unit apartment project: https://www.djc.com/news/re/12146641.html

Crews have been preparing the buildings for demolition by removing doors, windows and other building components that could pose safety concerns.

The property is currently fenced off awaiting the wrecking ball.

Is Tacoma’s Housing Solution Hiding in Plain Sight?

By: Morgan Alexander
Published: July, 2022; updated October, 2022

According to the City of Tacoma, “the City must plan for 127,000 additional residents and 97,000 jobs by 2040.”[1]

Development of new housing in the City of Tacoma has lagged behind that of Pierce County and other nearby cities. Tacoma’s annual growth rate from 2021 to 2022 was .78%. By comparison, the City of Puyallup (1.17%), Pierce County (1.21%), Spokane (1.21%), and Seattle (1.30%) all had higher rates of growth.[2] What was once a statistical footnote has snowballed into a full-blown housing crisis. 

However, recent analysis indicates that housing for more than 6,000 households could be built using government-owned vacant and underutilized land in downtown alone.

Using data obtained from the Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer’s Office[3], this study focused on an area between South 4th and 21st streets along Tacoma Ave South. Public agencies including the University of Washington, the Pierce County Government, the City of Tacoma, and the Tacoma Public School District hold a significant amount of vacant and underutilized properties in this area. Nearly half a million square feet of prime buildable land sits underutilized.

With an assessed value of $30 million, the government agencies that own these properties pay no taxes. This is critical funding that could be benefiting the community by funding schools, emergency services, and other programs such as Percent for the Arts. Additionally, the long term sequestering of prime real estate puts more pressure on taxpayers, who must subsidize the cost of public services to these properties.

If the City of Tacoma is to stay on track for absorbing 127,000 new residents by 2040, government agencies must get serious about their role in making more housing available by letting go of vacant and underutilized properties. 

There is one caveat that comes with the estimated potential of housing units: the City of Tacoma must update its downtown zoning code.

Currently, there is a mix of zoning that has created odd combinations where on one side of the street there could be a maximum building height of 400 feet. However, across the street there is a maximum building height of 100 feet on one corner and 90 feet on the other corner. The City of Tacoma through its outdated zoning codes could be making the housing crisis worse by maintaining arbitrary zoning codes. The difference in potential housing is dramatic – ranging from 2,000 units based on existing zoning to over 6,000 units based on revised zoning codes.

Data Analysis
For the purpose of this study, we focused our attention on properties on and near South Tacoma Avenue from South 4th Street to South 21st Street. Within this parameter, two different areas with high concentrations of publicly owned vacant and underutilized land emerged:

One area is near the Pierce County Courthouse building with a bulk of the parcels owned by Pierce County which were acquired 20 years ago for the purpose of building a new County Administration campus. The project remains unfunded. 

The second area is further south along Tacoma Avenue with a bulk of the property owned by the University of Washington and is in the footprint for an unfunded future expansion of University of Washington Tacoma. Many of these parcels have now sat vacant and unused for over 30 years. The initial vision for UWT was that it would have a campus similar to that of University of Washington Seattle and have a mix of student housing and instructional facilities. The reality of the market however has led to the UWT campus developing for commuters with prime buildable land being used for parking lots.

By the Numbers
Square feet: 480,012
Acres: 11
Assessed value: $29,971,300
Number of parcels: 52
Potential new households added: 2,000-6,000

Number of parcels owned by state and local government agencies:
Tacoma Public Schools: 2
City of Tacoma: 5
Pierce County: 14
University of Washington/UWT: 31

Sources:
[1]https://www.cityoftacoma.org/cms/one.aspx?portalId=169&pageId=30055
[2] https://worldpopulationreview.com
[3] Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer data, downloaded June 2022

Tacoma Avenue, County Building area
Tacoma Avenue, UWT campus area

Back From the Brink: Walker Apartments in Downtown Renovated and Ready for Leasing

The historic Walker Building came close to adding it’s name to the list of vacant and neglected buildings in Tacoma.  Real close.

A long time apartment building, the Walker became dated and worn.

Walker_Apartments_Hotel

 

 

A few years ago, the condo boom hit Tacoma.   The plan was that the units at the Walker would be converted to condominiums and sold one by one.  A few were renovated, and the restaurant Maxwells opened on the first floor.   A secret cigar smoking room was set up for Tacoma’s illuminate to frequent.  However, when the condo market crashed, the renovations stopped and a vast majority of the units in the Walker remained unfinished and vacant.  They stay this way for years.

Now, however, it appears (hopefully) more units have been renovated in the Walker and they are starting to lease a new set, given that ownership changed earlier this year and that there has been significant work in the building lately.  A new sign went up yesterday on the building. Hopefully, more of the units are now ready to be occupied.

 

 

1455006_10201525729559578_316349303_n

Who will fill the apartments in the Walker?  State Farm workers? Military members? Hipsters upgrading?  We will see.  At any rate, seeing any historical building being renovated is reason enough to celebrate.  Having more people living in the grid will bring much needed additional life to the area.

From the Walker Apartment Facebook page:

1450771_764315886916870_513161952_n

1005003_764315856916873_183795633_n

1400544_767379196610539_2109037003_o

 Godspeed Walker Apartments.

 

 

34 Years After Stephen Cysewski’s Infamous Tacoma Walking Tour: Is Tacoma Finally Ready to Repair Itself?

There have been countless numbers of incredible historical photos taken of Tacoma.  However, perhaps no set better captures downtown Tacoma in a moment of time as well as Stephen Cysewski’s 1979 walking tour does during Tacoma’s arguably lowest point in it’s history.  In this year, Tacoma faced an incredible sense of despair and downtown Tacoma was nearly wholesale abandoned.

tacoma005

tacoma130

tacoma136

tacoma143

It has been written that “[d]uring this period: “Downtown Tacoma experienced a long decline through the mid-20th century. Harold Moss, later the city’s mayor, characterized late 1970s Tacoma as looking “bombed out” like “downtown Beirut” (a reference to the Lebanese Civil War that occurred at that time.) “Streets were abandoned, storefronts were abandoned… City Hall was the headstone and Union Station the footstone” on the grave of downtown.”*

 

tacoma142

Fast forward to 2013.  

Much has been improved in Tacoma since 1979, yet some of the same challenges remain including the basic look of the city, namely the streets. 

These pictures from the Stadium District a week ago in October 2013:

 

2013-10-27_17.04.29

2013-10-27_17.03.53

10-25-13_A2_PHP_East_T_St_and_East_Columbia_AVE_500_500_80_s_c1

 

Last photo courtesy of the Tacoma Weekly’s Pothole Pig.

For Tacomans who have lived in the city more than 10 years, we face a big psychological challenge: we become acclimated to the blight in the city including the poor condition of the streets.  After awhile, the condition becomes normal for us as we look upon and attempt to swerve around a maze of potholes.  We vainly urge visitors to Tacoma, our friends and family, to look past the atrocious condition of the city and try to convince them how great the City of Destiny is: “No really its a great city!” we plead.

Proposition 1 would make a meaningful next step in doing our part to repair and rehabilitate the city as earlier generations of Tacomans have. It would permanently fix 3600 potholes every year and repave 510 neighborhood blocks over 5 years. It’s cost would be spread to large corporations like Walmart and many other large entities who often pay very little tax.

However, in the end, this measure is more about us as citizens of Tacoma than the measure itself and where we are as city in 2013.

Are we Tacomans ready to take the next step in the reconstruction of the City and repair itself via Proposition 1 or we still stuck in the inherited mindset of it’s 1979 era blightful near abandoned past?

.

1379591_10201344658752921_530708534_n

___________________

*Erik Hanberg, An Exercise in Hope, Faith, Vision, and Guts, Weekly Volcano (Tacoma), December 24, 2008.

 

City Council Candidate Robert Thoms Gives His Position on Critical Issues in Tacoma

 

Robert Thoms

Below are the questions and responses sent to Robert Thoms candidate for Tacoma City Council Position 2, formally held by Washington State Legislator Jake Fey.  Robert Thoms was appointed to this seat nearly a year ago and is running for this position as well.  The questions being asked to city council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as parking, feather sign regulation/ban, and the barriers to the  efforts rebuilding Tacoma.  Patricia Lacy Davis is running against Thoms for the seat and gave her responses to the same questions here.

1) What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective councilmember?
Answer: 

My education has centered around public policy and leadership, as well as around my experiences as Commander in the U.S. Navy. I attended the Department of Defense Informational School and National Defense University Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) program for officers. I also have a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from State University of New York. I am completing my Master’s in Organizational Leadership from Gonzaga University.

My greatest education, though, has been decades of experience working around public policy and as a Navy Officer. Between 2000 and 2007, I worked as statewide Deputy Director for Senator Maria Cantwell. I was proud to open up Tacoma’s first Senate office in over 30 years to handle the specific opportunities of Tacoma businesses and constituents and to help advance Tacoma’s causes on the state and federal level. In Senator Cantwell’s office, I championed a number of successful efforts: making ASACRO take responsibility for clear-up efforts for its pollutive smelter in North Tacoma, opening the Crystal Judson Family Justice Center, and funding the “D” Street Overpass helping to open up commerce and waterfront access as well as protecting the Dome District. I understand how to develop public policy partnerships with the participation of leaders as the local, state, and federal levels. Moreover, I’ve built important relationships with public policy leaders that I am happy to leverage for Tacoma’s future.

As for books: Aftershock, The Next Economy & America’s Future, both by Robert Reich, Steven Covey’s Seven Habits of Highly Effective People (always use as a reference), and Freakonomics. Now reading Jane Jacobs’ classic, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, and many cool Star Wars books each night with my 1st grader. These books – (well, maybe not the Star Wars) – all represent my passions. I like to understand the methods and thoughts of successful leadership, and apply it using my experience, and a creative, collaborative, and thoughtful approach to policymaking. It’s what I’ve been doing for decades in public service. I am proud of the results, and look forward to continuing my work during this critical period for Tacoma’s future.

2) Growth management:
Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
Answer:

Density is key. We have, over the last handful of years, increased the opportunities to create density in the downtown core and mixed-use centers. These are decent fist steps; however, in order to truly get the density and amenities necessary to grow I believe we need to support a better economic policies in Tacoma. I will fight hard to get the type of amenities Tacoma deserves. We need to break through the current cycle where our resident have to drive 30 minutes north to shop and spend money because we don’t have the necessary amenities locally. This is often approached as a “chicken and egg problem”: do you build the retail or the density first? I don’t believe this is an either/or proposition. Having the right amenities is important not only to drive density but also vital to job growth, especially in our state and within the high tech and advanced manufacturing sectors. This exact point was recently made on NRP regarding how Google decided to expand its Washington State footprint. http://kuow.org/post/google-breaks-ground-kirkland-expansion. We can’t reply on corporations to provide their own amenities when considering Downtown Tacoma; we have to build our own vibrancy.
.

As a Tacoma City Councilman, I will fight to assure we have contiguous blocks of development: whether it be retail (anchor tenants being ideal) or housing and businesses and great food options. I will continue to develop policies that incentivize institutional investment in Downtown Tacoma. For instance, the city must keep up with the growth of UWT and partner with them. My goal is to double the enrollment of UWT within the decade. There are many tools we can use: including empowerment zones, hub zones, tax-increment financing, and LIDs as just a start, but, I bring experience in doing this exact reinvestment into a downtown. I ran Senator Cantwell’s office in Spokane from 2000-2003 when River Park Square was conceived, developed and the vision of a vibrant downtown came to fruition. I know it can be done, but it takes leadership, investment and a commitment to results and, as your Councilman, I am already leading across all these fronts. It’s important to build density, but it’s equally important to realize that vibrant communities entail more than building extra housing units. Tacoma is in a unique position because we have a good manufacturing base to hold onto remaining opportunities in the manufacturing-based economy. We must strive more to take advantage of America’s consumer-based economy; in many ways, we are only at the ground floor of taking advantage of Tacoma’s economic opportunities.
.
In my few months on the Council, I have already put these plans into action. I helped spearhead Tacoma’s first-ever Transportation Master Plan, and corresponding Transportation Commission, which will help to develop a long-term strategy for Tacoma’s roads, buses, bikes, and rail. I have worked with UWT to develop an Entrepreneurial Incubator for Veterans, a program that allows those participating to take products to market versus standard course work, a true economy building opportunity. This can be partnered with the FabLab to literally take a concept, to product manufacture to marketplace all within a few blocks in Downtown Tacoma. Currently, UWT has great ability to expand in the enrollment of those using the most robust GI Bill in our nation’s history, the Post-9/11 GI Bill. We could expand threefold the number of students coming from JBLM alone to UWT and our regional educational institutions. These are good first steps, many of them creating important tools by which we can grow Downtown infrastructure, business, and amenities. I will continue to build public policies and partnerships to drive this progress.
.
Finally, we should sustain partnerships with our existing downtown businesses. Not only am I willing to listen, I’m willing to do the hard, practical work necessary to make this happen. I was a leader on the City’s first ever Locality Preference passed by the Council earlier this year to help articulate our intent to support our local businesses. The State has made it hard for us to provide a preference, so I pushed through ordinance 28140 on March 26th this year, to create locality and sustainability factors in the evaluation and award of City contracts. The ordinance can be viewed at http://cms.cityoftacoma.org/cityclerk/Files/CityCouncil/RecentLegislation/2013/RL20130326.pdf.

A big part of working with local business is just getting the job done. I’ve also rolled up my sleeves and helped install a sidewalk cafe at Amocat after helping them with permitting issues. I’ve personally gone to bat over licensing and permitting challenges for our small businesses. I will continue championing local businesses, as we expand our amenities to create a vibrant, populous Downtown.

3) “Feather Sign” Regulation

Question: The Tacoma City Council recently passed an ordinance to ban feather signs in some parts of Tacoma. Some businesses such as Brown and Haley use feather signs and believe they increase sales. The city of Tacoma has purportedly held off on enforcing the feather sign law until some revisions or a repeal is considered. If elected Tacoma City Council, what regulation, if any would you support concerning feather signs in Tacoma. What areas, if any, should they be banned in?
.
Answer: If certain districts want to have limits on feather signs, I’m open to that, as my job is to represent the interest of my constituents as Councilman. However, I oppose a blanket ban, as I have not been convinced an outright ban is supported by businesses or citizens. I met with several businesses – including Brown and Haley and other downtown merchants – who had already invested in feather signs. I do not believe we need a citywide ban, especially with so many having already invested in such signs.
.
On a related note, I am pleased we are having a good discussion on signage. Having the new signs promoting our waterfront have been a welcomed addition and worth celebrating.

4) Parking Management

Question: Because of varied demand, Seattle has 9 different priced parking zones with based on demand. Olympia maintains 4 different priced zones. Portland 4. Even Spokane has two different rates for parking. Yet the City of Tacoma continues to charge the same rate for parking despite wildly different demand for parking in downtown Tacoma. Failing to vary rates on demand has resulted in large parking vacancy almost void of vehicles (such as on S. 7th by Puget Sound Pizza) and other areas which a parking space can rarely be found (such as in front of the UWT on Pacific Ave) What efforts would you support, if any, to have the City of Tacoma vary rates in downtown Tacoma to more closely track demand in that area?
.
Answer:
I have traveled all over the world and lived in numerous states during my time in the Navy and I know these are many different ways to address such issues. It’s my experience that having different inter-city parking rates is sound policy. The parking discussion in the City of Tacoma is still at the infancy stage in my opinion, but it is an important discussion. I worked hard to create the first-ever Transportation Master Plan, ensuring that parking must be a major component of this plan. Earlier this year, we set aside $500,000 to create this plan in partnership with the Transportation Commission to build upon the work done to date on this issue. We need to have a realistic discussion about how to practically implement paid parking, ensure off-street parking, and forge a path for future growth in parking needs as Downtown grows. Parking was a critical component in landing State Farm in Tacoma, and we can’t always try and cobble together parking needs at the last moment. To attract additional investment and confidence in Tacoma, we must have a plan that can provide the right parking regime. Our neighborhoods are also in need of parking support, so revisiting permit parking, etc., should be a part of this discussion moving forward. We can get it right, and our Master Plan will ensure a pragmatic approach where we recognize one size does not always fit all.
.
5) Rebuilding Tacoma

.
Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer: If I’d been on the City Council, I would have opposed the Sauro development. The failure to save the Luzon building, and adequately develop that spot, is a failure of leadership and vision for Tacoma in my opinion.
.
While I’m on the Council, I am going to have a plan that goes block-by-block to create development opportunities to increase density, increase jobs, and increase the amenities that Tacomans deserve. I will settle for nothing less than ensuring we don’t have vacant “holes” throughout our city that create a ‘Jack-O-Lantern effect.’ We, as a City, have done well with mixed-use centers in neighborhoods, but we’ve lagged behind with our vision and execution Downtown. Because I represent Downtown and believe Downtown has the capacity to be developed, I will continue to search for every policy tool, partnership opportunity, to promote investment in our urban core. I look forward to learning from the many great urbanists who call Tacoma home, so we can all lean our shoulders in toward shared goals to ensure progress and success. I have already begun to partner with our neighborhood councils to convene meetings, like the one I called on July 10th to address concerns for a strategy to address crosswalks.

6) What specific policy would you seek to have passed in the City of Tacoma, if any, if elected to the city council?

.
Answer: Although I have only been serving on the City Council since January, I have already worked hard to have the city focus on several public policies that I’m very proud of.
.

Uniform school zones – I have heard a lot of concern about public safety, especially as it relates to assuring that Tacoma is a comfortable, walkable city. This legislation will assure that speed zones near Tacoma’s schools are reasonable and consistent.

.

Transportation Master Plan – I expressed concern in my first week on Council about Tacoma’s ability to plan its transportation future long-term. The Transportation Master Plan is an important tool in our policy toolkit. It helps to develop long-term plans, with the input of a Transportation Commission, for Tacoma’s multimodal transit concerns – from sidewalks and parking, to buses, rail, and even Amtrak. This sort of long-term planning is critical to making sure Tacoma has the amenities it needs to grow and prosper. We invested $500,000 to ensure we have Tacoma specific control and coordination of transportation work in our City, never again will Amtrak, Sound Transit, BNSF etc. perform projects in our City that are not dovetailed into our master plan so we leverage such investments and ensure they meet our local transportation needs, that is just as important, if not more, than any regional need.

 

Fiscal Sustainability Commission – The Fiscal Sustainability Task Force provides a mechanism for members of the Government Performance and Finance Committee, along with private and public sector partners, non-profit interests and labor partners, to closely examine the City’s revenue structure and budget challenges.

.

“Local preference” provision – I worked on this issue for many years with leaders like Al Lynden and Chuck Heller and on March 26th 28140 on March 26th this year, to create locality and sustainability factors in the evaluation and award of City contracts. http://cms.cityoftacoma.org/cityclerk/Files/CityCouncil/RecentLegislation/2013/RL20130326.pdf. This is the sort of simple incentive that encourages economic growth and development in Tacoma.

I’ve worked with the UWT to create the first-ever Veteran’s Entrepreneurial Program. This program is the first in the nation of its kind, and its firs. It allows veterans and service members to use their GI Bill toward the creation of business plans and products. I will work on policies that try to expand, from 11% to as much as 50%, the use of the GI Bill at our local universities. There is no reason why our universities in Pierce County should not be the universities of first choice to the service members and veterans of JBLM. This is the sort of community engagement that will help expand UWT, a critical asset for Downtown Tacoma.
.

Of course, there’s a lot more work to be done. Just to give one example, I’d like to make a run at addressing the Harbor Maintenance Tax that the Port of Tacoma pays for dredging needs we don’t need because we are a deep water port. This is a federally mandated tax that is harming our Ports in the Northwest. I want to partner with our federal delegation to ensure we address this competitive advantage it has given Canadian ports over their American competitors. This would be achieved by imposing the equivalent of the Harbor Maintenance Tax on international cargo passing from Canada across the U.S. border. Overseas cargo headed for the United States by railroad or highway would pay its fair share; Vancouver and Prince Rupert would thus lose the artificial benefit they get from the Harbor Maintenance Tax. This challenge represents tens of millions of dollars of potential additional revenue for the Port. This money could be used by the Port to go toward local needs like road and infrastructure, such as improving Port of Tacoma Road.

.

To put it briefly, there are a lot of steps Tacoma can take to better-use its resources and assets, and to plan strategically for the future. I’ve lived all around the world, and I chose Tacoma as my home, and the place to raise my family. It’s the most important decision I’ve ever made. I made it for a reason. I’m deeply invested in Tacoma, and passionate about finding ways for Tacoma to make lasting investments in itself. Please join me in making Tacoma better.


7) What policy decision, if any, has the Tacoma City Council taken in the last 10 years do you disagree with? How would you have handled the issue differently if at all?
.
Answer: There are certainly decisions I would have made differently. I would have liked to see the City, in concert with the County, ensure the Luzon didn’t fall down and, if that could not be avoided, that we lead in a solution to ensure something took its place.

I also am a firm believer in monitoring projects within my district. While I’m on City Council, I will assure District 2 that any project near the size and scope of a Wal-Mart will not take shape without Council awareness and oversight. I plan to be laser-focused on partnering with those seeking to live, work, and do business in Tacoma. I will seek to assure that the Council keeps its ear to the ground more than ever before.

To that end, I encourage anyone with questions, comments, or concerns to email me at info@votethoms.org. Thank you all for the great conversations and the chance of serve.

– Councilman Robert Thoms

__________________

More more information on Robert’s campaign, see his campaign page.

Previously posted : Patricia Lecy-Davis gives her response to the same questions via the Tacoma Sun.

City Council Candidate Patricia Lecy-Davis Gives Her Position on Critical Issues in Tacoma

9622778071_6f230cc8bb_z

 

.

Below are the questions and responses sent to Patricia Lacy-Davis candidate for Tacoma City Council Position 2, formally held by Washington State Legislator Jake Fey.  Robert Thoms was appointed to this seat nearly a year ago and is running for this position as well.  The questions being asked to city council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as parking, feather sign regulation/ban, and the barriers to the  efforts rebuilding Tacoma. 

.
1) What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective councilmember?

Answer: 
Being a business owner in a creative service industry gives me a Myriad of skills needed to serve our community.
-Acceptance
-Intuition
-Initiative
-Listening
-Flexibility
-Communication
– Authenticity
-Commitment
-Humility
.
Understanding the needs of clients who sometimes are not able to clearly communicate what they actually want, sometimes not being able to confidently ask for what they need, and often mistaking the reality of other unspoken needs and desires being able to be addressed by a simple service seems very much like the job expected from a council member. I find most times people just want to be paid attention, authentically listened to and validated for their feelings. Occasionally there is not an actual solution, but being heard is enough.
Also employing creative people has taught me to be satisfied being a partner in this particular stage of someone’s growth. People are on their own journeys that belong to them. I simply am here to mentor and support someone to his or her next phase of evolution. Many of my staff members have gone on to be their own business owners. Some have chosen other careers. There is always a shelf life, and we all just show up as best we can for that period of time.
As an ALF alumni, becoming a servant leader is the most rewarding role to be engaged in.
.
Books: Now Discover Your Strengths, The Tipping Point, The Four Agreements, Reveille for Radicals, and Who Moved My Cheese.
.

2) Growth management: Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
.
Answer: 
There is a great need for collaboration between Tacoma and Pierce County regarding this issue. The expansion of communities farther out from our core create a drain on services, increasing costs, and continue to disconnect us more and more. Density is a crucial piece of the puzzle for the future of transportation, quality of schools, the environment, and even food safety and sustainability. We need to recognize that trading farmland for strip malls is not the way to responsibly enhance our society. Looking for innovative ways to grow food, and create clean energy is very achievable in our area, and we really need to have a regional conversation about what we want Tacoma to “GROW” like in the next 5/10/20 years.
.
3) “Feather Sign” Regulation Question: The Tacoma City Council recently passed an ordinance to ban feather signs in some parts of Tacoma. Some businesses such as Brown and Haley use feather signs and believe they increase sales. The city of Tacoma has purportedly held off on enforcing the feather sign law until some revisions or a repeal is considered. If elected Tacoma City Council, what regulation, if any would you support concerning feather signs in Tacoma. What areas, if any, should they be banned in?
.
Answer: 
I’m very frustrated by the recent decision made by council regarding feather signs. Not because I like them, nor do I really want to see a plethora of them downtown OR down So. Tacoma Way. My frustration is the personal bias with which this decision was made. Also making a blanket restriction on them so quickly rather than taking the initiative to develop a comprehensive sign code involving businesses in the conversation from neighborhoods, mixed use and commercial centers was unfair. I do not believe that all businesses are the same, and have the same needs and strategies to attract clients. There are many communities dealing with this discussion currently, and we could learn from some of them solutions that have been determined.
.
4) Parking Management Question: Because of varied demand, Seattle has 9 different priced parking zones with based on demand. Olympia maintains 4 different priced zones. Portland 4. Even Spokane has two different rates for parking. Yet the City of Tacoma continues to charge the same rate for parking despite wildly different demand for parking in downtown Tacoma. Failing to vary rates on demand has resulted in large parking vacancy almost void of vehicles (such as on S. 7th by Puget Sound Pizza) and other areas which a parking space can rarely be found (such as in front of the UWT on Pacific Ave) What efforts would you support, if any, to have the City of Tacoma vary rates in downtown Tacoma to more closely track demand in that area?
.
Answer:
I believe that paid parking is, and has been a good thing for most businesses in Tacoma based on the feedback I have heard from both businesses and customers. The purpose of paid parking is and SHOULD be solely for creating a regular 15% vacancy for visitors. The complaints about parking have usually been from folks who do not understand that purpose, and want to park in front of their own businesses, or did not realize the past problems of City employees consistently taking up all available parking. Not all businesses have the same customer patterns and needs, nor do all areas have the same parking patterns, so It is crucial that we become resilient and intentional with our system. The cost of the long term garages need to be balanced with the cost of on street parking, so that frequent parking moves to garages affordably. 
It must be more attractive for someone to desire paying for garage long term parking vs. continuing to park on the street. In the UWT area, the 2 hour limit is a challenge because students tend to push the envelope by parking to attend their classes. Adjusting that area to 90 min. may be a solution, since the parking fill rate is more like 105%, spaces fill at about a 20-30 second rate. Other areas may warrant a longer limit because 2 hours is not long enough to go to the dentist, or doing lunch AND shopping is not possible, In that area, maybe the rate should be higher and limit longer. 
We have the technology, we should employ the willingness to be resilient and flexible with this system to make it work to it’s fullest potential. The most frustrating part is the aggressive ticketing for things that are seemingly “unrelated” to parking, like tabs expired, wheels not turned when there is no hill, and being too far from the curb. There should also be a gracious commitment to at least a 5 min. leeway on ticketing. “Revenue” is not supposed to be a directive of the system.
.
5) Rebuilding Tacoma Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer: 
Our building codes and regulations need to be aligned with our stated desires. Our regulatory inconsistencies are a huge barrier in Tacoma. If we could get out of the way and provide a clear path for things like “Live/work” “Work/live”, apodments, communal living, and urban growing, density wouldn’t be an issue. I have a hard time understanding why it costs more to rehab an old building, than tear it down and build new. There are ways to exempt the 60/40 flaggings of needing to do seismic upgrades, for people who are “doing the right thing” innovatively and efficiently. 
Putting in a sprinkler system that costs the building owner 1000’s of dollars shouldn’t go against their threshold of investment casting them more regulation and money. They should get a credit for it. I will continue to work with Planning and development services to break down these barriers on or off council. I have created working relationships with directors of theses departments and have frequently helped business and building owners communicate effectively getting to good desired end results. It can get better still though. There is a willingness to craft a culture of getting to “yes.”
.
6) What specific policy would you seek to have passed in the City of Tacoma, if any, if elected to the city council? 7) What policy decision, if any, has the Tacoma City Council taken in the last 10 years do you disagree with? How would you have handled the issue differently if at all?
.
Answer:
I would advocate for Business B&O restructuring. I’m not talking about getting rid of B&O but creating a more innovative and sustainable methodology. I’ve been educated on some specific language that ends up in us leaving a great deal of money on the table, and I also feel that the concept of “exemption” could be attached to more of an incentive type program like rewarding businesses for innovative and green practices, paid sick leave, etc. Give the “Good Actors” ways to submit for exemptions rather than a blanket gross earning threshold.

Also, there is a great need for the challenge of “Lowest Bid” language in contracts. This has a lot of unintended consequences, often results in poor quality of work, breeds bad practices, and low wages, and often costs more in the long run by the job not being done correctly the first time.
__________________

More more information on Patricia’s campaign, see her campaign Facebook page.

Justin Camarata Joins Tacoma Sun as a Political Analyst for 2013 Elections

pic1.
.
.
Compared to Seattle’s contentious local elections, the primary election for City of Tacoma voters is a sleeper.  The only race on my ballot was for the Port Commissioner. Yet, there will be come some excitement in November as two Tacoma City Council races are in play as well as a Tacoma School Board race:
.
1) Olgy Diaz is challenging councilmember Joe Lonergan for the seat on District #5.
.
2) Patricia Lacy-Davis is challenging councilmember Robert Thoms for District #2.

.
Thankfully, Tacoma resident Justin Camarata has agreed to help out in the effort for the Tacoma Sun and sift through all of the press releases and media images and get to the heart of the issues.
.
Here is his bio:
.
“Justin Camarata is a University of Washington graduate in Political Science and a North End resident. He works in account management and marketing for Seattle-area internet companies and, when his two small boys allow, volunteers for Tacoma commissions and causes including the Ethics Board, the North End Neighborhood Council, and various political campaigns. He is particularly interested in exploring the intersection of new urbanism, local government, and technology. (He’s still trying to dream up the next great urban mobile app.) Books that have influenced Justin’s thinking on cities and urban issues include Jane Jacobs’ ‘The Death and Life of Great American Cities,’ Donald Shoup’s ‘The High Cost of Free Parking,’ and P.D. Smith’s ‘City: A Guidebook for the Urban Age.'”
.
You can find Justin  and connect with him on his on Facebook, LinkedIn profile, Google+,.
.
Justin is a veracious student, reader and everything Tacoma.   Exit 133 defunct condo map?  He had watched it rise and fall.  Tacoma’s Chinese tunnels? He has walked them.  Former Mayor Bill Baarma’s 456 page 1973 Doctoral Thesis on the City Manager system? Memorized.
.
I look forward to Camarata’s future posts on this year’s election for the betterment of the City of Destiny and to advise the rest of us on all things Tacoma.
.
-Erik Bjornson

.

308002_736045392400_273246751_n

A Conversation with Candidate Jeannie Darneille

Below are the questions and responses sent to Jeannie Darneille candidate for Washington State Sendate District #27.

The questions being asked to Washington State Legislative candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the best method rebuilding Tacoma Streetcars, digital billboards, pollution in Tacoma and addressing the Felon Dumping Ground Issue.

1) Education and Experience
Question:
What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Washington State Legislature? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective legislator?
Answer:
My legislative and professional careers have dovetailed to prepare me well for service in the Washington State Senate.  I have served for 12 years in the Washington House of Representatives, and have held many positions of influence:  I was elected to leadership as a Vice Chair of the Democratic Caucus, and appointed to chair two important fiscal committees, General Government Appropriations and the Caseload Forecast Council.  I have also served as the vice chair of the House Ways and Means Committee for the last two years, and have developed an in-depth understanding of the state budget.  My professional career as a director of non profit community based organizations has given me a comprehensive understanding of the way state services are provided, and a passion to provide these in cost-effective, results-centered ways.  I have, both in my professional and legislative career, depended on my ability to draw people together to reach consensus.  My legislative career shows a long history of fighting for Pierce County and Tacoma, whether it is funding for the Washington State History Museum, or fighting to assure that Pierce County is not the dumping ground for felons.
As the eldest of six in a military family, our family moved enough that I attended 15 schools by the time I graduated from high school. I received my bachelor’s degree in art history at Western Washington University, with a Masters in Education (Higher Education Administration) at Colorado State University.
Books: I am reading “The Quotable Kennedys” by Bill Adler, but find that reading current research and analysis pertaining to issues facing government consumes more of my time than reading books.
2) Growth management:
Question:
Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
Answer: The Legislature can require local governments to strictly conform to growth management principles, and work on educating stakeholders and the public on the advantages to denser communities.
Our local government can take steps to reduce urban sprawl and add density to the City of Tacoma by working collaboratively with the Washington State Departments of Commerce and Transportation to promote the development of multi- family homes near affordable transit options.  Especially in the denser Tacoma areas, we need to find ways to provide housing where there is the greatest amount of demand so that rental prices don’t continue to creep upwards and prevent families from living in the most livable and walkable areas or aren’t forced to move out.  Fortunately, much of my community supports increasing urban density and creating livable, walkable neighborhoods in Tacoma.  I’ve worked to create more density in downtown Tacoma through revitalization efforts to enhance those goals.
3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
Question: Despite the recent laws passed in the Legislature, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf.   Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County? Does the Department of Corrections need more oversight as to where they place and/or subsidize felons to live?
Answer:
Criminal justice issues have been a priority for me during my legislative tenure. I have learned that transitioning felons back into society after their incarceration is over has to be one of the most complex issues that society faces. 97% of all felons do return to the community.  As with many other issues, the role of the state Legislature in where felons live when they are released from prison is nuanced.  The legislature passed a bill known as “The Fair Share Law” which requires a released felon under supervision of the Department of Corrections to return to their county of origin.  However, fair share only applies to those under supervision:  those who are not under supervision may live wherever they wish.  Our community is currently facing a situation where community members are upset over the potential of a halfway house for former felons, which is bringing to light the different roles and responsibilities of local vs. state governments.
I have a long history of working to protect Pierce County from becoming home to a disproportionate number of felons:  I was the only vote in the House of Representatives against placing the civil commitment center for sex offenders on McNeil Island, and I will continue to address the issues of re-integrating felons into the community after their sentences are over.  I also have a long history of trying to help former felons re-integrate into the community, and worked for 9 years on a bill that helped 140,000 people who had served their prison terms regain their voting rights.  I think that balancing regulation with programs that help felons re-integrate is the appropriate role for the state.
Former County Prosecutor Gerry Horne led the effort to educate the Pierce County delegation in the legislature about this issue and I continue to attend bi-monthly meetings convened by current Prosecutor Mark Lindquist on this issue.
4) Rebuilding Tacoma
Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the Washington State Legislature take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
Answer:
Tacoma has suffered from the recession in many ways. Many businesses have been forced to close and the populace is experiencing high unemployment. But, the progress made in rebuilding Tacoma is significant, and the museum district, the theater district, the University of Washington Tacoma, and vibrant business districts like 6th Avenue all attest to this. Rebuilding Tacoma is a venture that requires all levels of government and civic participation to achieve. The state capital budget has, and can continue to assist in rebuilding Tacoma. Projects like the Foss Waterway Seaport Museum have been funded through the capital budget, and I have been proud to work with local organizations that are willing to do the work to create appropriate projects.  Transit and density are extremely important in rebuilding Tacoma, to create the walkable and liveable communities that people seek.
5) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars
Question:Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. The latest Sound Transit measure passed by voters sets aside money for LINK extension in Tacoma. Gas prices are now near record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps on the legislative level, would be needed to be taken to make this happen?
Answer:
While I do support restoring Tacoma’s streetcars I have not seen their restoration as a high priority by local government.  I think streetcars can be an important part of the transit system, but, from a legislative standpoint, there is limited support available to transit-oriented projects. Legislative Transportation committees deal exclusively with roads, highways, and our ferry system. The Washington State Constitution restricts the use of the gas tax funding to streets and roads, and it cannot be used to support transit.  As a result, transit agencies are dependent upon the sales tax, which is extremely vulnerable to a recession.  All transit agencies are facing large budget shortfalls and are struggling to even maintain existing services.  I have supported legislation to increase the funding options for transit systems, and feel that overall reform to our revenue system is needed to fully address the needs for mass transit.  I would also support using revenue collected from tolls to fund transit options.
6) Pollution Issues in Tacoma
Question: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the air quality criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?
Answer:
Again, pollution issues require a collaborative approach between citizen groups, state and local government, the federal government, industry and the public.  The largest single source of greenhouse gas emissions continues to be transportation, and reducing the use of single occupant vehicles is the single most important thing that we can do to reduce this form of pollution.  All of the issues applying to growth management are applicable here:  creating density and reducing sprawl, creating walkable communities, and encouraging transit and transit-oriented development projects for expanding access to affordable housing.
The South Tacoma Air Quality Non-Attainment points out another important role that the State can play in reducing pollution include addressing the issue of wood smoke (a bill was passed in the legislature last year to address this, which I supported) and incorporation of the Complete Streets and Low Impact Development standards to address storm water pollution.  The state also plays a very important role through the Puget Sound clean up.  As the chair of the General Government Appropriations Committee, and vice chair of the Ways and Means Committee, I have worked to balance huge deficits in the state budget in a way that protects funding for Puget Sound clean up, educating people about storm water runoff, and other environmental projects.
7) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson
Question: A few years ago, former City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached. What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?
Answer:
There are no easy answers to this question. The causes that increase criminal activity are found in the areas of undiagnosed and untreated mental illness, untreated chemical dependency, poverty, joblessness, lack of education and training, a lack of civic engagement, anger and despair, and many others. No single approach will result in longtime benefit to individuals, their families, or the community. Programs that are evidence-based are the key, but we need wider access to them. They include everything from access to quality healthcare, early childhood education, and expanding training that leads to family wage jobs.  Crime rates rise and fall with unemployment rates. When opportunities to make money vocationally decline, quick pay-off crimes like robberies go up. That’s one of the reasons why it’s so important we ensure that citizens have access to vocation training and our system allows for retraining as our industries evolve
VIII) Tacoma’s Billboard Ordinances
Question: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at:
http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards. What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?
Answer:
I have followed this issue.
9) Billboards Issue
Question: As you know, the Tacoma City Council has banned digital billboard. However, there have been attempts in the Washington State Legislature to pre-empt cities, as other states have done, and place more billboards, including digital billboards throughout the state.
What is your position on the issue?
Answer:
I would oppose these efforts.
_________________
For more information, see Jeannie Darneille’s website.

Laurie Jinkins Takes a Stand on the Issues in the Tacoma Sun

Below are the questions and responses sent to Laurie Jinkins candidate for Washington State Legislature District #27.

The questions being asked to Washington State Legislative candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the best method rebuilding Tacoma Streetcars, digital billboards, pollution in Tacoma and addressing the Felon Dumping Ground Issue. 

Tacoma Sun Candidate Questionnaire Candidate: Laurie Jinkins Position: Washington State Legislature District #27

1) Education and Experience

Question: What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Washington State Legislature? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective legislator?

Answer:

I earned my bachelor’s and master’s degrees  in Business from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and later a Juris Doctor from Seattle University School of Law (then the University of Puget Sound School of Law). I also completed executive studies at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government.  I started my career litigating child abuse and neglect cases for the state Attorney General’s Office. I then shifted my career toward public health, eventually serving as an assistant secretary of health at the state Department of Health before taking the position of deputy director of the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department, where I continues to serve.  I’ve spent 25 years serving the community on numerous non-profit boards and feel that work has really helped me understand the community in important ways.

Books:  RR Anderson’s, Tacomic series; A lesson before dying; Taylor Branch’s MLK biography trilogy; People Magazine subscriber for over 20 years; Profiles in Courage; Autobiography of Robert Moses, Dykes to Watch Out For, A good Rain and The Worst Hard Time both by Timothy Egan; Garlic and Sapphires by Ruth Reichl; Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich; Plato’s collected Dialogues; Blink and The tipping point both by Malcolm Gladwell, Backlash by Susan Faludi; The Way We Really Are by Stephanie Coontz; The Social Transformation of American Medicine by Paul Starr; Calvin & Hobbes; King of the World by David Remnick; Friday Night Lights by H.G. Bissinger; The Jewish Book of Why; The hour I first believed by Wally Lamb Live from New York:  An uncensored history of Saturday Night Live; The Ayatollah Begs to Differ and The Ayatollahs’ Democracy both by my brother in law Hooman Majd; Never Work for a Jerk; A Walk in the Woods by Bill Bryson; Soul of a Citizen by Paul Rogat Loeb; Ann Rule murder mysteries; Everything bad is Good for You by Steven Johnson; Boomerang:  Travels in the New Third World by Michael Lewis; Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer; Wild:  From Lost to found on the Pacific Crest Trail by Cheryl  Strayed; Inside National Health Reform by John E McDonough; Malcolm X:  A Life of Reinvention by Manning Marable; and Tattoos on the Heart by Gregory Boyle.
2) Growth management:

Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?

Answer:

I tend to be a data driven person.  I think that the data speaks for itself, but must be combined with evidence that urban density can work successfully with affordability. In order to increase growth in Tacoma, mixed use development and integration of low income housing throughout a community are imperative. Additionally, we live in a capitalist society.  The only way to increase density, and preserve open space and farmland is if those who own it can make more money by keeping it as farmland than they can by selling it for development.
3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues

Question: Despite the recent laws passed in the Legislature, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf. Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County? Does the Department of Corrections need more oversight as to where they place and/or subsidize felons to live?

Answer:

The “fair share” legislation passed by the legislature a number of years ago is both working and not working at the same time.  It has assured that released offenders return to their “home” county, but, the legislation doesn’t require placement below the county level.  This means that a released offender who identifies Pierce County as their “home” community can locate anywhere within Pierce County.  Locally, this results in some of our neighborhoods having a much higher population of released offenders than is ideal.  My legislative colleagues and I pay a great deal of attention to DOC implementation of this legislation because it was the Pierce County Delegation that spearheaded it.  We need to continue to work with local communities and DOC to assure that particular neighborhoods don’t become dumping grounds for released offenders.  Data does tell us that providing released felons who would otherwise be homeless with housing vouchers for a limited period of time actually decreases recidivism.  However, more oversight about where this subsidized housing is located may be helpful.  Frankly, one of the most important things we can do is make sure that both our incarceration and release policies are based on what research tells us works.
4) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the Washington State Legislature take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

While serving on the Capitol Budget and Transportation committees, I was a co-sponsor of the 2012 Jobs Now Act. This investment into our state’s infrastructure will create new schools, affordable housing, and crucial investments in transportation, as well as over 18,000 jobs in our state. Here in the 27th district, the Jobs Act will build an allied health building at TCC, advance the cleanup of Ruston Way & Commencement Bay, help renovate of the Broadway Center & Foss Seaport, and expand our low-income housing resources. When re-elected, I will continue to work to use the capitol budget to fund improvement to infrastructure and much needed jobs.

5) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars

Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. The latest Sound Transit measure passed by voters sets aside money for LINK extension in Tacoma. Gas prices are now near record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps on the legislative level, would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

Answer:

I would love to see a vibrant, expansive public transit system throughout Tacoma and the greater Puget Sound, but even with the funds from the last Sound Transit measure it is still incredibly difficult to fund large projects like the expansion of Tacoma’s streetcar system.

6) Pollution Issues in Tacoma

Question: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the air quality criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer:

I was the prime sponsor of SHB 2326, which was signed by the Governor this past legislative session.  Pierce County is the only Washington jurisdiction out of compliance with federal clean air standards due to particulate matter in our air.  As a result, our residents suffer more health consequences and businesses wishing to locate in Pierce County must meet more stringent air quality standards.  This results in severely negative economic development consequences for our community.  A majority of this problem is caused by the use of wood burning stoves.  I was able to work with public health, municipal governments, business, community advocates and environmentalists to craft a bill that will help bring us into clean air attainment, resulting in a healthier community.

7) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson
Question: A few years ago, former City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached. What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?

Answer:

I believe that there are several steps necessary to reduce crime in Tacoma.   First and foremost, we must strengthen the economy, helping to create jobs, and providing food, shelter, and other essential services to those in need.  Second, there are a number of gang and other proven prevention activities that we should continue to fund and expand.  An investment in proven prevention interventions is nearly always a cheaper, more long term fix than investing in incarceration.  Finally, we need continue investments in evidence based policing, so that we are using the proven interventions our law enforcement personnel need to respond to crime quickly and efficiently.

Without additional revenue sources we’ll be hard pressed to maintain current services,  let alone increase services, and that is why I advocate for revenue reform. I believe that we need a tax system that is fair, adequate and stable. Washington State’s current tax base relies too heavily on regressive, unreliable taxes, and I am a leader in promoting systemic reform. It will take committed legislators and citizens some time to replace our regressive system with a progressive tax system, however, I am committed to making this happen.
VIII) Tacoma’s Billboard Ordinances

Question: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at:

http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards. What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?

Answer:

0%, but thanks for the link.  I’ll try to read some of these over the interim.

9) Billboards Issue

As you know, the Tacoma City Council has banned digital billboard. However, there have been attempts in the Washington State Legislature to pre-empt cities, as other states have done, and place more billboards, including digital billboards throughout the state.

What is your position on the issue?

Answer:

I oppose efforts for the state legislature to pre-empt cities’ efforts to restrict billboard use.

____________________

For more information, see Laurie Jinkins website.

Jack Connelly Talks With the Tacoma Sun

Below are the questions and responses sent to Jack Connelly, candidate for Washington State Senate District #27.

The questions being asked to Washington State Legislative candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the best method rebuilding Tacoma Streetcars, digital billboards, pollution in Tacoma and addressing the Felon Dumping Ground Issue. 

Tacoma Sun Candidate Questionnaire Candidate: John Connelly Position: Washington State Senate District #27

1) Education and Experience

Question: What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Washington State Legislature? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective legislator?

Answer:

Education: Lakes High School, 1974; Stanford University, B.A. Human Biology 1978 (also fulfilled requirements for degree in Psychology;) J.D. University of California, Hastings College of Law, 1981; Ongoing courses in continuing legal education, both as student and as a lecturer.

Experience: Work as an attorney and advocate for 31 years. Worked through college and law school, first in the cannery at Nalleys, then as a swim coach in Palo Alto, and Lakewood. During Law School I clerked for a law firm in Palo Alto after my first year, then with Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell in Tacoma after my second year. After Law School I returned to Tacoma and began working with Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell as an attorney. I became a partner in 1986 and board chair (managing partner) in 2000 and 2001. I was a two time member of the Board of trustees of the Tacoma Pierce County Bar Association and invited onto the Board of the Washington State Association for Justice. I held several offices in the Washington State Association for Justice, including chair of the legislative committee – a committee I served on for a number of years. In 2005 I was elected President of WSAJ. I ran the campaign against I-330. As a lawyer, I received a number of honors including, WSAJ Trial Lawyer of the year in 2000, American Board of Trial Advocates Trial Lawyer of the Year in 2007, Membership in Best Lawyers in America, Selection as one of the top 100 lawyers in Washington State by Washington Law and Politics Magazine and one of Seattle Area’s best lawyers by Seattle Magazine.

During my tenure with the Washington State Association for Justice I worked on legislative issues and served on the legislative committee for a number of years. I also served for a period on the Tacoma Pierce County Bar Associations Legislative Committee.

In my work I have handled civil rights and injury cases on behalf of minorities (e.g. the Puyallup School District case), the elderly, abused children (e.g. the OK Boys Ranch cases); disabled, firefighters (Pang Warehouse fire, 30 Mile Fire), Police Officers (Lakewood Police Shootings), people whose rights have been undermined by the State (cases against the Department of Corrections and DSHS) some employment cases (Barbara Corey, Cases by employees of Dale Washam) and other cases on behalf of families and people whose rights have been violated. The skills from this advocacy and negotiation are directly transferable to the work in the legislature.

Books: I am a fairly voracious reader and all the books I read influence my thinking. I particularly like reading anything about John F. Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln. Examples of recent books I have read include:

Jack Kennedy, Elusive Hero, Christopher Mathews

Bill Bradley, We Can All Do Better

Team of Rivals (Book on Tape); Doris Kearns Goodwin

George Washington’s Sacred Fire, Peter Lillback, Jerry Newcombe

Home Grown Democrat, Garrison Keillor (Book on Tape)

The Fiery Trial, Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery, Eric Foner

The Cost of Choice, Women Evaluate the Impact of Abortion, Erika Bachiochi

Lyndon Johnson, Master of the Senate, Robert A. Caro

2) Growth management:

Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?

Answer: Yes. We need to continue to build Tacoma’s inner core. Tacoma has some of the most beautiful areas in the State. We need to make sure we are keeping the city beautiful for people visiting it. This includes excellent parks and small things such as filling potholes and mowing right of ways. One of the great difficulties with Tacoma right now is that it is not seen as an attractive area for businesses, including small businesses.

This causes them to move to strip malls outside the city and in suburban areas rather than into Tacoma. It is extremely important that we begin working to make Tacoma a more livable and attractive city. We have done a good job with the museums but need to continue this work. This includes continuing the “promenade” from the Thea Foss waterway all the way to Point Ruston and on to Point Defiance. It includes repairing our infrastructure in areas such as the Hilltop and Martin Luther King Way. It includes encouraging and assisting small businesses in the downtown area, in East Tacoma, on the hilltop and throughout Tacoma. Work in the legislature to assist small businesses must include review of the B&O tax structure and review of the amount of regulation so that we are not strangling small , start-up businesses before they can get up and going. Additionally, we need to improve our voice.

Spokane runs certain events such as Bloomsday and the Hoopfest which draw thousands to the City and its message to those people coming into the city reflects great civic pride. Tacoma needs similar events and needs to make sure that its message after events such as the Fourth of July celebration (Freedom Fair) on the waterfront is similarly positive. We did this with the Tall Ships. We can do more of this. I should finally note that we absolutely must improve our schools so that people want to move into Tacoma and want to start their businesses here. We have many opportunities such as at the Port of Tacoma to bring more business and more residents to Tacoma. Extension of I-167 to the Port would add jobs and allow much new spinoff business. But people are only going to want to move and live here if we are working on building a beautiful city with quality schools and amenities that continue to make Tacoma a great place to live.

3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues

Question: Despite the recent laws passed in the Legislature, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It? http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf. Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County? Does the Department of Corrections need more oversight as to where they place and/or subsidize felons to live?

Answer:

Yes. I have read the report and have worked in this area. At our law firm we have handled cases involving felons who are “dumped” in Tacoma. This increases the crime rate and exposes residents to increased risks. One of the most difficult things for a felon who has been incarcerated is transitioning back into society. The Department of Corrections needs to spend more time overseeing how the individual felon is going to be transitioned, who he/she is going to live with and how they are going to avoid reoffending. Specific steps include creating an ombudsman position for this purpose, partnering with nonprofit and for profit groups who provide resources for released felons, (the Irma Gary House is an example) assisting with creation of new similar groups to work with transitioning of felons so that they have a meaningful chance of returning to society, finding work and leading a productive life; working to place limits on the number of acceptances in this area, and making sure that DOC has positions available in other areas.

5) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the Washington State Legislature take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

This needs to be an area of primary focus right now. Our delegation to Olympia in past years has not focused on business and the downtown core. That fact and the recession has contributed to the empty storefronts and empty downtown core that we are all familiar with. Rebuilding of downtown Tacoma will require a focus on business, especially small business, working with the Chamber of Commerce to make Tacoma a city that is friendly to business, obtaining funds and federal monies for infrastructure such as I-167 to the Port of Tacoma, infrastructure on the hilltop and East Tacoma, and assistance to businesses throughout the city. Partnerships with groups such as the Incubator and the Chamber should occur to increase participation and “buy in” to this development.

This is an important time for Tacoma and this time could be seized as a major transition point. The additional business coming into the Port of Tacoma, if properly embraced, could bring much meaningful change to this City. The additional business could bring a tremendous amount of spinoff business. In order for this to occur we are going to have to make sure that we are making it easy for this to occur. This will require good ingress and egress from the Port, will require a City that is welcoming to business and will require work to make the city more attractive and livable for employees and business leaders.

The changes identified in this question won’t occur until we begin to work to make them occur. The Sauro site, for example, could be the site of another skyscraper. Plans for such have been available. In order for that to occur, however, we need to work to attract businesses to the City so that a developer will be able to meet occupancy requirements and thus build it. Similarly, the Luzon site is a fantastic site for a business if Tacoma has an active busy, city core. I was asked at the last minute to try to step in and work with a group that wanted to save it. The historic building could have been saved and used for a business but businesses were not interested in locating in Tacoma at the time.

6) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars

Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. The latest Sound Transit measure passed by voters sets aside money for LINK extension in Tacoma. Gas prices are now near record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps on the legislative level, would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

Answer:

I would love to see the streetcar system continue to grow. We need to continue to build and improve our mass transit. The current streetcars are nice but don’t serve a wide enough area and, therefore, aren’t used as much as they could be. The answers to the previous questions about improving the City and its inner core all are important in building a City in which streetcar service makes sense and is used to reach the businesses in the City. As we build up the inner core there will be additional reason for streetcars.

From a legislative standpoint we need to take those steps that will assist small businesses (as well as large businesses) to build up our business base in the City. We need to continue to approve city amenities (including schools) and make Tacoma an attractive place for people to live. We need to take advantage of those funds and grants allocated to mass transit. The Hilltop would be another nice place for streetcars as we continue to build up the MLK Way corridor with Evergreen College as an anchor.
7) Pollution Issues in Tacoma

Question: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the air quality criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer: I think we do need to try to hold fast to pollution standards and work with businesses which aren’t getting there. We have been infamous for the “aroma of Tacoma.” This has improved markedly over the past years. Specific steps to reduce pollution include generation of funding to stop pollution from storm water runoff – including possible polluter pays approaches ( after notice and an opportunity to cure), legislative funding and support of projects such as the Puget Sound Action Agenda to protect and preserve Puget Sound, enforcement of goals for reduction of carbon emissions including tax incentives for success and potential payments for failing to achieve standards, continued work, research and funding of clean energy alternatives, potential amendment of the Growth Management Act to make local plans consistent with greenhouse gas emission limits (helping to build a livable city that is less reliant on automobiles). Development of mass transit and energy efficient alternatives to transit that involves more pollutants.

VIII) Crime Reduction Proposal by former City Manager Eric Anderson
Question: A few years ago, former City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached. What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?

Answer: Build up the business core. Provide jobs. Build community centers. Give Tacoma a strong positive voice and include all residents in the positive feeling about Tacoma and its residents. More events which build community. Less antagonism between Police and residents. Build strong and innovative schools so that kids feel good about going to school and good about their communities. Invest in early childhood education and keep parents involved in schools so that kids do not drop out. Studies have shown that good early childhood education keeps kids in school.

My wife and I are also involved in Safe Streets. This method of getting the community involved in prevention of crime is effective.

Continue to support Police services and ensure that the model followed by Police is to “protect and serve” the community.

9) Tacoma’s Billboard Ordinances

Question: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at:http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards. What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?

Answer:

I have read quite a few of them and all of them included in the TNT. I have followed this issue fairly closely.

10) Billboards Issue

As you know, the Tacoma City Council has banned digital billboard. However, there have been attempts in the Washington State Legislature to pre-empt cities, as other states have done, and place more billboards, including digital billboards throughout the state.

What is your position on the issue?

Answer

I don’t like digital billboards within the City. They are a major distraction and not attractive. I don’t think they add to the City’s sense of organization and well being.

____________________

For more information, see Jack Connelly’s website.


Tacoma City Council Candidate Michael Hardy Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:

Below are the questions and responses sent to Michael Hardy, candidate for Tacoma City Council District #7. This at-large district is current represented by councilmember David Boe who is running to be “retained” in the district.
.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the best method to restore the Winthrop Hotel, removing harmful Parking Requirements in downtown Tacoma, rebuilding Tacoma Streetcars, and addressing the Felon Dumping Ground Issue.
.
Tacoma Sun Candidate Questionnaire
Candidate:  Micheal Hardy
Position:  Tacoma City Council – At-Large No. 7

.
Q I: What education and experience do you have to qualify you to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective council member?
.
Answer: Graduating from Pierce College with Honors was a great accomplishment for me, and my AA degree included many business related courses. My studies at The Evergreen State College included classes in Project Management and Environmental Science. Serving as Commander of one of the largest Veterans Service Organization in the state has helped to prepare me for this position, as has my commitment as President of the Board of a local Non-Profit. No particular book has stood out as a guide to being an advocate of Tacomans; but Wolf’s Non-profit Management books have helped sharpen my focus, as has a series on Project management.
.
2) Growth management
.
Q II: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000.  If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?

Answer: Tacoma’s strength and character comes from its open area’s and its space. I would work to get the empty buildings rented,  the vacant storefronts leased, the empty condo towers that promised so much, and delivered so little, occupied. My plans would center on the population that is already in place, and the business owners who are working  hard yet struggling. These are the people who realize the beauty and opportunities that Tacoma has to offer. What we need downtown is jobs that offer permanent employment, not walking paths and exit Pagodas.
.
It has to be economic development that becomes the backbone of our elected leaders. To sit on our hands and watch Russel Investments move, and Nalley Valley shut down is maddening to Tacomans. These were firms who cared about Tacoma, who spent time here and enjoyed giving back and participating. Spending money to recruit business from outside Tacoma is not the same as having a business that wants to be here because they like it here.
.
Small business owners need the support that Tacoma can offer. Instead of being targeted as “cash cows”  for the city coffers they should be treated as partners. Business helps create an identity to communities. The infrastructure needed for these companies is already in place and with city support these firms will be here for decades. It is not my plan to pack more buildings into what we have, and ruin what I consider a gem.

3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
.
Q III: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It? http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf.  Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County?
.
Answer: Yes, the report has some great points, but should have been more in depth.  I would have liked input to the selection process used to place these felons and deviants in areas of Tacoma questioned. The report cites “saving money” as a reason for setting up work release centers but said nothing about how much it actually cost us, as residents. If property values decrease because neighborhoods become more dangerous, this hasn’t saved any money.
.
The “sprawl” issue discussed earlier should be added to this equation.  How many good families left Tacoma because of the felons, predators, and drug dealers that this policy placed among us?  How many businesses? The actual cost is much more to the residents than what this report or the News Tribunes series of stories leads us to believe.
.
Finally, I would like to see exactly where in Tacoma these offenders were placed. How many in East Tacoma, how many in the South End? Was placement fair or were these criminals placed in the less affluent areas of Tacoma – areas less likely to complain.
.
The Pierce County Sheriff’s web page relating to sex offenders and other criminals  misleads us. For example, in the District 1 area around Orchard and N 15th, there are three offenders within a one mile radius. But several blocks away in District 3, in the area of 12th and Union, there are 11 offenders residing inside a half mile radius. District 5 has nine “offenders” within a half mile radius of 66th and Warner, but one of these offender sites lists “multiple” residents, unnamed (in contrast to the other neighborhoods).
.
Why report differently? If we report by the half mile in districts 3 and 5, we should measure by the half mile in district 1.  If we list the offenders by name in districts 1 and 3, we should do the same in district 5. And “multiple offenders” is just not specific enough. (Info from the Pierce County Sheriff web page.)

4) Restoration of Winthrop Hotel
.
Question IV: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support, if any, to restore the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel?What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?
.
Answer: Yes, and I am one of the people who would love to see the Winthrop restored. But I don’t remember the Davenport being restored by Spokane; it was a private contractor whose business was restoring properties. Times have changed a bit since Walt Worthy did his rehab of the Davenport. Financing is undoubtedly harder to come by, but developers might be in a more generous mood with the business climate stalled. In order to receive my support the project would have to make financial sense, and use local talent to staff the construction jobs. And by local, I don’t mean workers coming down here from Seattle.
.
This job should be done as a private construction project. The city of Tacoma should not be in the hotel business, but could provide incentives to attract a better project. Examples of this would be including some low income housing in the project, to give the developer guaranteed income while helping low income residents. A grant might help the project, and maybe tax incentives could be offered.

.
5) Rebuilding Tacoma
.
Q V: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer: The government of the City of Tacoma already has a strong presence in downtown Tacoma, as does the Federal and State Governments. Private industries and business are needed to cap off the project that became a long and costly revitalization effort. We have to remember that rebuilding Tacoma means more than just spending money downtown. Tacoma is a vast area, with many neighborhoods that also have problems. If downtown is beautiful, but the area surrounding downtown is blighted, nobody is going to make the effort to travel downtown.
.
And honestly I like the downtown area as it is. I like that I can drive downtown  without gridlock, and I like that I can find parking in a reasonable amount of time. To me, the wonder of Tacoma, especially downtown, is the open spaces and panoramic views. The merging of ocean and mountain with our rolling hills and landscape is beautiful.
Mixed use centers are excellent solutions to “empty and blighted” buildings mentioned in this question –  they can be acquired and refurbished at reasonable cost. And still leave us with green space. The properties mentioned are not just surface level parking lots, they are what is left of 1) a 20 foot hole in the middle of downtown and 2) a dilapidated building that was on the verge of collapse.
.
And there were no options. We had a major employer that wanted to be here, and needed parking. There was no-one else who had a plan to develop this property, or showed interest. This was a win-win situation. The problem was the same with the other property –  there was no interest or plan to restore or rehab. Tacoma couldn’t leave a pile of brick and glass on the street. So, they  became a parking lots.
.
The term “vacant lots” is a developers term, a negotiating expression to acquire property at a reduced cost. Your “vacant lot” is my “natural space”, or “open field.” Other cities DO have this type of property – Tacoma is not unique in having sections of undeveloped land.
.
However, what we do with these properties is unique. We grow veggies there, and plant flowers, and walk our dogs. We take off our shoes and run our feet through the grass. Residents of Tacoma do not see an empty field and dream of development, and neither should Tacoma’s leaders. We should see the beauty in what we have, not in the changes we can make.

Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown
.
Q VI: Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing the cost of housing, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer: No. The city is not responsible for providing long term parking. Building apartment buildings and office towers that neglected parking is selfish and irresponsible. There are costs to living downtown, and parking is one cost that should be the burden of the property owner or vehicle owner. Building neighborhood centers or Mixed Use Centers that do not have parking available is short-sighted and wasteful. Paid parking during business hours helps customers, and businesses.  Short term paid parking is beneficial to downtown. The benefits of better parking design accrue to the community, rather than to the building, or property owner.

To have the designs of Seattle or Portland a goal of Tacoma would be a huge mistake. These cities are awful for walking and parking is a challenge. Understanding what we have here is the first step to making Tacoma the envy of the nation. There is not a better waterfront in the world, and our downtown is very accessible and user friendly. We don’t have to shoehorn other buildings and cram more development into our tight spaces. There are better options.

Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars

Q VII: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

Answer: No, I support bus routes over streetcars. Streetcars create more noise and traffic confusion. Streetcars are so much more expensive initially and have to be dedicated to a particular route. Overhead conductors are ugly, and require more poles to be placed.  The system as a whole makes me think of a jumbled birds nest. The infrastructure is already in place for buses, and when needs change, or streets are blocked by accidents or emergency vehicles, buses are easily rerouted.

Pollution Issues in Tacoma
.
Q VIII: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?
.
Answer:  Emissions from diesel and gasoline engines are the biggest contributors to fine particle pollution, but in Pierce County smoke from wood stoves are also a major problem.
The county’s air quality consistently drops in winter when more people heat their homes by burning wood. There are estimates that 75,000 homes are heated with wood burning stoves.
I have also heard a report about Tacoma’s air problem that suggested that the topographical features and terrain of Pierce County was a hindrance to free air flow.

.
Our vehicles get tested at every other registration period, so I don’t believe it is OUR vehicles. Our current pollution problem is due in part to our greatest asset, the Port of Tacoma. Truck traffic is huge in this area as we have one main road that handles vast numbers of combination vehicles. Locomotive delivery systems have not shown much improvement. We won’t close the port. No ban on wood stoves, or other heating systems is supported by me at this time. And changing the terrain is impossible.

Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson

Q IX: A few years ago, City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached.  What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?

Answer: City Manager Anderson’s goal is commendable and is working. These things take time, and the TPD has been very effective in identifying the major criminals in our area and putting them behind bars. Eric Anderson’s goal is supported by me, and I would be willing to give the city manager any tools or resources that he needs to get the job done.

Q X: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at : http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards.  What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?

Answer: I have read some of them. This does not seem to be an impossible hurdle, or a problem that can only be handled by legal action. As more and more cities and states ban these distracting signs it will become evident to Clear Channel that their signs are dangerous and put public safety at risk. A voter referendum on this matter would certainly help, as would public boycotts on any products advertised by Clear Channel.

Q XI What is your position in relation to the settlement proposal that the Tacoma City Council is considering regarding digital billboards?  Do you support it? If you were elected to the Tacoma City Council, would you authorize the City of Tacoma to expend financial resources to defend the Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard law?

Answer: Yes to a point. Negotiation seems to be an even better alternative, as brightness and contrast, as well as length of time of a particular ad appears are all negotiating points. So is donating billboard time to highlight city programs, and emergency situations such as Amber Alerts – which could be shown within minutes. Locating an unfair number of billboards in any section of town would not be acceptable to me.

Q XII: Many cities near the City of Tacoma such as Fife and University Place as well as unincorporated Pierce County do not have a B&O tax which many people allege has caused businesses to move out of the City of Tacoma.  Last year, the City of Tacoma raised the B&O threshold to $250,000.  Hence, businesses in Tacoma
grossing less than $250,000 pay no B&O tax.  If elected, would you support further raising the B&O tax threshold? If so, how far would you raise it?
.

Answer: The B&O Tax is fair, where it sits. There are costs associated with living in an area as beautiful as Tacoma. The costs must be shared by all of us, residents and business alike. For new business, waiving the B&O tax for the first year seems reasonable, and for small business waiving the B&O tax for two years should help them establish a customer base.     Comparing Tacoma to Fife or University Place is just not fair, as we have so much more to offer. Consider that no business ever really pays a tax. Only the buyer of the product or service pays a tax. The business increases the cost of the product to compensate for the tax, and the increase in cost makes the product less competitive in the marketplace. Taxes always create a black market, or underground market, as both producers and purchases look for ways to get around them. As a result, the city will always lose money by the imposition of new taxes. Look at the cigarette tax as a great example. People did not stop smoking, they just stopped buying from businesses in the city, and went to the tribes. The city and state have not earned a penny more from the increased taxes as they did before the hike. The effect was penalizing the profits of the business owners.

___________________

For more information, see Vote Michael Hardy on Facebook.

Tacoma City Council Candidate David Boe Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:

Below are the questions and responses sent to David Boe, candidate for Tacoma City Council District #7. This at-large district is current represented by councilmember Boe who is running to be “retained” in the district.
.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the best method to restore the Winthrop Hotel, removing harmful Parking Requirements in downtown Tacoma, rebuilding Tacoma Streetcars, and addressing the Felon Dumping Ground Issue.

.

Tacoma Sun Candidate Questionnaire
Candidate:  David Boe
Position:  Tacoma City Council – At-Large No. 7
.

Q I: What education and experience do you have to qualify you to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective councilmember?
.

Answer:  I guess the short answer is that since I was appointed to the Tacoma City Council in January 2010, the current City Council believes that I have the education and experience qualifications for this position.  Having been a member of the Tacoma Planning Commission the previous 5-years to the appointment (the last three-years as Vice-Chair), they recognized their need to have a member with expertise on land use issues.   I also bring my experience from serving on the Tacoma Arts Commission where I was appointed to be a member of the 1992 Cultural Plan Steering Committee.  A unique qualification that I have for this city-wide position is that my wife and I have lived in both the South End and North End of Tacoma – and as an architect I have worked on projects across every district in the city (so Boe Knows Tacoma).
.
My formal education started with completing an Associate of Arts Degree (Liberal Arts) at Normandale Community College, followed by a Bachelor of Arts in Architecture at Iowa State (Go Cyclones), and the equivalent of a Master of Architecture at the Architectural Association School of Architecture in London.  During my five years in London, I spent two-years as the Project Coordinator for the Canary Wharf Light-Railway Station .  Since 1996 I have had my own architectural practice in Downtown Tacoma – and I think the perspective of being a successful small-business owner is an important voice in the make-up of the City Council.
.
As for books that are appropriate to my brief tenure on the City Council, I think Cervantes’ ‘Don Quixote,’ Calvino’s ‘Invisible Cities, and ‘Surely You Must be Joking Mr. Feynman.
.
What many folks may not comprehend about a City Manager-led form of government is that individual council members must be able to work well with their peers on the dais – as it takes at least 5 votes to get anything accomplished.  Trained as an architect, I am ingrained with a collaborative spirit and working with my fellow council members has been the most gratifying aspect of this challenging, but rewarding, service to the citizens of Tacoma.  Having been married to the same woman for the past 29 years, I do understand the value of a good compromise on occasion.
.
Q II: Growth management
.
Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5,000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000.  If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
.
Answer:  Density, Density and more Density (thus the moniker ‘Density Dave’).  I was on the Planning Commission when the City Council passed the Mixed-use Center Zoning Ordinance in 2009 – but in my opinion these regulations did not go far enough to provide incentive for development – and cracking this issue open is one of the main reasons I have decided to run for a full term (that and an awareness that very few members of the past City Council(s) have had a deep understanding of urban design).  The first issue I brought to the table once on council, and with luck will be passed this year, is to go to a market base parking requirement for new construction in our urban centers and commercial zones.  Many of our zoning regulations are out-of-date and provide more barriers than incentives for new development.  I contend that the 6th Avenue Business District continues to flourish due to existing buildings being allowed to be renovated and/or converted without requiring city mandated additional off-street parking lots.
.
Another issue is Land Banking (of which the City of Tacoma is just a guilty as the private market).  We need to get development on these ‘vacant’ parcels in order to positively change the market for new development.  Right now you cannot actually lease new construction for what it costs to construct the project.  Think about it.  The cost of a new building is pretty much the same whether you build it in Tacoma or in Kirkland (not including the land that is) – but in Kirkland you can get mid-$20s to $30 per square foot whereas the market in Tacoma is closer to $12-15 per square foot.
.
So most of the development that happens in Tacoma is by individuals or companies that want to develop here (thinking with their heart more than their head in many cases) or they require significant government assistance (City, State or Federal) to make their projects pencil (e.g. UWT, museums et al, Elks).  There is no silver bullet to solve this ongoing conundrum, but we need as many development tools in the toolbox as possible AND look at every policy decision to see how it creates additional residential density in our urban centers.  For example, the route of the streetcar expansion, for me, should be the one that maximizes transit oriented development opportunities.

.
Oh, and we should not be building anymore surface parking lots in our urban centers – another change that needs to be incorporated into the zoning code (i.e. new stand alone surface parking lots should not be allowed or permitted as a primary use in our urban centers).
.
Q III: Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
.
Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It? http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf.
Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County?
.
Answer:  I had not read the Tacoma City Club Report until you referenced it here in this question, although I was a new member on the City of Tacoma Planning Commission in 2005 when the Special Needs Housing Moratorium was enacted due to the concerns about an overly high concentration of release facilities in the Hilltop.  In my opinion this report accurately portrays the situation.  Like other job growth policies that have been introduced into Tacoma over the years, it was sold as an ‘economic generator’ without looking at the possible unintended consequences of such a success (e.g. Immigration Detention Center in the Port of Tacoma).  So local leaders courted the Department of Corrections in the past, agencies and organizations were successfully set-up to meet the need, and very low cost of housing makes it economically more viable than other urban centers in the state (see Item No. 2 above).  I pledge to continue working at the local and state level for Tacoma and Pierce County to reduce the total number of work release offenders to our ‘fair share’ distribution with the rest of the state.
.
Q IV: Restoration of Winthrop Hotel
.
Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support, if any, to restore the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel? What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?
.
Answer:  I think the best way forward is to consider putting together a multi-faceted group of developers with a wide array of funding sources – and look at dividing the building interior into a number of distinct zones.  For instance, storefront retail could be managed by a commercial retail developer, the Crystal Ballroom possibly managed by the Broadway Center (which would give it another unique venue for performances), the lower floors of the tower for student housing related to UWT, and the top floors of the tower managed by an experienced hotelier.
.
All of this will require close coordination with an entity like the Tacoma Housing Authority to work through the HUD voucher program that the current residents are using for their accommodation – and possibly look to additional housing being added, or converted, in the area to meet the existing population need.  I also think we need to look at incorporating a Historic Tacoma Public Development Authority in order to address the cause of historic buildings that are facing critical challenges like the Winthrop (e.g. Old City Hall and the now lost Luzon Building).

.
Q V: Rebuilding Tacoma
.
Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer:  I voted a loud ‘NO’ on Sauro.  But as noted earlier, it takes 5, not three, to win the day.  In addition to what I presented in response to Question 2, we need to look at multiple development incentive options given the size of the task – and one of these is really about educating our County, State and Federal partners about the reality of funding huge road projects that in reality just make it cheaper to build sprawl out in the rural areas.  Yes we have GMA, but if we are investing billions in new roads to make it cheaper to build in Graham, why would someone invest in Tacoma?  We really need to shift the paradigm.
.
I don’t want to get all James Howard Kunstler on you, but until we hit $8 a gallon, we’ll need to look at every opportunity to provide incentives for development in our urban centers.  Providing transit options will be a huge selling point in my opinion.  Tacoma is blessed with a wide variety of neighborhoods and growing Business Districts that are literally 10 minute by car, 20 minute by bicycle from Downtown.  McKinley Hill/East Side, South Tacoma, Central Tacoma, Hilltop, Stadium, 6th Avenue, and North End – many with amazing affordable historic housing stock.  This is a huge asset when planning for a connected city with transit, bicycle avenues, and good roads, curbs, gutters and sidewalks.  The Broadway LID has been a great boost to development and I will work to get similar projects to grow out from the neighborhood mixed-use centers to connect the entire City.  I am very proud to have worked on the Mobility Master Plan and making quality streets for pedestrians, bicycles, and transit is far, far overdue for Tacoma.
.
Q VI: Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown
.
Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing the cost of housing, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer:  I guess I should have read all of the questions before writing my earlier comments.  So do I support removing the off-street parking in requirement in Downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s Mixed-use Centers?  That is an absolute YES!  And with support from constituents this coming year, we can take another step to update the City of Tacoma Zoning Ordinance that still has regulations mired in 1980’s thinking.
.

Q VII: Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars
.
Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?
.
Answer:  Yes.  As noted previously, for me the routes need to reference the historic streetcar routes – as anyone who bicycles in Tacoma can tell you, you need to always think like a streetcar when planning your route to minimize the uphill climbs.  But we also need to make sure that the route makes damn good urban design sense AND maximizes neighborhood property for transit-oriented development potential AND we need to get real about ridership.
.
I personally think the route selected for the initial LINK was an urban design disaster once it leaves Pacific Avenue (and for those of you that like to pick on Tollefson Plaza – it’s the train that creates the majority of the problem – it doesn’t stop, it dissects the space so that is has no ability to have the much needed active frame to an open public space) – and thus it is going to take creative and critical thinking to vision routes that are appropriate for Tacoma now and the future (the current route up Commerce was based on politics and not good urban design).
.
You want to make Downtown and our Mixed-use Centers attractive for development?  Well then we better figure out how we can have a quality of life without relying on the single-occupancy vehicle.  And we are also going to have to get creative about financing and operations given the recent Pierce Transit funding situation.  I am not saying it is as easy as running the Streetcar to the Mall and/or to the Casino – but it might include long-range planning of a route to the Mall and/or to the Casino.

.
Q VIII: Pollution Issues in Tacoma
.
Question: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?
.
Answer:  The South Tacoma Air Quality Non-Attainment is a significant environmental health issue that is going to require close collaboration between all of the Federal, State, County and City partners to create an equitable solution (and it is an issue that in many ways is fueled by the need for a population to have inexpensive ways to heat their homes).  There is no easy way to address this issue – but I believe that my creative and collaborative skills can be an asset in developing a successful resolution.  It also is going to take some hard looks at how we think about wood fireplaces and wood stoves.
.
While Air Quality is huge –we also need to look at storm water capacities and sanitary infiltration.  I will continue to work with my council colleagues to foster and coordinate regulations that hit many of the environmental concerns on multiple levels.  For instance, the Urban Forestry project can help to increase the natural storm water capacity provided by an increase tree canopy (and reduce heat gain from the built environment) while infrastructure projects incorporate Complete Streets and Low-Impact Development Standards to address storm water issues at their source.  Tacoma has made great strides in addressing many of the industrial polluters – and in many ways we do not celebrate the advancement that we have made – but we still need to be vigilant especially regarding protecting ground water quality.
.
Q IX: Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson
.
Question: A few years ago, City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached.  What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?
.
Answer:  We need to build on the great work already completed by the Community Policing Programs through the Police Sub-stations, great community programs like Safe Streets, and creating incentives/market for more quality affordable housing in our urban centers.  Tacoma needs to become a city of homeowners and not house renters.  Basically do you want live next door to a rental or another home owner?  Home ownership breeds strong community spirit – that and good curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street trees.
.
Q  X: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at:
http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards.  What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?
.
Answer:  I imagine I have read most if not all of them – and they have been very informative.  Well done to the CNC for leading the charge in response to this issue.
.
Q XI: What is your position in relation to the settlement proposal that the Tacoma City Council is considering regarding digital billboards?  Do you support it? If you were elected to the Tacoma City Council, would you authorize the City of Tacoma to expend financial resources to defend the Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard law?
.
Answer:  Well I did vote to proceed with the settlement precisely because it was going to require the Planning Commission to review the signage code and look into all the details of digital billboards.  Having served on the Planning Commission, and knowing the great individuals currently serving on the commission, I had complete trust in their abilities to delve into the details of the issue (something sadly we on Council are not afforded the luxury of time to allow us to typically get into the weeds).  I have been most impressed by the time and effort by the community in getting to the public hearings and submitting public comment and I have tried to make each of the Planning Commission public hearings to hear the testimony personally.
.
I have stated repeatedly that first we need to get our signage code right before we proceed to look at options for settlement or potential litigation action.  Our sign code needs to include design guidelines on the signage structure themselves in order to graphically illustrate non-conforming signs.  We also need to incorporate unequivocally clear language about the removal of non-conforming signs and have delineated a clear process for the removal of blighted signs (such as we have Code Enforcement for derelict buildings).  And for me, all non-conforming signs must come down before any new code compliant billboards are erected.
.
As for digital itself, I am not a fan of internally illuminated signs at all because they produce glare (i.e. you are seeing the light coming at you instead of reflected light off the surface of the sign).  If only indirect lighting is incorporated as a standard, I do not see how internally lit digital signs could be in compliance.
.
Q XII: Many cities near the City of Tacoma such as Fife and University Place as well as unincorporated Pierce County do not have a B&O tax which many people allege has caused businesses to move out of the City of Tacoma.  Last year, the City of Tacoma raised the B&O threshold to $250,000.  Hence, businesses in Tacoma grossing less than $250,000 pay no B&O tax.  If elected, would you support further raising the B&O tax threshold? If so, how far would you raise it?
.

Answer:  I am very proud to say that I voted a strong ‘Aye’ to the raising of the B+O threshold in my short tenure on the Council.  And yes, we need to look at ways to step-by-step remove this anti-business tax.  Having paid this tax as a small business owner, it amazes me that it is calculated on gross income.  Gross income!  I understand that this makes it simple to calculate the tax, but it totally penalizes businesses that are successful but net only a small amount of profit.  The reality is that B+O makes-up a significant amount of the City’s General Fund, so we are going to have to look at other ways to fund projects or at least look at a way of collecting a more equitable tax – and/or look at ways of funding projects and particular services outside of the General Fund.
.
Conclusion

.
It has been a privilege to serve on the City Council.
.
As a small business owner I have created jobs, maintained budgets and managed people.  As your elected City Council member I will continue to focus on job growth, controlling the line on expenses and holding the City accountable by asking tough questions.
.
I believe Tacoma is a beautiful city, but we have more work to do to improve the livability of our neighborhoods.  Through smart and responsible planning we can repair our streets and sidewalks, increase our transportation options and improve safety through-out Tacoma.
.
With your support I will continue to bring this vision forward.  I greatly appreciate your vote.

For those interested in learning more about my campaign check out http://www.voteboe.com and ‘friend’ my campaign on Face Book at ‘Vote Boe.’

To see some of my urban design thoughts for Downtown Tacoma, checkout my award winning ‘Imagine Tacoma’ blog on Exit133:  http://www.exit133.com/features/?c=Imagine_Tacoma
.
And for a little about this transition between full-time architect to full-time architect/part-time politician, check out this article from CityArts in March 2010:  http://www.cityartsonline.com/issues/tacoma/2010/03/drawing-inspiration-0 and
.
http://www.cityartsonline.com/issues/tacoma/2010/03/behind-scenes-march-tacoma-cover-shoot-david-boe
and
http://www.cityartsonline.com/issues/tacoma/2010/03/more-david-boe-interview

and Voter Pamphlet Information (page 28):  http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/xml/abtus/ourorg/aud/elections/archives/pri11/2011primaryweb.pdf

Tacoma City Council Candidate Joe Atkinson Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:
.

Below are the questions and responses sent to Realtor Joe Atkinson, candidate for Tacoma City Council District #1. This district is current represented by  councilmember Spiro Manthou who is retiring from the council.  Thus, this is an open position.

.

Atkinson is running against Karen Smitherman and Anders Ibsen.

.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issues.

Q I: What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective councilmember?
.
I graduated from Tacoma Community College and earned my bachelors degree in political science from the University of Washington Tacoma while working full time at a Tacoma small business.  I am no stranger to sacrifice and hard work.  I currently work as a legislative aide to State Representative (& former Mayor of Milton) Katrina Asay.  I am the elected Secretary of Ruston Point Defiance Business District (served for three years), am a licensed surety (bail) agent, and hold a real estate license.  My wife and I own two homes in Tacoma (one is 116 years old!) and a small business in Ruston. In the past I have worked as and aircraft fueler and member of the International Aerospace & Machinist Union. What stands out is my tireless work ethic and high level of practical, real world experience.
My wife and I are dedicated servants trying to make time for work, family, business, and community.  We are very hard workers, experts at budgeting, and are driven to empower our community and neighborhoods.  We are also dedicated parents who love spending our free time with our two-year-old son Alexander.
.
Through my wide range of experience I have built up a compassion for people, and enjoy helping others empower themselves to solve complex problems.  I have a clear vision, and a drive to enact positive change.  I am looking forward to growing this vision by listening to YOU and empowering our communities.
Please see my website at www.friendsofjoeatkinson.com, and feel free to ‘like’ and follow my facebook page Don’t Forget to ‘Like’ My Facebook Page! (Click This Link) if you would like to follow the happenings of our campaign.
The quintessential political book that comes to mind is the ancient 6th century Chinese work of Art; “Tao Te Ching”, a philosophical masterpiece themed on political guidance with limitless interpretations.  This book teaches humility, simplicity, and practicality, and should be read by all seeking any form of public office.  Another book that has touched my life is Booker T Washington’s “Up from Slavery”.  I personally relate to this book as a lesson of how far a person can come through hard work and ability in the face of great challenges.  I also love the philosophical works of Hobbes Locke & Rousseau, but especially love Hobbes’ “Leviathan” and Locke’s “Second Treatise of Government”.  My most recent book was Homer’s first epic “The Iliad” about the ancient Trojan Wars.
.
Q2: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
.
When considering the goals of the Growth Management Act, it is apparent that we are failing, and the proof is in the census numbers.  We must start with the basic premise that the underlying success of the Growth Management Act is dependant on making cities such as Tacoma a desirable (and affordable) place to live. Such Urban environments are best equipped to provide the infrastructure and services best needed to handle a large and diverse population base.  The more we can do as a city to encourage growth and affordable housing within our downtown core, the more competitive we will be.
Inside the City of Tacoma, such things as off-street parking requirements (and surface level lots and garages) have been a detriment to concentrated residential & business urban growth in the downtown core, which is the primary method of developing and revitalizing Tacoma without costing the city exorbitant amounts of capital.  Tacoma cannot achieve the levels of growth needed without high levels of quality, affordable housing right in our downtown core.  That must come first, before public transit, and before booming business.  It is unfortunate that the recent development boom has left us with expensive condos with high HOA dues, large empty parking lots, and empty units relatively isolated from downtown businesses and services.  I favor higher density, incentives to build taller, and a removal of off street parking requirements in certain density areas.  This would create more livable walkable communities in accordance with the GMA.  To address the long standing issue of poor Downtown Tacoma parking, we need to look towards multilevel underground parking alternatives rather than surface level lots.
Another detriment to downtown Tacoma is the lack of an accessible central park recreational area and working waterfront. Such a common area would promote an increase in pedestrian traffic, and fuel business development in the city.  An example to emulate is Ruston Way, which is detached from the downtown core, and too far away to have a direct impact on downtown.  Restaurants on Ruston Way are booming, and people flock to the area by the hundreds, or even thousands on nice days.  Facilitating such a park in our downtown core would create a much needed common space, and would be a much better investment than a between building parking lot.  Refurbishing the railroad track through UW Tacoma is a good idea, but the location is not ideal.  Having a park or communal shopping area in a more centralized location would create a real need for public transit, which is a primary goal of the Growth Management Act.  I am willing to hear all ideas. Tacoma has failed to expand the quality affordable downtown housing that attracts young investor, artists, and professionals.
In the future I would love to see the light rail expand to Point Ruston and even 6th Ave, but right now we don’t have the ridership to support such a large expenditure at the expense of crumbling sewers and roads.
.
3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
.
Q III: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It? http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf. Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County?
.
The disproportionate release of felons into our communities has been a long-term detriment to our neighborhoods and local economy.  I would support legislation that improves on the ‘fair share’ provision, meaning that we should ‘only’ take in offenders who resided in Pierce County when they committed their crimes.  It is not fair that we relocate offenders from other areas into Pierce County and Tacoma in particular.  Taking the burden from other counties (and cities) may have short term economic gains in DOC services, but the long term monetary and societal costs far outweigh any benefits.  This is an issue of safety and fairness, and is key to the revitalization of Downtown Tacoma where a high proportion of drug and sex offenders reside.
Finding a remedy to this issue is one of my top priorities.  I will work with Pierce County legislators relentlessly year after year until we improve on recent legislation, and move away from our current disposition.
I will also support programs that connect with our young people to break the cycle of crime right here at home, and support investing in after school activities that target teenagers.  We must address the underlying societal problems and work towards the future by investing in our future leaders BEFORE they fall through the cracks.  A little investment now will go a long way later in ensuring safe communities, productive citizens, and a healthy economy.
.
Restoration of Winthrop Hotel
.
Q IV:
A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support, if any, to restore the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel? What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?
I would love to see the Winthrop Hotel restored and converted back into to a hotel.  The benefit to our downtown economy would be substantial, and the need for hotel space in a key area would be partially alleviated.  However, I see no easy solutions to this ongoing issue and I’m afraid the poor economy will delay this dream for years.
Significant challenges are prominent, and it is unclear as to where the hundreds of low income residents would or could be relocated to.  That needs to be addressed first, though I am confident a fair solution can be found.
The biggest challenge is economic feasibility and the high cost of restoration in the midst of this terrible economic recession.  Lending practices are stringent, and money is not readily available.  It is important that city officials work with the owner to locate a reliable funding source to facilitate restoration, be it loans or grants.  My preference would be to work with our federal officials and representatives to locate and win federal funding in the future.  Currently this project serves as an anchor of unrealized potential.
I simply find the recession based delay unfortunate, and would love to see such a restoration underway sooner rather than later.  I am willing to listen to ideas, and will do all I can to work with stakeholders & get restoration underway as soon as possible.
.
Q V: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
The development of surface level parking lots Downtown Tacoma is antithetical to the goals of the Grown Management Act.  I will not support surface level parking lots in our downtown core period, which takes us a step backwards in our goals of dense development, public transportation, and a livable, walkable downtown core.  Rather than focusing on street level parking I would promote businesses at street level and encourage parking above or below.  I would also encourage high density development coupled with adequate underground parking.
In moving towards this direction we must look at positive examples and emulate cities such as Portland and learn from their lessons. Tacoma has great potential, and we need to research proven methods of sustainability and growth.  In the future this will involve saving historical monuments when possible and sadly clearing the way for development when restoration is not an economically feasible option.
I will stick to my point in saying that strong economic development cannot occur until we achieve a healthy level of growth and density coupled with safety and a high quality of life.  The primary way to move towards a dense downtown core is to promote affordable housing.  Affordable housing is just one aspect of desirability, where other factors include safety, image, and fair fees & taxes.  Affordable housing is also tied to affordable utilities as well as good businesses & services close by.  These factors are all key to smart development, of which the foundation of quality of life and environmental sustainability.  These are all long term goals than encompass multifaceted solutions, and while the council is on the right track on many issues, we can do much better.
Lastly, encouraging private development is the road to putting Tacoma on the right track.  I am willing to discuss priorities and thoughts on best how to do this so we avoid the mistakes of the past and retain quality employers that provide good jobs and benefits.  I would also LOVE to see the North Park Plaza Garage razed.
.
Q VI: Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, and San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing the cost of housing, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
In downtown, Yes.  Again, promoting surface level parking in urban areas is contrary to the goals and ideals behind the Growth Management Act, and harms the image and viability of our downtown core.  We need to take a hard look at the cities above and do what we can to promote business, affordable housing, and underground parking in our urban core.  This can be done through development incentives, and must be done in collaboration with all stakeholders including builders, labor groups, businesses, residents, environmentalists, and the city.  I am willing to listen to anyone with ideas on how to improve our city and spur sustainable development, and am interested in bringing us all together towards common goals and ideals.  The potential is right here!
In other mixed use areas, the city needs to work with communities and develop regulations that work best for each particular area. Tacoma is blessed with diversity, and Proctor may in fact have far different needs than Stadium or 6th Ave.  We need to give more power to communities to have a say in future development, and move further away from rigid rules that may inhibit local vision and ingenuity.
My vision is to attract private developers & jobs by promoting smart regulations that encourage sustainable development.  We have wasted our most recent opportunity, and must now look towards the future.
.
Q VII: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels? Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?
.
I am a huge proponent of modern public transportation systems, but density and development must come first in my opinion to facilitate a clear need.  I am willing to have this ‘chicken or egg’ discussion with anybody.  Without density we do not have the foundation to sustain the costs of these services.  To invest exorbitant amounts of capital in a street car system while our streets are crumbling is not a viable solution.  The only solution is to incorporate a streetcar assessment in with road repair and clearly assess costs by quickly developing a clear, transparent plan.  I have had many discussions on front porches about this issue.
The other alternative is to ask the people to pay more in taxes, but those same taxes may put us at a further disadvantage.  If a tax measure is brought before the people, it must be coupled with efficiencies, directly allocated, and non-permanent.  We cannot afford another mistake like that of the Pierce Transit Board, who through short-sighted leadership asked voters to raise the transit tax to the ceiling while seeking limited efficiencies.  They have failed bus riders across the county, and refuse to bring a more reasonable tax package back to the table.
.
Q VIII: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?
The best way to combat pollution is to utilize technology (such as electric cars and energy efficiency), promote urban growth, and allocate funds where they will have the greatest impact.  We live in an area of suburban sprawl where people are driving further to work and recreation.  If we cannot reverse this trend, our environmental goals will move farther out of reach.
We need to look past simple short-term costly measures and towards the future of long term sustainability.  Promoting urban growth will increase environmental challenges, but I am looking forward to that challenge with the understanding that dense urban areas are best equipped to handle large populations and growth. Urban sprawl is the prime underlying cause of our environmental regression, and by addressing the causes we can move in the direction of practical solutions that promote public transportation, shorter commutes, and other things that are related to the high quality of life our people expect and deserve.  I will constantly look to environment groups and other stakeholders to find common ideas to develop a long-term, practical, sustainable development plan.
Q IX: A few years ago, City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached. What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?
.
The city manager set a worthy, though simplistic goal.  Crime issues are much more deep rooted and complex, and will require long-term solutions that tackle the roots of drug activity and crime.  The only way a city can directly reduce crime in the short term is to hire more police to protect, arrest, and convict.  I am in favor of letting police do their job, and will focus my energy on future goals that promote healthy communities and combat crime at its source so our kids do not get caught up in the system.
One method is to foster community programs such as safe streets, neighborhood business districts, and neighborhood council districts.  By giving these active residents a good avenue to communicate with police, we are giving officers eyes and ears all over the city.
Long term solutions include investing in early intervention programs that help role models connect with students in need before they drop out of school, get on drugs, and wind up in jail.  When a young person is arrested, we have failed.  There is so much more we can do.  All it takes is community energy and ideas.
.
Q X: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at:http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards. What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?
.
I have combed through most all of those documents, and am particularly interested in the legal documents considering I have ambitions of obtaining my law degree in the future.  This is a very complex legal issue that may drag on for years to come.  I am currently looking through them very closely with a legal eye to the facts.  I still don’t feel like we the public have all the information.
.
Q XI: What is your position in relation to the settlement proposal that the Tacoma City Council is considering regarding electronic billboards? Do you support it? If you were elected to the Tacoma City Council, would you authorize the City of Tacoma to expend financial resources to defend the Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard law?
It is unfortunate that we are facing such a complex issue that threatens to cost the taxpayers huge amounts of capital in these tough economic times.  To me this resembles our crumbling street problem in the way it was neglected and pushed back for a future council to deal with.  The City Council in 1997 attempted to remedy the problem, but we still face the same issues today with no easy solutions.  It is unclear to me as to how much it will cost the city if Clear Channel was forced to remove blighted billboards and prevailed in suit, but my estimation puts that figure at around $30 million.  Again, I do not have all the information.
What is clear is that the city made two fundamental mistakes in mitigation.  First and most importantly, the people weren’t involved in any meaningful way at the beginning, which has come back as a major controversy.  Second, the initial settlement was heavily weighted in favor of Clear Channel, which I assume is the product of a weak negotiator. The signs to be removed were mostly in low traffic areas per my assessment.  What was needed is a fair & balanced settlement proposal to be considered by the people and the council together.  Possible mediation should include a drastic reduction in size, more stringent limits on residential & school area zoning placement, increases is static shift time (I would prefer 60 seconds), swifter and more certain removal of existing billboards, and a stipulation that the city should only be responsible for sign value reimbursement (not future loss of revenue) should a sign be removed in the future for any reason.  The settlement was not thoughtfully considered, and not in the best interest of the city and the people.
A better settlement should have been proposed to the people from the start, and public input should have been considered by the council before adoption.  The process should have been more open and transparent from the beginning. Now we have wasted time and are back to square one with increased opposition and public mistrust.  The people have lost faith in the ability of our government, which will take time and energy to rebuild.
I will defend the will of the people above all else, but the people must know all the facts.  It is imperative that the city fight to get the most favorable settlement, and bring all the facts plainly before our residents, including litigation cost options.  What I would like to see are cost estimations for all scenarios, so we, the people, can make an informed decision on how best to move forward.
.
Q XII: Many cities near the City of Tacoma such as Fife and University Place as well as unincorporated Pierce County do not have a B&O tax which many people allege has caused businesses to move out of the City of Tacoma. Last year, the City of Tacoma raised the B&O threshold to $250,000. Hence, businesses in Tacoma grossing less than $250,000 pay no B&O tax. If elected, would you support further raising the B&O tax threshold as a number of current councilmember’s have suggested? If so, how far would you raise it?
.
Our city & state B&O tax punishes employers that hire in our community, and is fundamentally inequitable.  Business with high expenditures (including costs of paying employees) often pay an unfair share of taxes, and in some cases businesses that do not make a profit can be stuck with a high B&O tax bill.  We need to be competitive and are moving in the right direction by raising the threshold, but fundamentally we need to work with the city and state to develop a more fair and equitable business tax structure.  A starting point would be an exemption for hiring local workers.  I am willing to discuss the feasibility and implication of such a shift.
The increase in threshold to $250K will save the businesses just over 2 million dollars in the next two years, which is not nearly enough to help businesses in Tacoma as they struggle through tough economic times.  Larger companies see little benefit in the increased threshold and in many cases are and have been incentivised to move out of Tacoma permanently.
We need to have a serious discussion on competitiveness and tax revenue, and work on a more stable funding measure to address our crumbling infrastructure.  Losing businesses hurts our bottom line, drives jobs to adjoining cities, and adversely affects our image long-term.
We also keep hearing that we are competitive to Bellevue, but as stated in the above question, the areas adjacent to Tacoma are offering better deals to attract our businesses right across our city borders.  We need to have a serious discussion before more businesses, jobs, and revenues leave the City of Destiny for good.
.
Conclusion:
.
Thank you for taking the time to read my take on these important and complex issues.  It is imperative that we foster an open dialogue as we move forward on realizing a common vision to capture the great potential of Tacoma.  If successful, I will work tirelessly to move the city forward and enact positive change.  I believe strongly in open, transparent government that communicates, listens, and acts with the will of the people in mind.  I will work hard to empower and invest in neighborhood groups to help us find the best path forward.  I will be a strong advocate and resource for the West End Neighborhoods by focusing on West End issues, and working to address our crumbling infrastructure by developing a transparent, comprehensive plan so the people can understand the extent of the neglect and consider alternate solutions.  And above all else, I appreciate this opportunity to serve you.  It would be an honor to earn your trust in these tough times.
There are many other issues that directly affect Tacoma & the West End, and I would be happy to discuss any of these issues with you any time.  Open communication is the foundation of our democratic way of life.

_____________________

Tacoma City Council Candidate Karen Smitherman Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

.

Introduction:
.

Below are the questions and responses sent to Karen Smitherman, candidate for Tacoma City Council District #1. This district is current represented by  councilmember Spiro Manthou who is retiring from the council.  Thus, this is an open position.
.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issue
.
Q I:
What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective councilmember?

Answer: Tacoma’s West End has been my home for more than 37 years. My husband, Bill and I raised our two daughters here where they attended Pt. Defiance Elementary School, Truman Middle School and Wilson High School. I’ve always been very active in serving our community whether it’s been as a member of our local PTA, the Pt. Defiance Zoo Society, the Tacoma Art Museum, Tacoma Urban Network, or the Pierce County Juvenile Justice Coalition. I will focus on creating local jobs, improving public safety, promoting transparency in government, providing better transportation mobility, and protecting our environment.
.
As a teacher and administrator for Tacoma Public Schools for 35 years, I’ve brought together business, labor, postsecondary institutions, organizations and agencies to solve problems and find solutions facing our children, youth and families throughout Tacoma. I received my undergraduate degree from the University of Washington in Sociology and Education and my Master’s degree from Pacific Lutheran University in Educational Administration and Principal Credentials. Where we are as a community requires a community conversation and collaborative approach to find solutions. How we define a problem will determine how we respond to it.
.
We need to have a conversation to define the benchmarks for success, accountability, and transparency. Through this crucial conversation we can lay the foundation to restore faith in government. We change the dynamics of the conversation by listening and defining together what we will fund, rather than what we will cut. It is only through this framework of benchmarks that citizens have a right to know and accountability with clear, well-defined objectives and timelines that we can hold each other accountable and avoid the blame game that can end up costing taxpayers millions of dollars. Please visit my webpage at http://www.karensmitherman.com to find out more about my vision for Tacoma.
.
The last three months, as part of the Community Awareness for Student Achievement Project, I’ve enjoyed facilitating a community book study focusing on the impact of poverty and race on student learning. A group of concerned citizens came together to read and have a conversation about how we can close the achievement gap. “Whatever It takes” by Paul Tough describes how Geoffrey Canada worked to establish the “Harlem Children’s Zone.” Our discussions on solutions to close the achievement gap begin the crucial conversation of how to ensure that all students succeed.
.
Growth Management
.
Q2:
Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
.
Answer: It was 20 years and 1.9 million people ago (in total population) that Washington enacted the Growth Management Act. The idea in 1990 was to divert people into places that could accommodate their number while preserving open space, critical habitats, shorelines and farmlands. The Growth Management Act was supported t put the brakes suburban sprawl and channel growth into existing cities. However, all we have to do is drive around Pierce County and question if the GMA really is producing the results it was intended to make. South Hill, Yelm Fredrickson and DuPont are all situated on the fringe of urban growth areas and have seen far greater growth than expected. The Puget Sound Regional Council adopted VISION 2040 in April 2008. According to their documents, VISION 2040 establishes a common vision for the future.

.
It consists of: an environmental framework; a regional growth strategy; policies to guide growth and development; actions to implement; and measure to track programs. I believe that all levels of government in the central Puget Sound’s four counties (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish) will use VISION 2040 as a regional framework for making local decision.  Within the metropolitan and core cities like Tacoma, VISION 2040 supports concentrating population and employment growth in regionally designated growth centers. These centers serve as hubs for regional transportation, public services and amenities.

.

With the shape of how the South Sound developed in the last 10 years, you have to question whether the GMA really is producing the intended results. As a city we must have a vision and the leadership to move Tacoma forward and the definitely means that we must have an action plan that will increase density in Tacoma. The Executive Council of Tacoma, along with City and Community leaders must come together and develop a strong vision that addresses the reality of where we want to go in these very difficult economic times.
.
3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
.

Q III:
As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It? http://cityclubtacoma.org/images/uploads/DOC_Report_final1.pdf. Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being place in Tacoma and Pierce County?
.

Answer: According to the City Club report released in February 2007, ”work release was originally conceived as a program of rehabilitation for offenders and a cost-effective alternative to incarceration, which provided important pre-release benefits to convicted felons.
.
Over time, Pierce County’s level of participation in the program exceeded that of most other counties within the state, leading to higher rates of post-incarceration placement within the county. In addition, offenders from other counties serving time in Pierce County correctional institutions remained in Pierce County for community custody supervision by DOC. High numbers of post-incarceration offenders residing in the county result in higher crime and other negative costs.” Our own State Legislators Jeannie Darneille, Steve Conway and Steve Kirby introduced House Bill 1733 which obtains equitable distribution of work release centers and released felons around the state. This “fair-sharing” burden must be continually re-evaluated so that Tacoma and Pierce County only receives its fair share and has the commitment that DOC has the ability to supervise those who are released into our county. The Joyce family lost Paula when a convicted felon on “pre-release” and supposedly “under supervision” smashed his car into hers. This cannot happen to another family. The system must be “designed to achieve the results it achieves.”

.
Restoration of Winthrop Hotel
.
Q IV:
A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support, if any, to restore the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel? What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?
.

Answer: The historic Winthrop Hotel is an architectural anchor of the north end of downtown Tacoma and its redevelopment has been identified as a priority by all three Tacoma Partnership teams lead by Tom Luce and Bruce Kendall(report to the City of Tacoma Economic Development Committee, August 31, 2010)  They stated in their report that the hotel currently houses 170 units of subsidized affordable housing, requires significant rehabilitative investment to reverse decades of neglect and is perceived by some community stakeholders to be the source of crime and other undesirable activity in this area of downtown.
.
Redevelopment of the Winthrop Hotel and the adjacent streetscape will breathe new life into the Theater District, creating a new destination for visitors and incite further reinvestment in the north end of downtown. Relocation of the tenants will give them an opportunity to live in buildings that were designed for long-term residents; an improvement over their current situation.
.
Redevelopment of the Winthrop Hotel requires three steps. (1) Address the affordable housing needs of the current residents, relocating them into more modern and appropriate housing. (2) Identify developers and a plan for redevelopment. (3) Identify financing for the redevelopment.
.
Discussions with key constituencies and the City of Tacoma must continue so that a specific plan of action can be moved forward.
.
Rebuilding Tacoma
.

Q V:
Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

.
Answer: Each year the Economic Development Board meets with more than 100 existing primary firms in Tacoma to address their workforce, financing, site, and regulatory needs. They also recruit new firms into Tacoma and VersaCold is a recent example. Primary firms make a product or service and export it out of the market, thereby bringing new dollars in and creating new jobs for our economy. As a member of the Tacoma City Council, I will be working with the EDB, Tacoma’s Executive Council and local Business Districts to implement high level corporate visits (recruitment trips); more deeply leverage broker relationships, as well as, partner with building owners and developers to market the area. The work of the EDB can be enhanced with the participation of the Tacoma City Council members and other public leaders. The work of the Tacoma Partnership Team, the Economic Development board and the City of Tacoma should continue this collaboration in identifying top economic development project priorities for downtown.
.
Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown
.

Q VI:
Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, and San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing the cost of housing, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.

Answer: Yes. By reducing the off-street parking requirements, the City of Tacoma would promote higher density in our downtown core and pedestrian friendly mixed-use centers. It would also encourage alternate transportation such as streetcars, busses, light rail and bicycles. Continued collaboration between the City of Tacoma, Pierce Transit and Sound Transit will make the reduction of off-street parking sustainable and will encourage more density in our downtown core while developing “walkable” neighborhoods. Removing the off-street parking requirement will help Tacoma move away from strip-mall development and become the livable community that we all want.
.
Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars
.

Q VII:
Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels? Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

.
Answer: I strongly support the development of a streetcar system. The first step is to develop a plan where the streetcars will run; then highlight the most cost effective routes to neighborhood business district, parks and the downtown core. Secondly, there needs to be enough public support and input. This can be done through our Neighborhood Councils, Rotary meetings and other community connections.
.
Pollution Issues in Tacoma
.

Q VIII: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?

.
Answer: The Office of Sustainability, in partnership with the Sustainable Tacoma Commission, has been monitoring greenhouse gas reductions and sustainability efforts made by the City of Tacoma and the community. We all must become stewards of our environment. As a teacher in Tacoma, I’ve taken my 5th graders to the Tacoma Nature Center where they learned about wetlands and community conservations efforts. Our science teacher, Mr. Menke, has been working with our students to teach them about recycling, composting and establishing their own urban garden at Stanley Elementary School. As a steward of my community, I am working to change my own carbon footprint by reducing, reusing and recycling.

.
I strongly support Tacoma’s Climate Action Plan. “Tacoma’s Climate Action Plan clearly lays out what we can do together to ensure a healthier more livable environment for our children and grandchildren. The City must invest in and build upon its current infrastructure. As the region grows in the coming decades, expanding populations should be absorbed in areas where infrastructure already exists, rather than duplicating municipal services. This is not only a wiser use of tax dollars, but also brings the critical mass together to afford the amenities communities desire to be more livable, such as transportation options, better streets and sidewalks for all types of mobility, shopping and entertainment options.

.

Land use planning must drive investment in the downtown core and existing multiple-use centers. Livable, walkable, compact cities are vital to curbing climate change because it fundamentally reduces driving distances for our most common activities, such as going to work, shopping and entertaining our families.”(Green Ribbon Task Force Co-chairs Ryan Mello and Joanne Buselmeier). Please visit the City of Tacoma’s website to learn more about what we can do together to provide a healthier, more sustainable Tacoma for everyone. http://www.cityoftacoma.org
.
Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson
.

Q IX: A few years ago, City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached. What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?
.

Answer: The original challenge set by the City Manager was to reduce blight and crime and make our community safe and clean. The Safe and Clean Initiative began in 2008, it brought together city employees and neighborhood citizens to mobilize around projects that they identified were their top priorities. They identified drug and gang houses and boarded up houses for code violations. The city amended codes to make it easier to force landlords and businesses to clean up their properties. Some of the surplus properties were identified and turned into community gardens. Neighbors are educated on how to improve their home landscape to ensure safety. The Tacoma Police Department worked on targeting car prowls, vehicle theft and junk autos. Together, neighbors working with neighbors. Safe and Clean target crimes dropped 20 percent from 2007 to 2010. Neighborhood cleanups have packed off more than 1,000 tons of debris. Allyson Griffith of Community Based Services is impressed with inspector’s new ability to send postcard warnings from their cars with about 70 percent of recipients fixing problems before they hit the expensive formal system. (Kathleen Merryman,TNT).

.

The Safe and Clean Initiative encourages neighbors to talk with one another, report crime and blight, join a community group such as your local Neighborhood Council, make your own home safe and clean. You can learn more about City services from their website at http://www.cityoftacoma.org.  In order to prevent crime and keep our community safe, all key municipal entities must play a role in cutting crime and violence. Schools, businesses, city government and social services must all work together. Leadership; working together; identifying problems and then attacking them; measuring results; doing business differently; being tough on crime and equally tough on the causes of crime produce positive results.
.
Tacoma’s Billboard Ordinances.
.

Q X: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at: http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards. What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?

Answer: After listening to members of the North end Neighborhood Council discuss the issue of electronic billboards; I decided to attend the community meeting March 12th at the Evergreen State College Tacoma campus. I then spent time reading various articles posted by the Central Neighborhood Council and read through oral and written statements made by citizens at the Planning Commission meeting March 16th.  I also listened to remarks of City Counsel Shelley Kerslake and the Planning Commission’s meeting on April 6th.
.
Q XI: What is your position in relation to the settlement proposal that the Tacoma City Council is considering regarding electronic billboards? Do you support it? If you were elected to the Tacoma City Council, would you authorize the City of Tacoma to expend financial resources to defend the Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard law?

.
Answer: Although there are a few people who support electronic billboards and a few non-profits who have received funding from Clear Channel to post advertisements on their billboards who appreciate Clear Channel’s civic involvement, 95% of those citizens who testified are strongly opposed to the Proposed Settlement Agreement (PSA) with Clear Channel. Currently, the Planning Commission is review those comments and will be making recommendations to the Tacoma City Council. Clear Channel plans to build ten jumbo digital billboards, I believe, the code is in direct conflict with the existing Comprehensive Plan land use policies for mixed-use districts.

.
The City of Tacoma agreed to accept as many as 38 digital electronic billboards in exchange for Clear Channel removing 253 existing traditional and mostly smaller billboards scattered around the city. The message is clear. No digital billboards. I clearly understand the financial implications fighting a major corporation like Clear Channel. Clear Channel is the big guy and the city is the little guy. The fight could cost the city millions of dollars. The City Council needs to stand up and defend Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard laws.
.
Tacoma’s B&O Tax

.

Q XII: Many cities near the City of Tacoma such as Fife and University Place as well as unincorporated Pierce County do not have a B&O tax which many people allege has caused businesses to move out of the City of Tacoma. Last year, the City of Tacoma raised the B&O threshold to $250,000. Hence, businesses in Tacoma grossing less than $250,000 pay no B&O tax. If elected, would you support further raising the B&O tax threshold as a number of current councilmember’s have suggested? If so, how far would you raise it?
.
Answer: The move to raise the annual taxable gross income threshold for small-business owners from $75,000 to $250,000 will benefit approximately 4,900 business owners who fall below that threshold. However, the loss of revenue is projected to be $2.8 million during the 2011-2012 biennium. It now becomes a matter of what do we want to fund. The City collected approximately $40 million in 2009. The revenue reduction makes Tacoma’s B&O tax threshold more appealing than thresholds in Seattle ($80,000), Olympia ($20,000) and Bellevue ($125,000).
.
The B&O tax is used to pay for a variety of services such as street repairs, libraries, and emergency services such as police departments and fire departments. To eliminate completely would mean a loss of $80 million into the biennium, general fund. This means less services, less police and fire protection. Raising the B&O threshold makes good business sense in these difficult economic times. It’s a bold step and demonstrates that Tacoma is a great place to do business and a great place to start a business.  I would support a raise in the B&O threshold only if we make the change revenue neutral by streamlining services and identifying other potential revenue sources.
.
________________
.

For more information see Karen Smitherman Facebook Page

City Council Candidate Anders Ibsen Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:

Below are the questions and responses sent to Anders Ibsen, candidate for Tacoma City Council District #1. This district is current represented by  councilmember Spiro Manthou who is retiring from the council.  Thus, this is an open position.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issue

.

Q I: What education and experience do you have to qualify to be a member of the Tacoma City Council? What books have you read that you believe that would give you insights as to how to be an effective council member?

Answer: I am a lifelong Tacoman with a direct stake in my neighborhood’s success. Through my work on the North End Neighborhood Council, Pierce Conservation District, and my service as a Safe Streets neighborhood watch organizer, I developed an intimate awareness of my district’s needs, and forged strong connections with civic leaders, business organizations and law enforcement officials. I look forward to bringing that same level of energy and civic dedication to City Hall as District 1’s elected representative.
.
My education is similarly rooted in our community. I attended St. Patrick’s School, Truman Middle School, Stadium High School, and graduated in the first-ever class of the Tacoma School of the Arts. I achieved my Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Sociology from the Evergreen State College.
.
To find out more about my professional background, accomplishments, and vision for Tacoma, feel free to visit my website at http://www.andersibsen.com
Some of my favorite books that have influenced my public service career include “Politics” and “Rhetoric” by Aristotle, “The Worldly Philosophers” by Robert Heilbroner, and “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” by Paulo Freire.
.
2) Growth management
.
Q II: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. During the last 10 years, Tacoma has grown less than 5000 residents while Spokane grew by 13,000 and Pierce County grew by 95,000. If you are elected, would you work to add more density to the City of Tacoma? How would your plan, if any, be different from what is in place now?
.
Answer: Sprawl is a complex trend with multiple causes. Suburbanization results from most well-paying jobs being in urban centers, while urban centers are progressively becoming more expensive to live in; the development of a transportation infrastructure exclusively devoted to the single-occupancy vehicle; and the commuter culture that results from both of these developments.
.
Our solutions must be equally multi-faceted. We need to invest heavily in our mixed-use centers and downtown core, to both provide an excellent quality of life for the people who live and work in our city, as well as meaningful transportation options for Tacoma residents. In addition, we need to address the economic aspect to the problem of sprawl, namely by growing more living-wage jobs for Tacomans, and embracing a balanced approach to housing that encourages Tacomans of all income levels to choose to live in the same neighborhoods together.
.
Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues
.
Q III: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?. Have you read this report? What specific steps would you take, if any, to reduce the number of felons being placed in Tacoma and Pierce County?

Answer: Yes, I generally support the City’s Club’s recommendations. We must continue working with state stakeholders to ensure a “fair share” of released offenders across the state, and continue to use zoning to ensure that offenders are not disproportionately concentrated in certain areas of our community.
.
Restoration of Winthrop Hotel
.
Q IV: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support, if any, to restore the Winthop Hotel back into a hotel? What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?
.
Answer: Our city, like many others, has learned the hard way that high-rise, low-income developments are a poorly planned hazard to the community – and to their tenants. The Winthrop is gorgeously constructed, and would make a wonderful hotel again. I support taking long-term steps to revitalize the Winthrop, provided we can ensure that 100% of its tenants find affordable housing in the community. Our prosperity should not come at the expense of our most vulnerable citizens.
.
5) Rebuilding Tacoma
.
Q V: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. In fact at least two new surface level parking lots have been created downtown in the last couple of years (the Sauro site and the site where the Luzon building was). What role can you and the City of Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer: Making our urban core and mixed-use centers open for business means providing quality infrastructure and public services that will make them attractive to investors. Business owners will not decide to move into an area unless they feel the surrounding area is safe, clean and accessible. Removing burdensome and outmoded regulations like the off-street parking requirement for downtown is equally desirable.
.
Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown
.
Q VI: Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing the cost of housing, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?
.
Answer: Yes, absolutely. Off-street parking requirements are a destructive anachronism that contributes to sprawl, and limit the growth of livable urban communities.
I support an immediate removal for the downtown, and a pragmatic, case-by-case removal for our neighborhood districts that takes local concerns and conditions into account.
.
Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars
.
Q VII: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?
.
Answer: I definitely support the expansion of our streetcar system into our neighborhoods and mixed-use districts. In particular, I support expanding the Link through the 6th Ave District and connecting it with the TCC transit center.
This will be a significant capital investment upfront, but the long-term dividends will eclipse the short-term costs, and I think the voters will come to the same conclusion if the city requires their support. If the funding comes to a ballot measure, I will be an eager and vocal supporter of it.
.
Pollution Issues in Tacoma
.
Q VIII: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. If elected, what specific measures would you take, if any, to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?
.
Answer: When it comes to ensuring a clean, healthy environment for Tacoma, I believe our biggest challenge is simply implementing and expanding on the progressive policies we already have.
.
In 2008, our Climate Action Plan identified three areas of emphasis for combating climate change and ensuring a healthier environment for all Tacomans: offering transportation alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles; finding new ways of conserving energy through our infrastructure and day-to-day activities; and encouraging the development of dense, walkable and livable neighborhoods.
.
We have begun to address these priorities through policies like the establishment of the Office of Sustainability, the Mobility Master Plan, and the increased height limit in mixed-use centers. Implementing and refining policies like these should be strong priorities in order for our city to meet the state’s standards.
.
When it comes to new policy, areas for improvement should definitely include a removal of the off-street parking requirement for our downtown core and our mixed-use centers. I also support the creation of a municipal Transfer of Development Rights program to further encourage density. Finally, I am highly interested in exploring the possibility
of a retrofitting program to help homeowners and businesses conserve energy in a cost-effective way.
.
Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson
.
Q IX: A few years ago, City Manager Eric Anderson set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Unfortunately, the goal was not reached. What can be done in your opinion to reduce crime in Tacoma?
.
Answer: I subscribe to the “Broken Windows” school of thought on public safety, which stipulates that crime is merely a byproduct of social disorder. In other words, crime doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Deeper environmental factors like unemployment and blight negatively impact social norms, which makes criminal behavior more likely.
.
A successful public safety strategy has three components: prevention, intervention and suppression. Prevention simply means addressing the root causes of social disorder by providing more decent-paying jobs, cleaning up our neighborhoods, and in general providing a decent quality of life for every citizen. Intervention means reaching out to at-risk individuals (particularly children) to offer constructive alternatives to crime. And suppression means working with law enforcement to apprehend offenders and secure our neighborhoods. A balanced approach that takes all three factors into account is key.
.
In many respects, Safe and Clean has laid a solid foundation for future work, even if its initial efforts fell short. I am a big admirer of the Community Based Services program (a streamlined delivery of city services like police protection and code enforcement based on local input), and believe in expanding it to every neighborhood in our city.
.
Q X: Tacoma’s Central Neighborhood Council has posted dozens of articles on the electronic billboard issue located at : http://cnc-tacoma.com/proposed-electronic-billboards. What percentage of these articles do you estimate that you have read?
.
Answer: I have read easily more than half. I applaud citizen leaders like Doug Schafer and R.R. Anderson for their advocacy on this crucial issue, and for investing so much time and energy into educating the public.
.
Q XI: What is your position in relation to the settlement proposal that the Tacoma City Council is considering regarding electronic billboards? Do you support it? If you were elected to the Tacoma City Council, would you authorize the City of Tacoma to expend financial resources to defend the Tacoma’s current 1997 billboard law?
.
Answer: As an executive board member of the North End Neighborhood Council, I voted with my colleagues last March to oppose the current settlement decision. I am disappointed that the city did not choose to defend a clearly constitutional law against Clear Channel’s baseless accusations. If elected, I would support a full legal defense of our 1997 billboard law.
.
Q XII: Many cities near the City of Tacoma such as Fife and University Place as well as unincorporated Pierce County do not have a B&O tax which many people allege has caused businesses to move out of the City of Tacoma. Last year, the City of Tacoma raised the B&O threshold to $250,000. Hence, businesses in Tacoma grossing less than $250,000 pay no B&O tax. If elected, would you support further raising the B&O tax threshold as a number of current council members have suggested? If so, how far would you raise it?
.
Answer: I think the city is moving in the right direction on the B&O tax. Because it applies to gross earnings, the B&O tax can be very regressive, as businesses can still technically owe the tax even if they are losing money.
.
That said, a narrow emphasis on tax breaks as an economic development strategy can be problematic. For one thing, there is no guarantee that the savings produced from a tax break will be spent on hiring new workers, spent in the city limits, or even spent at all. For another, less revenue means less services. That means less street repair, police protection and code enforcement for neighborhoods struggling to attract investment, for example.
.
We need to adopt a pragmatic tax policy that can successfully balance our immediate needs with our long-term priorities as a city. While I am not opposed to raising the B&O threshold further, I would only support moving further in that direction if the changes were revenue-neutral, would not impact the delivery of city services, and could be connected to a measurable economic benefit.
.
_______________________
.
For more information see Anders Ibsen Facebook Page

Mayoral Candidate Jim Merritt Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:

Below are the questions and responses sent  Jim Merritt, candidate for Mayor of Tacoma.

The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issue

1) Jail releases

Question: The media has reported that the Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma even if they are arrested in Orting or a remote area of the county. Would you support a plan which would transport some or all of the jail releases to the places where they were arrested or where they live when their sentence ends?

Answer:

Yes, I feel it is reasonable to transport people back to where they were arrested or where they lived prior to their arrest. It is not acceptable for Tacoma to be the only area in the State of Washington where new releases are placed in this manner. We must push for better control of this situation.

2) Growth management

Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma. If you are elected, how will you address the effects of sprawl and growth management in Pierce County? How would that plan be different, if at all, from what is in place now?

Answer:

I am against suburban sprawl with all of its ramifications. I believe in promoting dense growth in the urban centers. I have rejected working on projects that contribute to urban sprawl in my architectural practice. A reasonable and basically open discussion of the early stages of the planning and permitting process is important. The idea is a matter of the community needing to be well aware of the impact of proposed projects. This does not need to be laborious and onerous to identify issues to consider. The community can be helpful to work toward endorsed solutions at this early stage. The developer/investor will know the criteria for the project. It should be easy to explain in a two page document about an upcoming project which would benefit the community. We need to understand the impacts of large-scale developments before a project is committed but at the same time move the project along to provide family wage jobs in a timely manner. This is part of being a “customer friendly” city to encourage significant job growth.

3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues

Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?

Answer:

No, it has not been worth it. Tacoma and Pierce County has suffered a high crime rate because it has been used as a dumping ground in the past. I continue to get reports that this practice still is occurring.

If elected, what do you plan to do, if anything to reduce the number of felons placed in Tacoma and Pierce County? Do you agree that Tacoma and Pierce County should have no more than their pro-rata share based on population? How can the concentration of felons be reduced to its pro-rata share?

Tacoma and Pierce County should have no more than its pro-rata share based on population. As Mayor of Tacoma I will work closely with the Tacoma-Pierce County Sheriff Department and Pierce County Courts in creating a solid and plan for released felons. This plan will include placing felons back in the cities or states where they lived prior to their sentence.
4) Restoration of Winthrop Hotel

Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel Elks Temple restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel. What is your position on this issue? What plan would you support?
What ideas do you have to make this goal of Tacomans a reality?

Answer:

Yes, I support the restoration of the Winthrop Hotel and the Elks Temple. As an architect I have a solid understanding and experience in preserving many Tacoma buildings such as: Washington State Historical Society Museum; Tacoma Union Station; Carlton Center; Jefferson Square; Colonial Square and the Tacoma Rialto Theatre, just to name a few. I have given presentations to several business and civic groups in Tacoma, with detailed plans for restoring the Elks Temple and have met with business entrepreneurs in offering ideas for restoring the Elks temple. I will proactively work to see that both of these projects are completed with positive results. We must get these two projects done. The Elks appears to have a winning formula which I support and I have ideas to move the Winthrop forward and relocate the subsidized housing.

5) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities. What role can you and Pierce County take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

As an architect, I have led many projects that have helped to revitalize Tacoma’s downtown and its neighborhoods. I worked to restore Union Station into the beautiful federal courthouse it is today. I collaborated with the UW Tacoma to convert the Pinkerton building into the Institute of Technology. Historic structures should be seen as assets, not a liability. Just look at what happened to the Luzon building. That whole block used to be lined with historic buildings and now sits under-utilized as a parking lot. As mayor, I will continue to find creative, new uses for blighted areas. I fully support the Focus also on the mixed use centers with a comprehensive master plan approach that really includes the citizens in each neighborhood involved in the planning.


6) Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown

Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand. This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods. Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

I support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers. Tacoma needs to move away from strip-mall style development and become more pedestrian friendly. The emphasis also must include a comprehensive transportation system (ie street cars, etc.) to make the auto less necessary.

7) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars

Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system. Gas prices are now at record levels. Pierce County plays a large role in transportation systems in Tacoma. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma? What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

Answer:

Yes, I support a Tacoma streetcar system. The steps needed to make this happen are:

1)Design and develop where the streetcars would travel through Tacoma highlighting the most effective routes, business districts; neighborhood areas, etc.

2)Host a series of Town Hall meetings to inform and gain public input

3)Develop a plan which will tie the dense zones (ie mixed use centers)

VIII) Pollution Issues in Tacoma

Question: The City of Tacoma is currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. What role can Pierce County play to reduce pollution in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer:

Tacoma and Pierce County can work closely by implementing these three plans:

1) Develop a full network of bike pathways through the City to reduce auto use.

2) Work for a concentrated tree planting program throughout the city to include a “reforestation” of the tideflats (with significant edge plantings of significant scale to make a difference.)

3) Collaborate with all the neighborhoods of the City to develop an effective and well received plan developed through a grassroots approach to define appropriate mixed use urban living and working centers throughout our city. My strategies are to work with the neighborhoods and all interest groups to define a future that would embrace the needs for living and working in a quality “green” built environment.

9) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson

Question: City Manager Eric Anderson has set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. Given the predominant role Pierce County plays on the criminal justice system, what steps will you support the County government in taking so that the City of Tacoma can succeed?

Answer:

In addition to working with the Tacoma-Pierce County Sheriff’s Department and Pierce County Courts to return released felons to the counties where they were arrested and to improve the tracking of felons released here, I will encourage the County and City government to increase job training, local job creation, and other educational opportunities. I support the County and City in working with neighborhoods and local non-profit organizations to assist in the fulfillment of basic needs of families. The County should also emulate the programs of other Cities that have successfully reduced their crime rate.

My approach as an architect will be to gather information from other locales to implement effective remedies. We need to include the private sector in the City’s initiative.

Election 2009 Tacoma Mayoral/City Council Transportation and Land-Use Forum

The Puget Sound Regional Council predicts that the City of Tacoma is expected to grow by 127,000 people in the next 30 years. Earlier this year the City proactively planned for this growth by passing the Mixed-Use Centers update, fulfilling this vision of creating vibrant mixed use centers is an exciting opportunity with many challenges.

 

What will Tacoma ’s Transportation system look like in 20 years? Will our streetscape be dotted with streetcars, bike lanes, and working sidewalking next to walkable mixed-use communities? How will we manage our growth in a way that creates vibrant neighborhoods and urban centers? What transportation infrastructure and policies will be needed to keep our city moving and encourage smart development? What is the role of parking policy in the discussion? How will we pay for the transportation and land-use challenges that lie ahead? How will the city integrate its economic development and climate change goals with its land-use and transportation plan?

 

On Thursday, October 1st, Please Join Transportation Choices Coalition, The Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber and an exciting group of co-hosting organizations for an evening lively debate as we pose these questions of this nature to the Tacoma City Council and Mayoral Candidates.

 

The forum is open to the public, and transportation related questions for the candidates can be submitted prior to the event to juliap@tacomachamber.org. For general event questions or media inquires contact Andrew Austin at Andrew@transportationchoices.org.

 

EVENT INFORMATION
When: Thursday, Oct 1st, 6:30-8:30pm
Where: Carwein Auditorium, UWT

 

Event Co-Hosts: Transportation Choices Coalition, The Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber, University of Washington Urban Studies Program, Futurewise, Cascade Bicycle Club, Tacoma Wheelman’s Bicycle Club, Tacoma Sun, Cascade Land Conservancy, and Exit 133.

Candidate Joe Lonergan Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction:

Below are the questions and responses sent to Joe Lonergan, candidate for Tacoma City Council position.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issue

1) Jail releases

Question: The media has reported that the Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma even if they are arrested in Orting or a remote area of the county.  Would you support a plan which would transport some or all of the jail releases to the places where they were arrested or where they live when their sentence ends.

Answer: Tacoma Police are currently in discussions with County corrections officials about alternatives to releasing offenders from outlying cities into Tacoma.  The Council’s Public Safety committee has expressed interest in this, and I agree it’s worth pursuing.  However, I caution that it’s not a major solution to Tacoma crime issues–just one of many incremental contributors.  I have actively worked on other grassroots solutions and will continue to.

2) Growth management


Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma.
If you are elected, how will you address the effects of sprawl and growth management in Pierce County and the relatively low rate of investment in Tacoma?

Answer: The Puget Sound Regional Council’s “VISION 2040” is an ambitious plan to concentrate the growth of both people and jobs in five Metropolitan cities including Tacoma.  Already this trend was starting when the economic downturn hit.  With intelligent development of mixed use centers, and with COUNTY officials helping steer growth to the cities, rather than creating more and more residential development in places lacking the needed schools, roads, etc. we can “bend the trend.”  I will hold Pierce County leaders accountable on this.

3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues

Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?

If re-elected, what do you plan to do, if anything to reduce the number of felons placed in Tacoma and Pierce County?  Do you agree that Tacoma and Pierce County should have no more than their pro-rata share based on population?  How can the concentration of felons in Tacoma be reduced to the city’s pro-rata share?

Answer: Senators Mike Carrell and Debbie Regala led the way in legislation two years ago that has virtually ended the imbalance in releases to Pierce County.  It will of course take time for the errors of the past to be corrected. Continued efforts to make sure offenders are both monitored and assisted to find legal employment must continue even in this time of State budget shortages.  I will insist on this.


4) Restoration of Winthrop Hotel

Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel.
What is your position on this issue?  Do you support the goal of restoring the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel as the News Tribune and others have advocated?
What ideas do you have to make this goal of many Tacomans a reality?

Answer: Like the Harmon Lofts, Albers Mill, Union Station, UW-Tacoma, the proposed project at the Elks Lodge and dozens of other projects, we need to seek sensible market-driven solutions to restore and/or re-purpose Tacoma’s historic buildings. The fact is market conditions do not make the restoration of the Winthrop to its original purpose likely.  Affordable housing options in Tacoma are in high demand and the Winthrop helps to fill that need with 200 residents who call the Winthrop home.  Current discussions regarding bringing Tacoma Housing Authority in to manage the property are welcome.  I believe that together with THA we can make sure this well-managed, safe and affordable housing is an asset to our community and in keeping with the needs of our city.  There may be some great opportunities to make this building mixed-use with retail on the street level and housing above which would be in keeping with well thought-out and thoroughly debated ideas such as those contained in the Vision 2040 plan for responsible regional growth.

5) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities.  What role can you and Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer: Actually infill was happening at an increasing rate during the five years preceding the last two years of slowing in the economy.  One complaint is that some of the infill done on those vacant lots–or replacement of dilapidated buildings, was not well designed and did not have the best effect on the neighborhoods.  When the economy turns up, our attractive land values relative to King County will invite projects to fill those vacant lots–the key is to be ready with proper planning to get what Tacoma wants there, including job-producing facilities locating here.  I will work for certain targeted, priority development–a grocery store in South Tacoma is just one example.

6) Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown


Question: Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand.  This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods.
Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers

Answer: The current Council is directing the City Manager to move deliberately toward a true “parking system” made up of garages, street parking and transit connections.  I support this effort, working in close partnership with Pierce Transit.

7) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars


Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system.  Gas prices have recently been at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma?  What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?


Answer: Pierce Transit is already doing pilot studies of Bus Rapid Transit on Pacific Avenue, and possibly on other High Demand routes including Sixth Avenue.  There are infrastructure issues in having room for safe passage of either streetcars or express busses mingling with heavy auto traffic on limited right of way, but I absolutely support exploring these possibilities for moving people into and around Tacoma.

8) Pollution Issues in Tacoma


Question: Parts of the City of Tacoma are currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. What actions will you take if elected, if any, to reduce the pollution level in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer: My district (Council District 5) includes much of the area cited for higher than allowed small particulate matter in the air in winter.  This is due in part to people depending on wood stoves for heat.  The state has made a small incentive fund available to change out these stoves to gas or electric furnaces, but the cost of energy will continue to be a barrier for those on limited incomes.  I will fight for more effective incentives that will work long term in the real world.

9) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson

Question: City Manager Eric Anderson has set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. What specific steps, if any, will you take if elected to reduce the crime rate in Tacoma?

Answer: I have been active in crime-reduction efforts for six years on the South End Neighborhood Council.  I will continue to work closely with Community Based Services, Safe Streets, and TPD Community Liaison Officers and other community organizations as we develop and implement measures aimed at prevention, intervention and suppression of criminal activities.  My survey of hundreds of District Five voters shows that this is by far their number ONE issue, so it is mine too.  You can view the results here: http://www.joelonergan.com/viewpoll/24

Candidate Marty Campbell Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Introduction

Below are the questions and responses sent to Marty Campbell, candidate for Tacoma City Council position.
The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issues.

tacoma sun photo

1) Jail releases

Question: The media has reported that the Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma even if they are arrested in Orting or a remote area of the county.  Would you support a plan which would transport some or all of the jail releases to the places where they were arrested or where they live when their sentence ends?

Answer:

Yes, depending on the plan. The County sheriff needs to provide an opportunity for releases to have safe transit to the places where they were arrested or where they live.

2) Growth management

Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma.

If you are elected, how will you address the effects of sprawl and growth management in Pierce County and the relatively low rate of investment in Tacoma?

Answer:

We need strategic thinking when planning for the future growth in Tacoma and Pierce County.  I would continue to push for more comprehensive planning for the City and for our neighborhood business districts.

We also need to make sure we have an effective voice in regional transit planning, while continue to develop sensible transit planning and implementation.

3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues

Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?

If re-elected, what do you plan to do, if anything to reduce the number of felons placed in Tacoma and Pierce County?  Do you agree that Tacoma and Pierce County should have no more than their pro-rata share based on population?  How can the concentration of felons in Tacoma be reduced to the city’s pro-rata share?

Answer:

Yes.  Tacoma has received more that it’s “fair share” of released felons over the years. We need to work with the pierce county sheriff and the department of Corrections (DOC) to develop a workable plan for returning jail releases to the places where they were arrested or where they live.

3) Restoration of Winthrop Hotel

Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel.
What is your position on this issue?  Do you support the goal of restoring the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel as the News Tribune and others have advocated?
What ideas do you have to make this goal of many Tacomans a reality?

Answer:

I support the restoration of historic landmarks.  As seen with the conversations regarding the Elks project, these projects can inspire excitement and bring economic growth to our city.  Hotels and designation as a tourist destination would bring Tacoma more economic growth.  However, downtown growth needs to be matched with growth and investment in our neighborhoods. We need to work with the property owners to help them see their role in our city.

4) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities.  What role can you and Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

We need to ensure that we have a city wide strategic plan for economic recovery.

5) Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown

Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand.  This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods.

Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

Yes. I have in the past and will continue to in the future lead the conservation about sensible transit and parking solutions.

5) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars

Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system.  Gas prices have recently been at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma?  What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

Answer:

Yes. The steps that need to be taken are many and some are very detailed. I am committed to making it sure the process is open and reflects the needs and character of the neighborhood they serve.

We need to identify federal, state, and regional sources for funding and ensure the funding meets our goals and planning.

6) Pollution Issues in Tacoma

Question: Parts of the City of Tacoma are currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. What actions will you take if elected, if any, to reduce the pollution level in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer:

We must work to address storm water run off and non-point sources solutions for reduced pollution into the sound.

To reach attainment in air quality standards, we are going need to develop mass transit and alternative transportation methods.

I will continue to support our office of sustainability and many of the partners we have in the environmental community here in Tacoma.  By offering incentives and proper, sensible regulation we can make steady incremental steps toward addressing pollution levels.

7) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson

Question: City Manager Eric Anderson has set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. What specific steps, if any, will you take if elected to reduce the crime rate in Tacoma?


Answer:

I would support the expansion of community based services throughout the city.  Additionally, I would support an increase in detectives for the police department and seek state and federal funding to target and eliminate the gangs and the criminal behaviors that surround them.

I will continue to be a strong advocate to community policing and continue to be involved in the many community groups in district #4.

I will also work with our school district to address issues of education and our community’s role in educating and keeping our children.

Candidate Keven Rojecki Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Below are the questions and responses sent to Keven Rojecki, candidate for Tacoma City Council position.

The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issues.

1) Jail releases

Question: The media has reported that the Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma even if they are arrested in Orting or a remote area of the county.  Would you support a plan which would transport some or all of the jail releases to the places where they were arrested or where they live when their sentence ends?

Answer:

Yes, I support plans to reduce the high burden of offenders who are released from the Pierce County Jail on our city streets and will work with the State, County and other cities to end this practice.  We should also go a step further; we must find solutions that reduce offender recidivism.  By improving the outcome of people released from jail, we are ensuring a safer community.  Both of these ideas would raise awareness to citizens who fear for their public safety and provide solutions so that the City of Tacoma is not a dumping ground for criminals.

Additionally, an idea would be for the City and County, and collaboration with other cities in the County, to enact ordinances that take from successful state legislation that promotes “fair sharing” of post-incarceration of offenders among Washington Counties.  Promoting a risk and deficit assessment of each offender prior to release will allow for more coordination at release with each jurisdiction involved. We should also work with many of the government and non-profit groups that work to provide assistance for transition from jail to the community they live within.

2) Growth management

Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion, and disinvestment in Tacoma.

If you are elected, how will you address the effects of sprawl and growth management in Pierce County and the relatively low rate of investment in Tacoma?

Answer:

With passage of the Growth Management Act (GMA) in 1990, the City of Tacoma and Pierce County have made progress to reduce suburban sprawl, but more work is needed locally and regionally.  The GMA was state legislation that required local governments to develop comprehensive growth policies and has been the basis by which cities, counties and designated regional boards plan for urban growth relative to open space and environmental protection, economic development, affordable housing, sprawl and transportation issues.

We need reform in our city planning that develops strategies to apply public resources that stimulate private investment in our community.  Currently the City Council is reviewing a proposal by the Planning Committee to improve upon Tacoma’s mixed-use centers and reform their commercial and residential zoning restrictions in order to foster growth and expansion.  This plan causes the city to focus not just on downtown but on the multiple key business districts located throughout Tacoma’s neighborhoods.  The Planning Committee’s intent with this proposal is to concentrate our urban growth in not only our downtown but also in these mixed-use centers that will be used as transit hubs, local business centers, and office space for smaller businesses wishing to bring their services into neighborhoods.

The comprehensive plan resonates with the successful Urban Growth Area Planning established within the GMA.  Effectively, the state desired that counties establish specific urban growth areas that would become the focal point of urban growth by setting heavy restrictions on regions not labeled such, and therefore focusing business, commercial, and heavy residential growth in these urban growth areas.  In Tacoma we can use a similar plan on a smaller scale to effectively do the same.  We need to start developing not just our downtown, but our neighborhoods’ mixed-use centers so that we can foster the investment and development Tacoma needs, throughout our city.

The lack of investment and need for economic development opportunities are serious issues for Tacoma, and both are priorities in my campaign.  We need to reinvest in Tacoma and bring back the vitality and prosperity to our streets that were experienced with the rebuilding of Union Station, establishment of UW Tacoma and other great public and private investments.  We must also stimulate investment in each neighborhood mixed-use center; very few sustainable investments have been made in over a decade and the City Council needs strong leadership that works with our neighborhood and business leaders to improve our neighborhoods.

To address sprawl and lack of investment, we need to take action now.  The first thing city leadership must do is to stop treating Tacoma like a suburb and start treating it like a city.  Much of our city’s planning has been suburban in mentality yet we are not a suburb but rather a rapidly growing city.  Tacoma is a major seaport on the West Coast, we are the state’s third largest city – trailing Spokane only by a few thousand people – and Tacoma is the metropolitan center of Pierce County, which hosts a population of nearly 800,000.

In order to re-invest in our city the City Council needs strong new leadership that is bold as well as willing to look at every option.  For too long we have left things up to the market hoping that our city would prosper in due time.  This has not worked for America’s economy and it will not work for Tacoma’s.  We can also focus on simple goals that improve the quality of life for every citizen.  It’s time for us to take action and we must use every level and branch of government to do so and bring collaboration with business leaders for long-term development with these goals in mind.


3) Pierce County Felon “Dumping Ground” Issues

Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?

If re-elected, what do you plan to do, if anything to reduce the number of felons placed in Tacoma and Pierce County?  Do you agree that Tacoma and Pierce County should have no more than their pro-rata share based on population?  How can the concentration of felons in Tacoma be reduced to the city’s pro-rata share?

Answer:

Yes, I agree that Tacoma and Pierce County should not have more than our fair share of felon’s released in pro-rata of its population.  In recent history, Tacoma and Pierce County had a higher population of felons on our streets because of Washington State Department of Correction facilities located nearby.  The practice of releasing felons at a higher rate than any other city or county must stop and is a serious public safety concern that will take leadership from the city, county and state government.

Since the Tacoma City Club report, Governor Gregoire signed into law Senate Bill 6157, which changed provisions affecting offenders who leave confinement.  This legislation is a step forward, but more work must be accomplished to bring safer streets and to reduce the recidivism of post-offenders who choose to stay near the inner city.  Many of the felons released from confinement are incarcerated by the city, county or state and coordination amongst these jurisdictions is necessary to provide long-term solutions.

We must address these critical issues now to support a more livable city and bring a greater sense of security for each neighborhood.  With city, county, and state support we can start re-proportioning our felon population throughout the state, rather than dumping everyone here in Tacoma and perpetuating our city’s crime problem.


4) Restoration of Winthrop Hotel

Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel.

What is your position on this issue?  Do you support the goal of restoring the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel as the News Tribune and others have advocated?

What ideas do you have to make this goal of many Tacomans a reality?

Answer:

Yes, rebuilding the Winthrop would be a significant step in reinvesting in Tacoma. The Davenport has been a huge success in Spokane and we should take a similar course of action to renovate the Winthrop.  The primary concern is of course money as the hotel’s renovation will cost millions.  The short-term investment would benefit the city with long-term stabilization on cleaning up areas of the city that deter private development opportunities.  The Winthrop project would also create new economic development opportunities as the Link light rail line is in close proximity.  Additionally it would turn what is currently blight upon our downtown into a symbol of revitalization and reinvestment in our city.

We have two overall options with the reconstruction of the Winthrop.  We can allow the Winthrop to be sold to a developer under conditions and guidelines that will ensure the building is transformed into the hotel or mixed-use center.  Alternatively, the city can utilize bonding or alternate revenue sources to create a public-private partnership and rebuild the structure in an effort to pull together a foundation of new opportunities for downtown development.  The first option allows the city to avoid making a major investment and distribute funds during a recession while the latter allows the city to take advantage of the low cost of land and building space to make a long-term and cost-effective investment.

Regardless of which route we end up choosing I will strongly advocate as a City Council Member to restore the Winthrop as I believe the City Council should lead the way for stimulating reinvestment in Tacoma.  Further, the state can also be an enormous benefactor to revitalizing the Winthrop and other properties; my experiences and relationships with State appropriation leaders will help bring capital improvement revenue to make this project a reality.

5) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities.  What role can you and Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

When it comes to rebuilding and revitalizing our city we must make priorities.  Before we begin investing in new developments we need to look at the vacant lots and empty buildings throughout our city.  We must begin our efforts of reinvesting in Tacoma with these sites.  Let’s stop spending the city’s limited resources on pet projects and invest in revitalizing.  While I believe we have an amazing convention center in Downtown, I am saddened that I rarely get to see it used for the potential it was built.  We do not have the urban vitality or hotel space to support large events at the center.  As a leader on the City Council I will choose to rebuild, reinvest, and revitalize our dilapidated and empty buildings with strong leadership, partnerships with community business leaders, and state leaders ready to invest in our city.

Tacoma needs to jump start its economy and urban vitality with long term vision that promotes public investment and public/private partnerships that resolve problems, not complicate them further.  The lack of class A office space, hotel rooms to support thousands of convention goers and a lack of retail stores in our downtown has hindered and prevented further business investment in our city’s core.  As new “For Lease” signs show up in windows all over our city at an enormous rate, we cannot continue to ignore the harmful effects these have on our neighborhoods.


6) Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown

Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand.  This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods.

Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacoma’s mixed use centers?

Answer:

Yes, with provisions that periodically evaluate the reduction in off-street parking requirements.  By reducing the off-street parking requirements the city would effectively establish a plan that promotes higher density and pedestrian friendly mixed-use centers.  The reduced requirements would encourage alternate transportation choices such as bicycles, streetcars, buses, and light rail, all which I strongly support.  If these requirements are approved, the city must move toward a multi-modal transportation system and provide capital investment in high capacity alternatives while prioritizing transportation corridors in areas near mixed-use centers.  It is essential that Pierce Transit, Sound Transit and the City of Tacoma work together to find solutions that make the reduction in off-street parking sustainable for the future and meet the intended goals of reducing sprawl and developing neighborhoods we can walk in.


7) Restoring Tacoma’s Streetcars

Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacoma’s streetcar system.  Gas prices have recently been at record levels.  Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma?  What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?

Answer:

I strongly support any and all efforts to bring back our streetcar system.  Currently cars are our primary means of transportation throughout the city and we have an opportunity to reduce environmental concerns and provide economic development opportunities that create a more livable city for all citizens.  Tacoma is growing rapidly along with the greater Pierce County region.  We need to develop long-term solutions to an already overwhelmed transportation system.  I believe the City of Tacoma must provide the capital investment, build a coalition of economic partners, and bring mass transit options into our city.


VIII) Pollution Issues in Tacoma

Question: Parts of the City of Tacoma are currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. What actions will you take if elected, if any, to reduce the pollution level in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer:

Our environmental goals in Tacoma need to be: One, expansion in our light rail system from beyond Tacoma’s downtown and reach into each of our neighborhoods to lower CO2 emissions and improve air quality.  Two, continue to make progress and expand opportunities for green construction and sustainable design. Three, we must address the environmental concerns that contaminate Commencement Bay and make certain that our drinking water supply is safe and healthy for years to come.

We have been discussing the use of mass transit throughout Tacoma for over a decade.  The time for action in now; we need to begin construction of a viable streetcar/light rail system.  We can do this with strong leadership and public financing that will remove cars from the road and provide economic opportunities that also enhance the vitality of our neighborhoods.  We cannot simply wait for business interests to make green buildings and sustainable design principles through the normal route.  We can help businesses with leadership that shows reward and investment for a better Tacoma.  I would take lead as a City Council Member to work with the Office of Sustainability on programs and initiatives that set benchmarks for the reduction of green house gas emissions as one of my first actions in office.  The drinking water, by ways of rivers and streams, along with Puget Sound are not free of chemicals and pesticides.  We can further our education and work toward making each of our citizens aware of their actions and how this impacts our natural resources.  If we fail to correct standard behavior by most, we have failed to lead the effort toward reduction and elimination of the things that pollute our environment.

Through education, benchmarks, and immediate action I hope to bring resolution and change to Tacoma’s environmental challenges.

9) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson

Question: City Manager Eric Anderson has set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. What specific steps, if any, will you take if elected to reduce the crime rate in Tacoma

Answer:

The proposal to reduce crime by 50% in 14 months is unrealistic if our approach to prevention and early intervention programs remain unchanged or not funded appropriately.  We must look at a balanced approach to keep criminals from re-offending and deter our at-risk youth from wandering the streets.  The City Council must provide the resources for a multi-faceted program that includes prevention and early intervention programs as well as enhancements to prediction and response of criminal activities.  A citywide program that partners with citizens, community organizations, and city departments to create a citywide strategy is essential to a successful reduction in crime.

As a firefighter, I know the importance of public safety and the resulting impact on our community if citizens fear for their safety.  My plans would include looking to other communities’ plans that reduced violent crime, reduced gang activity, and created more livable neighborhoods.  Specifically, I would bring together new partners to develop a realistic plan that includes prevention, early intervention, new technologies, and promote volunteer opportunities in neighborhoods.  It has been shown that strategies which rely on close cooperation between the police department and the community result in decreased crime and improved relations.

Victoria Woodards Answers Tough Urban Questions From the Tacoma Sun

Below are the questions and responses sent to Victoria Woodards, candidate for Tacoma City Council position.

The questions being asked to Tacoma City Council candidates this year from the Tacoma Sun are very specific and address such issues as the Winthrop Hotel, Parking Requirements, Tacoma Streetcars, and Felon Dumping Ground Issues.

1) Jail releases


Question: The media has reported that the Pierce County Jail currently releases nearly all of the people who have been arrested in Pierce County into downtown Tacoma even if they are arrested in Orting or a remote area of the county.  Would you support a plan which would transport some or all of the jail releases to the places where they were arrested or where they live when their sentence ends?

Answer: YES

2) Growth management

Question: Over the last 30 years, Pierce County has been known for suburban sprawl which has caused the loss of farmland, pollution, traffic congestion and disinvestment in Tacoma.

If you are elected, how will you address the effects of sprawl and growth management in Pierce County and the relatively low rate of investment in Tacoma?

Answer: When I was a kid I remember driving 15 minutes out of town and feeling like I was in the country. The trip to Northwest Trek used to seem like a true adventure. Today, the trip to Northwest Trek is not the same. Tacoma has built out. I see the effects of sprawl and I want to preserve the attributes that make Tacoma and Pierce County so rich. I support development and opportunities for people to LIVE in high density areas. I believe that mixed use and high density centers create great opportunities for sustainability. I will work to create incentives for high density and mixed use centers.

3) Pierce County Felon Dumping Ground Issues


Question: As you know, Tacoma and Pierce County have a disproportionate number of released felons placed by the Department of Corrections as described in the Tacoma City Club report: 30 Years of DOC in Pierce County, Was It worth It?

If elected, what do you plan to do, if anything to reduce the number of felons placed in Tacoma and Pierce County?  Do you agree that Tacoma and Pierce County should have no more than their pro-rata share based on population?  How can the concentration of felons in Tacoma be reduced to the citys pro-rata share?

Answer: Tacoma does not deserve to be the dumping ground for released felons. I dont believe we deserve more than our fair share and I support legislation such as SB 6157 (2007-2008) which sought to change provisions of offenders who left confinement. Joint efforts with the Department of Corrections (DOC), local law enforcement, and state and local elected officials will be imperative. The strength of these collaborations can help examine statistics and determine our fair share. I will continue to work with the state legislators to create laws prohibiting more than our fair share of felons in Tacoma.

3) Restoration of Winthrop Hotel

Question: A great many Tacomans would like to see the Winthrop Hotel restored as Spokane has restored the Davenport Hotel.

What is your position on this issue?  Do you support the goal of restoring the Winthrop Hotel back into a hotel as the News Tribune and others have advocated?

What ideas do you have to make this goal of many Tacomans a reality?


Answer: I have visited the Davenport Hotel in Spokane and I recognize the value of this kind of historical landmark. Tacoma deserves to have a similar treasure in our community. Where funds are available I support the restoration of this hotel. In these tough economic times continued exploration of public/private partnerships will be the best way to make this goal a reality.


4) Rebuilding Tacoma

Question: Despite the progress made, Tacoma still has a large number of vacant lots, and empty and blighted buildings relative to other west coast cities.  What role can you and Tacoma take, if you are elected, to support the rebuilding of downtown Tacoma and Tacomas mixed use centers?

Answer: I remember when Downtown Tacoma had a department store & restaurants and few, if any, vacant buildings. I understand and have a real commitment to returning Downtown Tacoma to the place I remember. As a convener Id pull together resources to devise and implement a plan to turn Downtown Tacoma into the place it used to be.


5) Building Walkable Neighborhood Centers and Downtown

Cities such as Portland, Seattle, Bellingham, and San Francisco have removed their off-street parking requirements to allow parking to be built based on market demand.  This also has the benefit of reducing sprawl, reducing pollution and allowing the construction of walkable neighborhoods.

Do you support removing the off-street parking requirement in downtown Tacoma and in Tacomas mixed use centers?

Answer: Yes. Building walk-able neighborhoods creates successful opportunities to restore downtown and enhance our business districts into safer, greener, urban communities to be enjoyed by families, shoppers, tourists, cyclists, and diverse groups from the city.

.

6) Restoring Tacomas Streetcars

Question: Many Tacomans support restoring Tacomas streetcar system.  Gas prices have recently been at record levels. Do you support restoring the streetcar network in Tacoma?  What steps would be needed to be taken to make this happen?


Answer:
Yes. Sustainability comes from creating convenience. I believe streetcars are an opportunity to create transportation in areas that lack convenience. Public/private partnerships with Pierce County Transit, Sound Transit, as well as other transit organizations are key in the successful restoration of the streetcar network.

.

7) Pollution Issues in Tacoma

Question: Parts of the City of Tacoma are currently failing the pollution criteria set by the State of Washington. What actions will you take if elected, if any, to reduce the pollution level in the city limits of Tacoma?

Answer: The Green Climate Taskforce has made recommendation to keep the City of Tacoma green and more sustainable. To reduce the pollution level in Tacoma my plan would include utilizing the aforementioned recommendations in collaboration with the expertise of the Office of Sustainability to work toward finding new and innovative means to address this issue.

.

VIII) Crime Reduction Proposal by City Manager Eric Anderson

Question: City Manager Eric Anderson has set a goal to reduce crime in Tacoma by 50 percent in 14 months. What specific steps, if any, will you take if elected to reduce the crime rate in Tacoma?

Answer: In an effort to reduce the crime rate I would employ professionals in law enforcement who can research and explain reasonable endeavors toward reduction of crime and the increase of safety. Neighborhood watch groups and organizations such as Safe Streets will be paramount in